Interpreting Epidemiological Findings (1) Flashcards

1
Q

What are the Bradford hill criteria?

A
Strength
Consistency
Specificity
Temporality
Biological Gradient
Plausibility
Coherence
Experiment
Analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does strength mean?

A

A stronger association increases the confidence that an exposure causes an outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does consistency mean?

A

Consistent findings across settings tends to rule of errors or fallacies that might befall between studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does specificity mean?

A

Specificity can be informative when present but its absence convey very little

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is temporality?

A

Measuring over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is biological gradient?

A

A dose-response effect is a compelling argument for causality

e.g. consuming more cigarettes increases likelihood of disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is plausibility?

A

Relationship should be biologically plausible where the science is understood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is coherence?

A

The association ought to be consistent with the existing theory and knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is experiment?

A

Evidence from experimentation should be supportive of the proposed link

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is analogy?

A

Drawing upon analogous findings, we many make inference on the relationship

e.g. rubella causes deafness so you could consider that other viruses can cause similar issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is bias?

A

Any trends in the collection, analysis, interpretation, publication or review of data that can lead to conclusions that are systematically different from the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three types of bias?

A

Selection
Information
Compounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is internal validity?

A

The extent to which findings accurately describe the relationship between exposure and outcome in the context of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is external validity?

A

Generalisiability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What can selection bias also be called?

What is selection bias?

How can you avoid selection bias?

A

Berkson’s bias (in hospitals)
Healthy worker effect (occupational studies)

Occurs when individuals or groups in a study differ systematically from target population leading to a systematic error in an association or outcome

Controls representative of target population
Minimise non-response (i.e declining to participate)
Compare respondents with non respondents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is information bias?

A

Due to a number reasons we have misclassification of the exposure or disease status (or both)

Can include: interviewer, recall, response, and diagnostic bias

17
Q

What is interviewer bias?

A

Interviewers ask about exposure status

Might be more thorough in interviewing on a related topic if disease status is known

e.g. smoking history in those with lung cancer

18
Q

What is recall bias?

A

When people become ill they are more likely to think hard about how past experiences have affected them

e.g. more likely to remember a brief period of smoking many years ago if you have been diagnosed with lung cancer

19
Q

What is non-differential misclassification?

A

When exposure status is misclassified but equally among controls and cases

Errors in determining outcome in controls and cases

Bias always towards the null

20
Q

What is differential misclassification?

A

Misclassification of exposure is not equal between cases and controls