Affirmative Defenses - Common Law and UCC

Question 1

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an oral sale-of-goods contract is unenforceable unless it is memorialized.

Answer 1

False

Question 2

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an oral sale-of-goods contract is unenforceable unless it is a totally integrated contact.

Answer 2

False

Question 3

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an oral sale-of-goods contract is unenforceable unless it protects each contractual party’s confidentiality.

Answer 3

False

Question 4

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an express sale-of-goods contract is unenforceable unless it is written and signed.

Answer 4

False

Question 5

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an implied-in-fact sale-of-goods contract is unenforceable unless it is memorialized.

Answer 5

False

Question 6

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, a written sale-of-goods contract that can be performed within one year is unenforceable.

Answer 6

False

Question 7

Generally, under the common-law statute of frauds, an oral sale-of-goods contract is enforceable if it can be performed within 11 months.

Answer 7

True

Question 8

Generally, under the UCC § 2-201(1), a written sale-of-goods contract that cannot be performed within one year is unenforceable.

Answer 8

False

Question 9

Generally, under the UCC § 2-201(1), an oral sale-of-goods contract that cannot be performed within one year is unenforceable.

Answer 9

False

Question 10

Generally, under the UCC § 2-201(1), an oral sale-of-goods contract that cannot be performed within twelve months year is unenforceable.

Answer 10

False

Question 11

Generally, under the UCC § 2-201(1), a written and signed $1,000 sale-of-goods contract that cannot be performed within one year is unenforceable.

Answer 11

False

Question 12

Generally, under the common-law, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of extrinsic evidence that modifies oral sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 12

False

Question 13

Generally, under the common-law, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of extrinsic evidence that contradicts a written and totally integrated sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 13

True

Question 14

Generally, under the common-law, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of prior written evidence that contradicts an oral and totally integrated sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 14

False

Question 15

Generally, under the common-law, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of prior written evidence that alters terms or conditions in a written and totally integrated sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 15

True

Question 16

Generally, under the common-law, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of oral evidence to determine whether a totally integrated written, sale-of-goods contract evolved from fraudulent conduct.

Answer 16

False

Question 17

Generally, under the UCC § 2-202, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of extrinsic evidence that alters conditions in a totally integrated written, sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 17

True

Question 18

Generally, under the UCC § 2-202, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of oral evidence that alters terms or conditions in a totally integrated written, sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 18

True

Question 19

Generally, under the UCC § 2-202, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of oral evidence that contradicts bargained-for-exchanged terms in a totally integrated written, sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 19

True

Question 20

Generally, under the UCC § 2-202, the parol evidence rule prevents the admission of extrinsic evidence to explain ambiguous terms or conditions in a totally integrated written, sale-of-goods contract.

Answer 20

False