Iranian Kurds Flashcards
Implication of the Study
ethno-nationalism is a contextually contingent process and can express itself in multiple forms over long periods
The Kurds
divided between the borders of Turkey, Iran and Syria
Turkey (23%), Iraq (23%), Iran (10%)
difficult to measure who falls into categories
years of intermarriages
Six Stages of Kurdish Ethno-nationalism in Iran
1) Fragmentation
2) Politicization and Independence
3) Electoral Politics
4) From Radicalization to Inactivity
5) From Electoral Politics to Armed Conflict
6) From Guerilla warfare to Inactivity
Fragmentation
Qajar Dysasty
Persia was ruled by him
Iran was penetrated by foreign countries
Persia and Tribal Identity
country was divided politically
There was no coherent Persian identity
the imperial structure of Persia which supported the traditional elites within Persian communities
dedicated to protecting their tribal, religious identity
each tribe had their own land
Tribal identity over and above any national identity
lines of inclusion and exclusion based on Islam
so: a very limited manifestation of Kurdish nationalism by disorganized tribal militas
Gradual Structural Stages
Rexa Shah, a military commander, seized power in 1921
Rexa was in love with what was happening in Turkey
Attempted to modernize Iran from Turkey’s views
Implemented state building and same policies in Iran
Ended tribal conflict in Iran
Wanted tribes to settle and not move around
* some Kurdish tribes were destroyed because of this policy
* did not provide sufficient funds for Kurds to mobilize
Stage 2: Politicization and Independence
During WW2 and the presence of foreign powers
soviet troops in the North
British troops in the south
Consequences of the former Shah’s modernization
Iranian Kurds now started to see themselves as Kurds
The First Iranian Kurdish Political Party: JK
1942
The JK’s major tools to promote its ethno-nationalist ideologies
*print publications
*official journal: Long Live Kurdistan
The Formation of Kurdish Democratic Party (KDPI)
rejection of armed conflict
very strong religious tendency
strong contrast to the strong leftist views that they obtained later
Republic of Kurdistan
issued a formal declaration
demand for autonomy of the Kurds
autonomy, not independence
sense of optimism amongst Kurdish leaders
encourage Kurds to take a step further
successfully managed to frame a politicized Kurdish identity: Peshmerga, flag, anthem`
Stage 3 : Electoral Politics
The rise of Iranian leftists movements
a considerably liberal and inclusive state
nationalized Iranian petroleum industries as British had control over petrol over this time
wanted to give more autonomy for the peripheries
Stage 3 : Electoral Politics (2)
The Kurds had the opportunity to push for within-state solutions
Kurds used electoral system to voice their opinions
overthrown by a coup (led by Britain and US) in 1953
Kurdish nationalist movements became radicalized after coip
Stage 4: From Radicalization to Inactivity
Mossadeq (democratically elected PM from 1951-1953)
back to a period of fear and terror
In the 1960s until the Islamic Revolution
*persanization
*Repression (SAVAK: the secret police)
1964: the KDPI: Democracy for Iran, autonomy for Kurdistan
The Iraqi Kurds vs KDPI (Iranian Kurds)
Stage 5: From Electoral Politics to Armed Conflict
In 1969: gradual disintegration of the centralized structure of the movement
1970s and revolutionary movements: the development of Peshmerga forces into an independent force
1979 revolution: from inclusion to exclusion
1979: Declaration of a Holy War on Kurds
1980: The Iran-Iraq War
longest international conflict after WWII
provided military and financial support of Kurds in other countries
the assassination of Kurdish leaders