Involuntary manslaughter P1 SEC B Flashcards
in what case did the supreme court set out 6 elements of proving GNM
R v Broughton
what are the 6 elements to prove GNM
D must owe a duty of care
D must breach that duty of care
there must be a serious and obvious risk of death
risk must be reasonably forseeable
Ds breach must cause Vs death
the breach must be grossly negligent
what is gross negligent manslaughter
didnt mean to be unlawful but was careless
what is unlawful act manslaughter
committed some unlawful act and someone died as a result
what is involuntary manslaughter
unlawful killing without intent to kill or cause GBH
what case will always be used for a duty of care
Robinson
what is the case for serious and obvious risk of death
R v Rose
who does not have to forsee a serious and obvious risk of death
doesn’t matter if D knows only matters if reasonable person would foresee a serious and obvious risk of death
what is the test for factual causation
the but for test
what is the case for the but for test
R v Pagget
R v White
what is the test for legal causation
operative and substantial test
what is the cases for the operative and substantial test
R v Smith
R v Jordan
what chain will be broken if there is an intervening act that is…..
unforeseeable and unreasonable
what are the 3 intervening acts and the cases/ examples of each
acts of third party - R v Jordan or R v Pagget
victims own actions - R v Williams
acts of god - earthquake
what is the case for gross negligence
Broughton
in Broughton it says to decide if something is grossly negligent the court said to ask the jury if
the circumstances of the breach where truly exceptionally bad as to require criminal sanction
when does unlawful act manslaughter occur
this offence occurs when D does not intend to kill or cause GBH but he has committed an unlawful act which has led to the death of V
what are the 3 cases for unlawful act manslaughter
R v Stone and Dobinson
R v Franklin
R v Lamb
what is the legal principle for R v Stone and Dobinson
a failure(omission) will be insufficient for unlawful act manslaughter
there must be an act
what is the legal principle for R v Franklin
unlawful act must be criminal
a civil wrong is not enough
what are examples of unlawful acts
assault battery and criminal damage
what is the legal principle for R v Lamb
D must have all elements of the unlawful act
actus reus and mens rea
what is the mens rea for unlawful acts
the defendant only needs the mens rea for the unlawful act they do not need to have the mens rea for the death
what are the 2 cases for mens rea of an unlawful act
DPP v Newbury and Jones
Mitchell