Intoxication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

General rule

A

Does not provide a defence in the true meaning of the word but instead is relevant in determining if D has MR for the offence

It will only work as a defence if it negates the MR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Type of intoxication

A

Needs to be worked out in order to establish if D has MR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Voluntary intoxication

A

D knows and has chosen to take an intoxication substance. e.g. Solvants, Alcohol e.t.c

D will be regarded as voluntarily intoxicated if he knows the effects of a prescribed drug will make him intoxicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Involuntary intoxication

A

D isn’t aware that he has taken an intoxicating substance. e.g. Spiking drink

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Type of crime:

Specific intent

A

Need MR of intention e.g. S18 OAPA or murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Type of crime: Basic intent

A

Need MR of recklessness e.g. S20 OAPA, battery, assault, ABH, involuntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Voluntary intoxication and specific intent offences

A

Voluntary intoxication can negate the MR for a specific intent offence which means that the fact D has intoxicated himself might make him unable to form needed MR of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lipman

A

D will not be convicted of a specific intent offence if the intoxication prevents him from forming the MR of offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sheehan and more

A

Ds were drunk and set fire to homeless men. Because they were drunk, this negated their MR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gallagher

A

If D has the required MR of the specific intent offence, despite being intoxicated, then he will be convicted.

Drunken intent is still intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Voluntary intoxication and basic intent offences: Majewski

A

Voluntary intoxication will never be a defence to basic intent crimes as D will always have been reckless in becoming intoxicated and this can be transferred to satisfy MR of crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Involuntary intoxication and specific intent offences

A

Key issue is identifying if D had MR of specific intent offence at the time of committing the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kingston

A

If D has the MR of the specific intent offence, despite intoxication, he will be guilty.

A drugged intent is still intent.

However, if intoxication negates MR, D won’t be guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Allen

A

To be regarded as involuntary intoxication, the intoxication must be completely involuntary. - if not, it will be treated as voluntary intoxication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Involuntary intoxication and basic intent offences: Hardie

A

When D is involuntarily intoxicated, he has not been reckless in becoming intoxicated. If D has not been reckless in the offence either, then he will not have MR required and will be found not guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly