Introduction

Question 1

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), federal courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 conservatively when clarifying the laws governing totally integrated, sale-of-goods contracts.

Answer 1

False

Question 2

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), state courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 conservatively to clarify state and federal commercial-transactions laws.

Answer 2

False

Question 3

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), state and federal courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 liberally to simplify the common law which solely governs
totally integrated contracts.

Answer 3

False

Question 4

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), federal courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 liberally to unify commercial-transactions laws across and within state
and federal jurisdictions.

Answer 4

True

Question 5

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), the purpose of the UCC-Article-2 is to modernize state and federal rules which govern solely the interpretation of
totally integrated contracts

Answer 5

False

Question 6

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), the purpose of the UCC-Article-2 is to modernize federal rules which govern commercial transactions.

Answer 6

True

Question 7

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), state courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 liberally to unify sale-of-goods laws across and within international
jurisdictions.

Answer 7

False

Question 8

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), state courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 liberally to unify sale-of-goods laws across and within state and federal
jurisdictions.

Answer 8

True

Question 9

Under the UCC § 1-103(a), federal courts must construe the UCC-Article-2 liberally when attempting to modernize international commercialtransactions
rules.

Answer 9

False

Question 10

Under the CISG-Art.2, buyers and sellers may fashion international saleof-goods contracts involving all types of goods.

Answer 10

False

Question 11

Under the CISG, Art.2, buyers and sellers may fashion international saleof-services contracts involving all types of services

Answer 11

False

Question 12

Generally, the UCC § 2-102 governs legal disputes involving “transactionsin goods” rather than disputes involving the “sale of goods

Answer 12

True

Question 13

Generally, under the UCC § 2-102, the term “transactions in goods” has a broader legal meaning or scope of coverage than the phrase “sale of
goods.”

Answer 13

True

Question 14

Generally, the UCC § 2-106 governs legal disputes involving “transactions in goods” as well as legal disputes involving “future sales contracts.”

Answer 14

True

Question 15

Generally, the UCC-Article-2 governs disputes involving both the sale of goods and related services.

Answer 15

True

Question 16

Generally, under the Bonebrake test, the UCC-Article-2 governs disputes involving hybrid sale-of-goods and services contracts.

Answer 16

True

Question 17

Generally, the UCC-Article-2 governs disputes involving mixed sale-of-goods and interrelated services contracts

Answer 17

True

Question 18

Under the UCC § 2-204(1), buyers and sellers may fashion and enforce strictly sale-of-services contracts involving various types of services.

Answer 18

False

Question 19

Under the UCC § 2-204(1), buyers and sellers may construct and enforce strictly sale-of-goods contracts involving various types of goods

Answer 19

True

Question 20

Generally, under the predominant purpose test, the UCC-Article-2 governs mixed contractual disputes surrounding the delivery and sale of
goods.

Answer 20

True

Question 21

Generally, under the predominant factor test, the UCC-Article-2 governs disputes involving hybrid delivery and sale-of-goods agreements.

Answer 21

True