Disclosure and Inspection Flashcards

1
Q

What is the premise underpinning disclosure?

A

That litigation is based on all the information that will be available to the court at trial having already been made available to the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does disclosure mean?

A

Revealing the existence of relevant documents although not all documents need to be made available for the opponent to see

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What’s the main purpose of disclosure?

A

To enable the parties to evaluate the strength of their case before trial and so encourage settlement and saving of costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disclosure is subject to-

A

Management by the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the court have to take into account when making a disclosure order?

A

The overriding objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What’s the idea of the disclosure pilot?

A

That disclosure should be no wider that is strictly necessary to dispose of a case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disclosure pilot structure

A

Initial disclosure of key documents within statements of the case followed by possible extended disclosure which takes place later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is disclosure to do?

A

Reveal the existence of all the documents that either support or undermine the respective parties’ case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When, in most cases, will an order for disclosure be made?

A

When the court considers the parties’ DQs or at the first CMC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In the context of disclosure, the directions order-

A

Will include a date by which the parties lists of documents are to be made available to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Document

A

Anything upon which information of any description is recorded, including electronically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In multi-track (excluding PI), as regards disclosure, the court-

A

Has flexibility to make a range of disclosure orders with regard to the overriding objective and the need to deal with the case justly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In fast track (and PI), as regards disclosure, the court-

A

Will usually order standard disclosure (with limits sometimes imposed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under r31.6, standard disclosure requires a party to disclose-

A

Documents on which it relies, documents which affect its own case adversely and affect the other party’s case adversely and support the other party’s case, documents which in particular types of claim are specified by a relevant PD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is the question of whether a document should be disclosed in SD determined?

A

By reference to issues raised in the parties’ statements of case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The meaning of control

A

The documents which a party has physical possession of, a right to possession or to inspect or take copies of, had but no longer has

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holding Inc 2012

A

The court will take a factual approach to determine whether documents are in party’s control - a document can be within a party’s control notwithstanding that it has never been in a party’s possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When giving standard disclosure, a party has a duty to-

A

Make a reasonable search for those documents falling within r31.6(b) or (c)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In deciding what is a reasonable search, a party can consider the following factors (4)

A

The number of documents involved, the nature and complexity of the proceedings, the ease and expense of retrieval of documents, the significance of any document which is likely to be located during the search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Rule 31.7(3)

A

Where a party considers it unreasonable to search for a particular category or class of documents that party does not need to disclose that category or class but must state in the disclosure statement that it has not been disclosed as it would be disproportionate to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Para 2 PD 31A - it may be reasonable to decide-

A

Not to search for documents coming into existence before a particular date or to limit the search to documents in a particular place or to documents falling into particular categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A legal representative has an obligation to the court to ensure that-

A

Their client makes a full disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Each party under an obligation to give disclosure-

A

Is required to make a reasonable and proportionate search for documents - qualified by the principle of reasonableness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When it comes to electronic documents in the multi-track-

A

The DQ asks parties to consider issues of e-disclosure early and to complete an electronic documents questionnaire where appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

N265

A

List of documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Can the parties agree in writing as regards the form of disclosure?

A

Yes - no list or disclosure statement

27
Q

What does the disclosure statement must do?

A

Detail extent of the search undertaken, certify that person giving it understands the duty to give disclosure, certify that they have carried out that duty, declare they believe search reasonable in the circumstances, that if a search not carried out the reasons why, if any searches limited then what limitations and why

28
Q

Who signs the disclosure statement?

A

The party disclosing the documents i.e. the client

29
Q

Three sections of N265

A

Top: lists and numbers all documents that it doesn’t object to the opponent inspecting; Middle: documents it objects to inspecting and reason; Bottom: documents no longer in control but when they were and where document is now

30
Q

Two questions to ask when compiling list of documents

A

Is the document disclosable? Does the client have the right (or duty) to withhold inspection?

31
Q

Five categories of documents

A

Disclosable but disclosure withheld; Disclosable but inspection withheld; Disclosable and disclosure and inspection will be permitted; Partly disclosable - part will be redacted; Not disclosable

32
Q

The obligation to give disclosure is-

A

Continuing until the proceedings are concluded - supplemental lists to be served if necessary

33
Q

If a client objects to disclosing a disclosable document-

A

The legal representative has a duty to withdraw from acting for that client as they have an overriding duty not to mislead the court and not be complicit in the client misleading the court

34
Q

The time period for inspection of documents is-

A

Set out in the directions and usually seven days after disclosure

35
Q

If no time period set for inspection in directions-

A

Written notice given by a party who wishes to inspect and inspection within seven days from that

36
Q

Any claim to withhold inspection-

A

May be challenged by the opponent

37
Q

Grounds for withholding inspection

A

No longer in control; Right or duty to withhold inspection; would be disproportionate to the issues in the case to permit inspection

38
Q

Steps to take after being served with a list of documents

A

Review the list, serve the notice to inspect

39
Q

How to challenge the extent of search/allocation of documents

A

Contempt of court (rare); Write to opponent’s legal representative; Application for specific disclosure; Application for specific inspection/challenging right of opponent to withhold inspection (when privilege claimed)

40
Q

Rule 31.21

A

Unless the court gives permission, a party may not rely on as evidence any document which they fail to disclose or in respect of which they fail to permit inspection

41
Q

What is the underlying purpose of specific disclosure?

A

To ensure that justice is done between the parties and to avoid a situation where a party may have or obtain an unfair advantage as a result of a document not being produced for inspection as a result of standard disclosure

42
Q

The court can make a specific disclosure order requiring a party to disclose or search for and disclose documents which (2)

A

It is reasonable to suppose may contain information which will assist the applicant’s case or damage the respondent’s case; May lead to a train of enquiry which has either of those consequences

43
Q

The court will make a specific disclosure order if-

A

Standard disclosure is inadequate

44
Q

Steps to take before making a specific disclosure application

A

Write to the opposing party, explain what is wanted and why, seek full particulars of the search that has been made and give a deadline

45
Q

Privilege

A

It entitles a party to withhold evidence from production to a third party, an opponent in proceedings or to court

46
Q

Once privilege has been established-

A

An absolute right to withhold the documents in question arises

47
Q

Types of privilege (7)

A

Legal advice privilege; Litigation privilege; Common interest privilege; Joint interest privilege; Privilege against self-incrimination; Public interest immunity; Without prejudice privilege

48
Q

Legal professional privilege cannot be claimed-

A

Unless the evidence in question is confidential

49
Q

Who does legal professional privilege belongs to?

A

The client

50
Q

To what does legal advice privilege apply?

A

To all communications made between the client and their lawyer in which advice is sought or given within the legal context

51
Q

When does legal advice privilege apply?

A

Whether or not litigation is pending or contemplated

52
Q

What does litigation privilege protect?

A

Third party communications such as those with an expert withness

53
Q

For litigation privilege to arise-

A

Litigation must be pending or contemplated

54
Q

To claim litigation privilege for a document-

A

The dominant purpose of the document must be to prepare for the litigation in progress or in contemplation by giving advice, obtaining advice and collecting advice

55
Q

What will the litigation privilege attach to once established?

A

The communications themselves, the documents and materials used to provide the advice and the documents generated from the communications

56
Q

Common interest privilege

A

Operates to preserve privilege in documents that are disclosed to third parties

57
Q

How is the common interest privilege applied?

A

If party A has a sufficiently common interest in communications held by party B then party A can obtain disclosure of those communications from party B even though as against third parties the communications would be privileged from production

58
Q

Joint interest privilege

A

Where a third party can establish a joint interest with one another then, even though there is no confidentiality between them, each can assert joint privilege if they should subsequently fall out

59
Q

Without prejudice privilege

A

A genuine attempt to settle proceedings is protected as such, that means neither party to the WP negotiations may put in evidence the content or detail or the fact that an offer or concession has been made at all

60
Q

Public interest immunity

A

A party is entitled to withhold disclosure of a document on the ground that disclosure would damage the public interest

61
Q

Will the court permit to put in evidence part only of a privileged document?

A

No, a limited waiver is treated as a waiver in respect of the entire document

62
Q

A party who has come into possession of illegally obtained documents-

A

Is not allowed to assert privilege over them

63
Q

Once the illegally documents have been disclosed-

A

The court has a discretion to exclude them as evidence at trial