Intro into attachment Flashcards
define attachment
a strong emotional bond reciprocated between 2 people
define reciprocity
how 2 people interact with one another - through signalling and eliciting responses
why are caregiver and infant interactions important
important for childs social development
researchers for reciprocity
- feldman
- brazelton
outline feldmans research into reciprocity
- as baby grows so does interactions
- found babies and caregivers spend alot of time in intense and pleasurable interactions
- at 3 months = interactions become more frequent
outline brazeltons research into reciprocity
- refers reciprocity as a ‘dance’ due to infant and caregiver responding to eachothers moves
- both take on active role
define interactional synchrony
interactional synchrony is when both infant and caregiver’s emotions and actions mirror one another - synchronise
who researched into interactional synchrony
- meltzoff and moore
- isabella
outline the research done by meltzoff and moore
- observed staring of interactional synchrony in babies
- adult made expressions and gestures to baby
- babys actions were then filmed and observed by independent assessor
- association found between expression and actions of babies
what was the association found between infant and adult in meltzoff and moores research into interactional synchrony
association found between gestures and expressions of adult and the babies actions
outline what isabella found an association between when researching interactional synchrony
found association between high levels of synchrony and better quality attachments of mother and infant
evaluation points for intro into attachment (reciprocity and interactional synchrony)
- individual differences (-)
- research to support (+)
- difficult to reliably test infant behaviour (-)
expand on individual differences being an eval point for intro into attachment (reciprocity and interactional synchrony)
- research doesnt consider individual differences between babies
- isabella found strongly attached pairs showed greater interactional synchrony - research against
- assumes all infants respond same way
expand on there being research to support as being eval point for intro into attachment
- research conducted supporting behaviour being intentional
- deyong observed behaviour of infants when interacting with inanimate objects
- found infants had little response
- concludes there is specific social response between humans causing interaction
expand on it being difficult to reliably test infant behaviour as being eval point for intro into attachment
- difficult to replicate again due to difficulty in distinguishing general activity and imitated behaviour
- difficult to know if response is naturally occuring
- meltzoff and moore overcame this by having independent assessors which increased their internal validity
- babies cannot communicate so inferences have to be made