Duress Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Duress

A

General defence - can be used for any crime; apart from murder and attempted murder (R v Howe and R v Gotts)

Can be used where D has committed the offence because he has been threatened with/ faces death or serious injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 types of Duress

A
  1. Can be through a direct threat by another (duress by threats) e.g R v Howe and R v Gotts
  2. Can be through circumstances (duress by circumstances) e.g R v Dudley and Steven: Cannibalism case - necessity was starvation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Threats of death or serious injury

A

Threat must be of either death or serious injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Valderama - Vega

A

The cumulative effect of threats can be considered provided there are serious threats.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Target of threat

A

It is no longer necessary for the threat to be aimed at the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Shayler

A

Threats must be directed towards D or a person for whom he has responsibility or for whom the situation makes him responsible.

Side note: Threat can be directed at a stranger.

E.g. Where threat is made to set off a bomb unless D performs unlawful act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Connection between threat and offence.

Cole.

A

A connection must exist between the threat and the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The duress test

Part 1

A

Graham - set out a 2 part test:

  1. Was D compelled to act as he did because he reasonably believed he had good cause to fear serious injury or death? (Subjective)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hasan

A

How D subjectively perceives the threat is not the key issue. D must genuinely and reasonably believe that threat would be carried out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The duress test

Part 2

A
  1. If so, would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing D’s characteristics have responded in the same way? (Objective)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Horne

A

Defines a ‘sober person of reasonable firmness’ as an average member of the public, not a hero or a coward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bowen

A

Part 2 of test: Decided which of D’s characteristics could be attributed to the ‘sober person of reasonable firmness’:

  • Age (very young or very old)
  • Pregnancy
  • Serious disability
  • Recognised mental illness
  • Sex - C/A said women have more moral courage

Low IQ is NOT taken into account.

These all affect D’s ability to resist threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Safe avenue of escape

A

Duress can only be used if D is in a situation where he has no safe escape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gill

A

D prevented from using defence of Duress because he should have raised alarm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Imminence of threat

A

Threat must be effective at the time the crime is committed - although it isn’t necessary that threats must be able to be carried out immediately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Abdul - Hussain

A

The threat must operate on D’s mind at the time of committing the act as to overbear his will (this is a matter for the jury to decide).

17
Q

Self - induced duress

A

Where through his own actions, D puts himself in a situation he may need to use duress to commit crimes he cannot use the defence i.e Joining gangs/ becoming indebted to drug dealer/ loan shark.

18
Q

Hasan (Formerly Z)

A

Duress is not allowed where D voluntarily associates with others involved in criminal activity and he foresaw or ought reasonably to have foreseen risk of being subjected to threats of violence.

19
Q

Sharp

A

Gang was violent - threats weren’t

20
Q

Shepherd

A

Gang was not violent usually - used threats of violence.

21
Q

Duress of circumstances

A

D may be forced to act because of the surrounding circumstances rather than a specific threat.

22
Q

Circumstance posing a risk of death or serious injury

Conway

A

D had been previously shot at by two men - successful pleading duress.

23
Q

Martin

A

Confirmed use of Graham test for duress of threats and duress of circumstances.

24
Q

Target

A

Same as duress by threats.

25
Q

Connection between danger and offence

A

Same as duress by threats

26
Q

Safe avenue of escape 2

A

Same as for duress by threats.

27
Q

Imminence of danger

A

Same as for duress by threats.