Introduction Flashcards
What will the civil judge take into account
Whether the defendant has breached their obligations to the claimant and whether that breach has caused the loss
Balance of probabilities
It needs to be more probable than not that the obligations have been breached by the defendant and that has caused the loss
Judgment
Final decision on liability, quantum and/or remedy
Overriding objective
To deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost
What does the overriding objective include (6)
Ensuring that the parties are on equal footing; saving expense; dealing with cases in ways that are proportionate to the money involved, importance of the case, complexity and parties’ financial position; ensuring that cases are dealt with expeditiously and fairly; allotting appropriate court resources; ensuring that PDs etc. are complied with
Rule 1.3
Parties are required to help the court further the overriding objective
Indemnity principle
Winning party cannot recover more from their opponent that they have to pay to their solicitor in the course of the litigation
Rule 44.2
The court has discretion as to whether costs are payable, the amount of theses costs and when they are to be paid
Factors to take into account by the court when exercising discretion under r44.2 (5)
Parties’ conduct before and during the proceedings; the reasonableness of parties’ raising, pursuing and contesting any allegation; the way the party pursued or defended case/allegation; whether the winner exaggerated their claim; whether a party was only partly successful
Usual costs rule
Costs follow the event
Standard basis
The default basis; the costs must not have been unreasonably incurred or be unreasonable in amount but only proportionate costs are allowed
If there’s any doubt in the standard basis, who is it resolved in favour of?
The paying party
Indemnity basis
The costs must not have been unreasonably incurred or be unreasonably incurred or be unreasonable in amount
In deciding the reasonableness, what will be taken into account (7)
Conduct of parties; value of money involved; importance of matter to parties; complexity of the matter; skill and effort involved; time spent; place and circumstances in which work is done; the receiving party’s last approved/agreed budget
In deciding proportionality, what should be taken into account (5)
Sums in issue; value or any non-monetary relief; complexity of the case; additional work generated by the conduct of the paying party; further factors such as public importance