Intro to Pharm - Pechnick Flashcards
What are the different ways to discover a drug? (8)
- Screening natural products
- Testing herbal/traditional medicines
- Molecular modeling
- Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening
- “Me too” drugs
- Son of a drug
- Repurposing/repositioning
- Serendipity
Phase I drug testing
• Uses “normal” volunteers (≈20-80)
o Issues of risk/reward is patient selection
• Determines safety and biological effects
• Efficacy is not studied
• Assesses pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion)
• Time required to complete; months – 1 year
Phase II drug testing
- Studies a small number of patients with the -targeted disease (≈200-300)
- Efficacy is established
- Pharmacokinetics are characterized
- Dose range is determined
- Short-term side effects and risks are assessed
- Highest rate of failure is in Phase II
- Time required to complete; 1 – 2 years
Phase III drug testing
- Large, multi-site sample of patients (hundreds to thousands)
- Safety and efficacy are established
- Drug-Drug interactions are assessed
- Risk-Benefit information is generated
- Time required to complete; 3-5 years
- If successful, a New Drug Application (NDA) is filed with the FDA. FDA review can take 1-2 years.
- If approved the drug can be marketed
Phase IV drug testing
This is the one all physicians are involved in
• Additional uses of the drug are discovered
• Post-Marketing Surveillance
o Identify new or unusual adverse reactions
o Incidence of adverse effects might be low
o Adverse effects might require chronic exposure
o Might occur in higher frequency in subpopulations (gender, age or ethnic)
How long does it take to get a drug to market?
- Approximately 12 years
* Patents last 20 years
How much money does it take to get a drug to market?
From $200 million to $5 billion
FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings: A
Controlled studies in humans show no risk to the fetus
Pure food and drug act of 1906
- Progressive legislation signed by Teddy Roosevelt
- Proof of efficacy not required
- Proof of safety not required
- Required proper labeling
- Limited interstate transport of misbranded/adulterated drugs
- Led to the creation of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Food, drug and cosmetic act of 1938
- Driven by the death of more than 100 children due to a sulfanilamide medication containing diethylene glycol (Massengill Company)
- Proof of safety was required
- Toxicity testing required in animals
- Proof of efficacy not required
- A new drug application (NDA) had to be filed with the FDA prior to approval
Harris-Kefauver amendment 1962
- Both efficacy and safety must be proven
- Required documentation of risk to benefit ratio
- Gave the FDA authority to regulate advertising
- Began to classify all pre-1962 drugs already on the market as effective, ineffective or needing further study.
FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings: B
No evidence of risk in humans. No controlled studies have been conducted in humans; animal studies show no risk to the fetus
FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings: C
Risk cannot be ruled out. No controlled studies have been conducted in humans and animal studies have not been conducted or have shown a risk. Benefits may outweigh risks
FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings: D
Evidence of risk to fetus in humans exists; however, benefits may outweigh risks in limited situations (i.e., life-threatening situations)
FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings: X
Controlled studies in both animals and humans demonstrate fetal abnormalities; the risk outweighs any possible benefit