intro to tresspas- 1 Flashcards

1
Q

3 forms of trespass to the person

A

battery, assault, false imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what statutory act do we use

A

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what case do we use the rule from

A

Wilkinson v Downton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the purpose of bringing a civil claim in this area

A

compensating due to harm caused by wrongdoing- level of compensation depends on extent of harm caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the standard of proof in ciivl law for this area

A

balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

case for abuse of power and false imprisonment

A

Lumba v Secretary of State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are gendered harms

A

societies ideas of men and women that have led to men in most cases having more power e.g. more male judges than women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how could gendered stereotypes be a negative for society

A

it could all feed into sexual violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pregnancy case for gendered harms

A

-McFarlane v Tayside Health Board

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who has talked about inequalities becoming sexualised

A

Monaghan: ‘gendered harms and the role of tort’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

trespass to the person involves …

A

an infringement of an individual’s personal, mental or bodily integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

trespass to the person is actionable …

A

actionable per se- without proof of loss- violation of the bodily or mental integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the 3 trespass to the person torts are described in what case

A

Collins v Wilcock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is assault

A
  • ‘an act which causes another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force on his person’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is battery

A

the actual infliction of unlawful force on another person’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is false imprisonment

A

-‘the unlawful; imprisonment of constraint on another’s freedom of movement from a particular place’

17
Q

the torts must: cause what? and be committed how?

A
  • Cause a direct and immediate unlawful interference with the claimant’s personal integrity
  • Be committed intentionally (differ from negligence)
18
Q

what does intention mean (2)

A
  • wilful and voluntary act

- subjective recklessness

19
Q

case for intention

A

Letting v Cooper

20
Q

case for subjective recklessness

A
  • Iqbal v Prison Officers Association
21
Q

what does Smith LJ say about intention and torts against the person

A

‘It is well established that all forms of trespass require an intentional act’

22
Q

what 2 things warrant damages

A
  • the unlawful interference

- the consequential harms and losses

23
Q

what was the question asked in Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police

A

could the case go to the HoL after receiving compensation in the form of damages?

24
Q

outcome in Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police

A

HoL said yes case can still be appealed to HoL even after receiving damages

-This is because what the C’s wanted was an indication of their rights, by a court recognizing that the police had intentionally and unlawfully committed battery in the shooting.

25
Q

outcome in Lumba

A

-SC said there was false imprisonment, they had been unlawfully detained- an unlawful policy had been followed and secretary of state had abused power

26
Q

what did the C receive in Lumba

A

nominal damages instead of compensation- a small amount to recognise that harm had been done

27
Q

why did Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Baroness Hale dissent to the nominal damages in Lumba

A

they argued that full compensation should have been awarded because nominal damages would undervalue the wrong of the tort, that the imprisonment was unlawful- it undervalues the right that we should be free from arbitrary detention

28
Q

what is the purpose of taking these criminal act cases to a civil court often about

A

it is about vindicating rights, and trying to ensure that the state is not abusing its powers.