intro to behavioral finance Flashcards

1
Q

What is an efficient market?

A

An efficient market is one that cannot be beaten and therefore implies holding the market index

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Efficiency assumptions - Prices are efficient because

A

Investors are rational, evaluating information probabilistically.

Prices settle at equilibrium.

Instantaneous price change only when new information arrives.

Prices follow a random walk and are non-random, do not trend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Random price movement

A

Implies stocks should move in a step fashion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Non-random price movement

A

trend can be viewed as a gradual adjustment to new equilibrium (rational) price level

This implies that prices move in waves. This looks more like price charts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does EMH imply?

A

It should rule out the possibility of trading systems.

No one should be able to consistently beat the market.

No payoff for information gathering and processing.

With no new information prices should oscillate in random and unbiased fashion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

False notions of Market Efficiency

A

Price movements are random and at rational values at all times.

No one can beat the market: Practitioners (traders & portfolio managers) have known otherwise and offer us examples that this is not always the case. Ex: Warren Buffett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Semi-strong form efficiency

A

Prices should neither overreact or under react to news, a security’s price adjusts quickly and accurately to news

Prices only change when news arrives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Weak form efficiency

A

Stale, past information already public should have no predictive power – TA fails and does not generate superior risk adjusted returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

“Investors are rational” significance

A

Prices adjust instantaneously, quickly to new information.

Pricing errors are unbiased.

Mistakes of individual investors are uncorrelated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

problems with the “Investors are rational” rationale

A

Investors are not as rational as they appear.

Price adjustment to equilibrium can be gradual, can under or over react – The main disagreement point between FA & TA!

Investor departures from rationality:

–> inaccurate risk assessments

–> they make behavioral mistakes

–> commit poor probability judgments, irrational decision framing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Investor errors are uncorrelated” significance

A

Prices follow a RW & returns are normally distributed

Valuation mistakes are uncorrelated, errors cancel off.

If on investor erroneously values a security too high this will be offset by another investor valuing the same security too low.

These actions cancel out and leave prices at equilibrium levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

problems with the “Investor errors are uncorrelated” rationale

A

This assumption is contradicted by psychological research showing that investors tend to make similar errors and do not deviate from rationality randomly.

Errors can be correlated:

–> A bad buy often times leads to a bad sell

–> herding

–> follow the leader

–> “window dressing,”

–> retail clients act irrationally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Arbitrage forces are possible” assumption of EMH

A

If valuations of irrational investors turn out to be biased, then arbitrage forces prices back to equilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

problems with the “Arbitrage forces are possible” assumption of EMH

A

Arbitrage activities are more limited then it seems.

Does a “Free lunch” really exist? Is arbitrage riskier then it seems?

Improper use of leverage, i.e. hedge funds can get wiped out by using too much (Long Term Capital Management).

Lack of perfect substitutes to hedge.

Limited use of short proceeds and freedom to pursue opportunities.

Cannot always borrow securities at will for short sells.

Therefore, the assumption that arbitrage can always eliminate price inefficiencies is oversimplified and unrealistic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Empirical challenges to EMH

A
  1. Excessive price volatility
  2. Predictability studies with stale/ past information
  3. Predictability studies with excess risk-adjusted returns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Excessive price volatility in EMH

A

Prices are more volatile than fundamentals warrant.

Some price movements cannot be explained by financial analysis:

–> Bubbles.
–> Excessive price movements with no news.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Predictability studies with stale/ past information in EMH

A

Contradict weak-form EMH, which implies that no excess returns are possible on past price information

ex:

Momentum studies: Strong past price momentum over 6-12 months predicts strong future 6-12 momentum

Momentum reversals: strong trends in momentum over prior 3 -5 years tends to reverse

Non reversing momentum: strong momentum persists for stocks near their 52-week highs, despite their fundamentals

Momentum confirmed by volume: strong profits can be earned with combining price/volume with momentum, that’s a great trading system idea!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Predictability studies with excess risk-adjusted returns in EMH

A

Contradict semi-strong form EMH, which implies that no abnormal returns can be made by acting on publicly available technical and fundamental information.

However, many studies have shown that excess risk adjusted returns are possible using past fundamental information:

  1. Small cap effect, January effect
  2. P/E ratio effect: low P/E stocks outperform high P/E ones
  3. P/B effect: low P/B stocks outperform high P/B
  4. Earnings surprise with technical confirmation; better/worse than expected earnings with strong/weak price and volume, another trading system idea!

All these above studies validate TA!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Behavioral Finance (Analysis) or BA

A

The study of how psychology affects finance and investment decisions.

Explains why investors depart from full rationality using elements of cognitive psychology, economics, and sociology

BA says some departures are systematic and last long enough to be exploited by strategies and explains why excess returns can result from stale strategies.

Investors vary in their rationality example: noise traders versus rational arbitrageurs.

Where prices likely diverge from rational levels we are likely to experience systematic predictable movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Pillars of Behavioral finance

A

Limits of arbitrage: lack of perfect substitutes.

Limits of rationality: inefficiencies will occur but under what circumstances?

-> human judgment errors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Conservatism bias

A

too little weight given to new information

Your prior beliefs are not modified as much as new information warrants. You conserve prior beliefs.

i.e. despite signs that the economy starts to emerge from recession you remain pessimistic and underinvested in equities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

an investor’s beliefs become more extreme over time.

Confirmatory information is given more credence, contradictory info not believed.

i.e. any negative news validates your negative bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Anchoring

A

an individual’s inability to sway from initial estimates, forecasts, opinion, personal biases (an anchor) even if they are irrelevant and not evidenced based, sizing a prediction based on numbers previously given.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Anchoring examples

A

Anchoring to compelling emotional stories, numbers (your break even price, initial account balance, price targets set by analysts, prior highs, your account values)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Optimism / Overconfidence

A

Investors are generally overconfident about the quality and precision of their knowledge.

i.e. analysts, portfolio managers, and traders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Crime of small numbers

A

using too small of a sample size to draw a conclusion resulting in two judgment errors:

Gambler’s fallacy

Clustering illusion

27
Q

Gambler’s fallacy

A

occurrence of a positive streak does not alter the probability of the next event

28
Q

Clustering illusion

A

Misperception of order, when the outcomes are truly random, a few events in an ordinary streak in a random walk get interpreted for a trend change

i.e.: a trend of black numbers being drawn in roulette.

29
Q

Imitative behavior / herding

A

looking at behavior of others for cues

People look at the behavior of others for cues and imitate their actions.

Investors making the same mistakes result in prices that systematically diverge from rational levels

i.e.: buy stocks that Warren Buffet and Carl Ichan buy.

Information cascades

Random behavior can trigger imitative behavior resulting in long duration price swings. This is caused by a feedback loop

30
Q

Information cascades

A

chain of imitative behavior initiated by the (random) action of a few.

31
Q

Feedback loops and systems

A

Feedback plays an integral role in price systems

Feedback can be positive or negative

Feedback refers to channeling of a system’s output back into the system as input that forms a circuit or feedback loop leading to a self regulating system

32
Q

Positive feedback

A

system output multiplied by a positive number.

This amplifies, snowballs, a system’s behavior.

ex. Speaker screech, momentum or imitative behavior.

Positive stock gains lead to more positive gains as positive news feeds on itself, price declines lead to more price declines because of immititaive effects. They build on each other. Trends go far above or below rational levels.

33
Q

Negative feedback

A

system output multiplied by a negative number.

This has a dampening effect it drives output back to equilibrium,

ex. A heating or cooling system, arbitrage. Positive/negative moves come back to their original price.

34
Q

Mental accounting

A

contributes to positive feedback

Thinking of money as if it belonged in separate accounts – which should be treated differently.

Ex: Speculative account/money is for more speculation. Investment account is for long term. Treat speculative gains differently

35
Q

Ponzi schemes / Bubbles

A

Robert Shiller contends that bubbles are naturally occurring Ponzi schemes, and also the stock market is a naturally occurring Ponzi (fraud) scheme.

This confirms feedback theory.

36
Q

Self attribution

A

attributing successful results to our own ability (we take credit for positive outcomes), unsuccessful results attributed to “bad luck”.

37
Q

Prospect theory

A

How investors value gains and losses differently.

The decisions they make under uncertainty explains how investors hold on to losers but sell profitable positions to avoid the pain of realizing a loss.

38
Q

Psychological factors, judgment and cognitive errors all investors make

A
  1. Conservatism bias
  2. Confirmation Bias
  3. Anchoring
  4. Optimism / Overconfidence
  5. Crime of small numbers
  6. Imitative behavior / herding
  7. Mental accounting
  8. Ponzi schemes / Bubbles
  9. Self attribution
  10. Prospect theory
39
Q

How can systematic price movement arise in markets that are not fully efficient?

Behavioral finance contentions

A

Price departures are systematic and last long enough to be exploited by certain investment strategies.

Can be formulated as mathematical models that generate testable predictions of how markets would behave if the hypothesis is correct making behavioral finance scientifically meaningful

40
Q

How can systematic price movement arise in markets that are not fully efficient?

conclusion

A

EMH predicts that systematic price motion should not be observed

behavioral finance hypotheses do predict the occurrence of systematic price motion and tries to offer an explanation why, good news for TA!

41
Q

Possibility of price prediction does or does not necessarily imply that markets are inefficient?

A

does not necessarily imply that markets are inefficient

42
Q

why do different risk tolerances exist?

A

because participants are compensated the following kinds of risk premium:

Equity risk premium

Hedge risk transfer premium

Liquidity premium

Information or price discovery premium

43
Q

Equity risk premium

A

returns above the risk free rate.

44
Q

Hedge risk transfer premium

A

compensation of speculators versus commercial hedger (users) for price risk.

i.e. commodity /currency

45
Q

Liquidity premium

A

higher returns for holding illiquid securities or providing liquidity to markets

46
Q

Information or price discovery premium

A

compensates investors for making buy and sell decisions that move prices to rational level

i.e. holding a position overnight

47
Q

Systematic price motion co-existing with Efficiency?

A

Efficient markets and price predictability can co-exist.

Markets can be at times efficient and prices random and at other times be inefficient with predictable prices dependent on investor behavior and cognitive errors.

Behavioral finance offers empirical basis for TA, giving proof to what TA practitioners have already suspected and known but didn’t initially test

48
Q

Finance Disciplines

A

Behavioral Analysis

Fundamental Analysis

Technical Analysis

Quantitative Analysis

49
Q

how are Equity exchanges referred to as?

describe them

A

“auction markets”

Provide an organized and regulated environment for participants to trade securities.

This includes both traditional floor trading and electronic trading.

All trading activity is overseen by IIROC (Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada).

50
Q

Stock exchanges in Canada: (TMX Group)

A

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) Trading in senior securities

Venture Exchange (TSXV) Trading in junior securities

Montreal Exchange (MX) Options trading

51
Q

Main market participants

A

Agency (Broker)

Principal

Market Maker

Arbitrager

52
Q

Market Structure

A

An auction market always displays the “best available price” at any given time.

displayed as the BID and ASK prices at any given time

–> BID is the highest price people are willing to pay.

–> ASK is the lowest price people are willing to sell at.

53
Q

“Market size”

A

Indicates how many shares are available at the BID and ASK prices

54
Q

“Market depth” (Also called level 2 quotes)

A

Indicates how many shares are available at each and every price that is inferior to the BID and superior to the ASK.

55
Q

market order

A

An order for immediate execution at the best available price. No price is specified

56
Q

limit order

A

An order to buy or sell a security at a specific price

A better price may be obtained than the limit specified

57
Q

Stop Sell (Stop Loss)

Order with Stop limit**

A

An order to sell which becomes effective as a market order when the price trades at or below* the “trigger” or stop loss price.

Stop loss orders must be set at a stop price below the current market price.

A stop limit MUST now be used to set a lower boundary.

58
Q

Stop Buy (Buy Stop)

Order with Stop Limit**

A

An order to buy which becomes effective as a market order when the price trades at or above* the “trigger” or stop buy price.

Stop buy orders must always be above the current market price.

A stop limit MUST now be used to set a upper boundary maximum price.

59
Q

Trailing stop order**

A

An stop order that adjusts and follows a stock price by a fixed dollar or percentage amount.

60
Q

Day order

A

An order that is valid for that day only.

61
Q

Good till cancelled

A

An order that is valid until a pre-specified date

62
Q

All or None**

A

An order that can be filled for the specific number of shares at a specific price. No partial fills

63
Q

Market on Close (MOC)

A

An order entered before the close of the exchange (before 3:40 pm for the TSX) to trade at the closing price

This order becomes unmodifiable after this time.