INTERVIEW (5) Flashcards
TYPES OF INTERVIEWS
selection procedure designed to predict future job performance based on applicants’ oral responses to oral inquiries
Selection Interview
Types based on structuredness:
•Unstructured Interview
•Structured Interview
—follows no set format; interview questionnaire is not prepared
—there is seldom a formal guide for scoring right or wrong answers
—interviewers are not well prepared regarding the questions that are to be asked and in obtaining accurate answers
Sample questions:
Tell me about yourself
Why should we hire you?
What are you strengths and weaknesses?
Unstructured Interview
—directive interview
—pre-planned, precise, and reliable
—lists questions ahead of time, and may even weigh possible alternative answers
for appropriateness
—these are generally the best as all applicants are asked the same questions
•this means that structured interview are more consistent, reliable, and valid
—standardizing interviews enhance job relatedness (provides insights on how the
person would actually do the job) and reduce overall subjectivity (eliminates
bias)
Structured Interview
Types based on content
•Situational Interview
•Behavioral Interview
—asks candidates what their behavior would be in a given situation
—future-oriented
—uses hypothetical situations
sample: Suppose you were faced with…?
Situational Interview
—asks candidates how they reacted to actual situations in the past
—past-oriented
—uses actual situations
—sample: Can you think of a time when…?
—STAR Interview Technique
•asking candidates about particular Situations or
Tasks they faced in the past to uncover the Actions they took and the
Results of said actions
Behavioral Interview
OTHER TYPES:
—semi-structured interview where candidates have to give detailed information about education, work experience, special interests, skills, aptitude, etc.
—asks candidates questions about job-relevant past experiences
—do not focus on either hypothetical or actual situations, but more of
experiences related to the job itself
—all information about the candidate is known first and then interviewer analyzes the expertise and proficiency of the candidate
—sample: What courses did you like best in psychology?
Job-Related Interview or Depth Interview
—seeks to make the candidate uncomfortable with occassionally rude questions
—aim is to spot sensitive applicants and those with high or low stress tolerance
—its invasive and dubious nature demand that the interviewer both be skilled in
its use and ensure that the job requires handling stress
—the candidate who maintains their self-control is normally the right person to
handle a stressful job
—Puzzle interviews can be used to see how candidates think under pressure (e.g.
math problems)
Stress Interview
—not necessarily connected to selection
—conducted for employees who want to leave the organization
—significance is to ascertain the reasons behind leaving the job
Exit Interview
How Interviews are Conducted
—one interviewer and one interviewee
—open-ended or close-ended questions may be used
•Open-ended = involve elaborate explanations of answers
•Close-ended = answerable by yes or no
One-on-One Interview or Individual Interview
—the interview will be stable without any written communication and can be arranged at any place
—no proper procedures of asking questions and not adequately structured
—informal conversation between individuals and takes place in a friendly manner
Informal Interview
—candidate will be aware about the dates and timings of the interview well in advance and the interviewer plans and prepares the interview
—a.k.a planned interview
Formal Interview/Planned Interview
—several persons interview the applicant, in sequence, one-on-one, and make a hiring decision
—unstructured sequential interview calls for each interviewer generally asking questions as they come to mind
—structured sequential interview calls for each interviewer rating the candidates on a
standard evaluation form using standardized questions
Sequential (or Serial) Interview
—a.k.a board interview
—conducted by a team of interviewers who together question each candidate
—they combine their ratings of each candidate’s answers into a final panel score
—enables interviewers to ask follow-up questions and may elicit more meaningful
responses
—this may also be more stressful on the part of the interviewee so they may inhibit
answers
—its main difference with sequential interviews is the fact that panel interviews are done with the team of interviewers in the same meeting with the candidate, while in sequential interview, each team member interviews the candidate at their own separate time
Panel Interview/Board Interview
—a panel interviews several candidates simultaneously
—even more stressful variant of panel interview
—conducted to save time when there are large number of applications received for limited vacancies
—the panel may pose a problem, then watches to see which candidate takes the lead in formulating an answer
Mass Interview or Group Interview
—conducting interiews via phone
—can be more useful than face-to-face interviews for judging one’s conscientiousness, intelligence, and interpersonal skills
—each party can focus on answers because they need not worry about appearances
—unplanned calls from the interviewer allow for spontaneous answers
Phone Interviews
—candidate’s oral or keyed replies are obtained in responsed to computerized oral, visual, or qritten questions and/or situations
—most present a series of multiple-choice questions regarding relevant background
information about the candidate
—some confront candidates with realistic scnarios to which they must respond
Computer-Based Job Interviews
uses online teleconferencing applications
requires little special preparation for employers
Online Video Interviews
Errors That Can Undermine an Interview’s Usefulness
—interviewers tend to make snap judgments during the first few minutes of the interview
—first impressions are especially damaging when the prior information is negative
•being given an unfavorable reference letter before the interview
—interviewers are more influenced by unfavorable than favorable information about the candidate
—impressions are more likely to change from favorable to unfavorable than from
unfavorable to favorable
First Impressions (Snap Judgments)