Issue of acculturation - reference to Wechsler tests Flashcards
Acculturation is a critically important and yet…
Little understood component of ability assessment and measurement
When test developers norm tests they often do so under socially constructed categories such as what?
Race and ethnicity
When test developers norm tests they do so under socially constructed categories such as what race and ethnicity. What do Ortiz and colleagues (2006) point out in relation to this?
These categories do little in achieving accurate representation along the relevant and important dimensions that actually affect test performance.
Neither skin colour nor an individual’s ethnic heritage affects test performance directly.
It is the individual’s developmental background, particularly with respect to linguistic and acculturative experiences, that influences the manner in which the individual responds on standardized norm referenced tests.
Neither skin colour nor an individual’s ethnic heritage affects test performance directly. Rather…
It is the individual’s developmental background, particularly with respect to linguistic and acculturative experiences, that influences the manner in which the individual responds on standardized norm referenced tests.
Controlling for racial or ethnic differences via stratified random sampling may provide a desired measure of face validity for the norm sample, but what is the problem with it?
It only ensures that proportionate numbers of individuals from such backgrounds are included in the normative sample. It does not ensure that individuals from such backgrounds have comparable experiences particularly as related to linguistic development and acculturative experiences
When an individual’s acculturation differs from those on whom a test was standardized, are the use of the norms of that test as an index for evaluating that individual’s current level of performance or predicting future performance appropriate?
When an individual’s acculturation differs from those on whom a test was standardized, the use of the norms of that test as an index for evaluating that individual’s current performance or for predicting future performance may be inappropriate
Who conducted a study examining the relationship between acculturation and WAIS-III and WMS-III scores?
Harris et al. (2003)
In a study examining the relationship between acculturation and WAIS-III and WMS-III scores, what did Harris and colleagues (2003) do?
- Analyzed demographic questionnaire data collected as part of the WAIS-III and WMS-III standardization studies (Tulsky & Zhu, unpublished)
- From the sample of 3050 examinees, the authors selected 150 examinees who reported being born outside of the US, and that they spoke English fluently as a second language
- 3 variables related to acculturation were created from the data obtained on the questionnaire, these were: language preference, US experience, and US education
In a study examining the relationship between acculturation and WAIS-III and WMS-III scores, Harris and colleagues (2003) analyzed demographic questionnaire data collected as part of the WAIS-III and WMS-III standardization studies - who conducted the WAIS-III and WMS-III standardization studies?
Tulsky and Zhu, unpublished
How many examinees took part in the WAIS-III and WMS-III standardization studies?
3050
Of the 3050 examinees who took part in the the WAIS-III and WMS-III standardization studies, how many were used for the acculturation study?
150
For this study, 3 variables related to acculturation were created from the data obtained on the questionnaire. Whereas traditional analyses of demographic variables have focused on age, education, and gender, these new variables attempted to…
further contribute to considerations of relevant demographic and language or acculturation-related variables.
The first variable “Language Preference” was developed to…
index self-reported language preference for speaking, thinking, reading, and writing.
The first variable “Language Preference” was developed to index self-reported language preference for speaking, thinking, reading, and writing. This variable provided an index of the examinee’s what?
self-reported preference and comfort level in using English versus another language.
The first variable “Language Preference” was developed to index self-reported language preference for speaking, thinking, reading, and writing. This variable provided an index of the examinee’s self-reported preference and comfort level in using English versus another language. What was it not?
It was not a measure of language proficiency.