Ishibashi: Conscientious Objection Flashcards

1
Q

a physician’s willingness to put patients’ interests ahead of personal profit as well as a willingness to make personal sacrifices and assume some personal risk

A

fiduciary relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fiduciary relationships are guided by the principle of (blank)

A

beneficence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is it appropriate to refuse care for patients?

A

adversarial doctor-patient relationship
threat to personal safety
personal moral objections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Provide some examples of times when physicians have felt a threat to personal safety

A

HIV
SARS (2002-2003)
H1N1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

laws that allow medical providers to refuse to provide services and medically necessary treatment to which they have religious or moral objections

A

conscious clauses - also known as refusal clauses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conscience clauses enacted in 1973 with what court case? What was the first conscience clause to be enacted into law? By 1978, virtually all states had enacted conscience clause legislation.

A

Roe vs Wade; 1973 Church Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In 1996, the law determined who is considered a health care entity. Who does this include? Recent legislation has been proposed to expand this definition.

A

Individual physicians, post-graduate physician training programs, and participants in health professional training programs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T/F: Most people believe that health professionals should not have to engage in medical practices about which they have moral qualms.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

T/F: Most also believe that patients should have access to legal treatments, even in situations in which their physicians are troubled about the moral implication of those treatments.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Two conflicting forces

A

patient autonomy

right of conscience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A patient’s right of autonomy does not trump the physician’s right to conscientiously abstain from a practice provided that:

A

(1) the physician provides the patient information that would allow her to seek care with another health care provider
(2) the physician’s refusal does not endanger the patient’s life or result in serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

T/F: “In an emergency in which referral is not possible or might negatively have an impact on a patient’s physical or mental health, providers have an obligation to provide medically indicated and requested care.”

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

T/F: Health care providers have a duty to perform procedures within the scope of their training when the patient’s health is at significant risk and an alternative health care professional is unavailable

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Abortion . . . is never permitted. Every procedure whose sole immediate effect is the termination of pregnancy before viability is an abortion.”
Contraception and tubal ligations are not permitted.
Controversy with regards to treatment of ectopic pregnancies

A

Catholic hospital directives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is autonomy an absolute?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

T/F: Physicians who, on the basis of conscience, refuse to provide particular treatments or services within the usual scope of practice for their specialty have an obligation to disclose this to potential patients. This knowledge may be important to patients in selecting physicians

A

true

17
Q

T/F: If patients are concerned about certain interventions for sexual and reproductive health and end of life care, they should ask their doctors ahead of time whether they will discuss such options.

A

true

18
Q

T/F: A physician my decline to accept applicants for their care on a wide variety of non-discriminatory grounds without assuming any responsibility to refer them to other health care professionals, but once a patient-physician or comparable relationship exists, however, the AMA, ACOG, AAP recognizes an ethical duty of referral. Courts may find it negligent or a breach of fiduciary duty for health care professionals to care for patients to whom they have not previously disclosed the procedures within their expected scope of practice that they will refuse to provide.

A

true

19
Q

T/F: When physicians were surveyed, 8% said no and 6% undecided when asked if they have the obligation to present all possible options to a patient who they have refused to provide care for.

A

True