INTERNATIONAL TRADE Flashcards

1
Q

FREE TRADE

A

a market environment where buyers and sellers can make transactions without government intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

VOLUNTARY TRADE IS MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL x8

A

lower prices

taking advantage of resources endowments

economies of scale

increased variety/choice

acquisition of needed resources

competition can improve efficiency

political benefits

efficiency and exports = growth and development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

KEY ECONOMISTS

A

Adam Smith–> benefits of specialization

David Ricardo–> comparative advantage theory

Frederic Bastiat–> ridicule of market restrictions

James Ingram–> magic of free trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ABSOLUTE ADVANTAGE

A

the situation that occurs in comparative advantage theory

when one country can produce more of a given product

with the same or less resources

than another country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

A

when a country produces a good at a lower domestic opportunity cost than another country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

OUTPUT MODEL

A

opp cost X= output of Y/ output of X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

INPUT MODEL

A

opp cost of X= input of X/ input of Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

WHAT DOES COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE INDICATE?

A

what a country ought to specialise in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SOURCES OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE?

A

resource endowments

  1. relative abundance of the resource
  2. value of the good produced from the resource to the world market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

A
  1. perils of extreme specialization

2. unrealistic assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

PERILS OF EXTREME SPECIALIZATION

A

relative prosperity of a country dependent on the value of the good

if the good is a commodity, the country’s entire income is bound to the price of the commodity

= risk to the population’s well being + volatility

long term concern: will the country be trapped in a certain type of production= limiting its potential for full development

comp ad in agricultural goods…
the kind of structural change necessary for developing might never happen

no dev of industry or service sector

= low standards of living and relative dependency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS

A
  1. transport costs are irrelevant to the theory
  2. goods are assumed to be identical
  3. perfect information about the availability and prices of all available goods is impossible
  4. the two- country model is unrealistic
  5. full employment: a necessary condition of the theory, rarely occurs in practice
  6. the assumption that countries practice free trade is highly debatable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
the assumption that countries practice free trade is highly debatable

A
  • -> many countries still protect their markets

- -> with tariffs, quotas, subsidies and bureaucratic barriers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
full employment: a necessary condition of the theory, rarely occurs in practice

A

–>dev countries have massive unE and inefficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
the two- country model is unrealistic

A
  • -> making the determination of comparative advantage rather difficult
  • ->however multi-country analysis is possible with appropriate mathematical modeling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
perfect information about the availability and prices of all available goods is impossible

A
  • ->given the vast nature of the global markets

- -> determining one’s one comp ad is v difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
goods are assumed to be identical

A
  • -> goods have some differentiation
  • -> esp. in the world of manufactured goods
  • -> difficult to assess true comp ad when the goods are not the same
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

LIMITATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
UNREALISTIC ASSUMPTIONS
transport costs are irrelevant to the theory

A
  • ->but cannot be ignored in practice

- -> they can raise costs enough to eliminate a comparative advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

WTO

A

only international organization dealing with global rules of trade between nations

its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

AIMS OF THE WTO x5

A
  1. trade w/o discrimination
  2. freer trade through negotiation
  3. predictability through binding and transparency
  4. promoting fair competition
  5. encouraging development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

FUNCTION OF WTO

A
  1. provide forum for trade negotiation
  2. execute WTO agreements
  3. evaluate and rule on trade complaints by member countries
  4. provide technical assistance to dev countries on trade issues
  5. track changes in member trade policies
22
Q

AIMS OF THE WTO

1. trade w/o discrimination

A

all subscribed to “most favoured nation status”
= goods from all WTO member countries are treated equally

a tariff applied to one is a tariff applied to all

no real favourites

foreign goods treated as the same as domestic goods

23
Q

AIMS OF THE WTO

2. freer trade through negotiation

A

changes of trade policy are done by direct gradual dealing

affected countries have time to prepare for adjustments

24
Q

AIMS OF THE WTO

3. predictability through binding and transparency

A

binding= the commitment among members to keep tariffs at or below certain rates

allows importers to assess markets more accurately and make better decisions about trade

openness about trade rules encourages more trade

25
AIMS OF THE WTO | 4. promoting fair competition
rules against dumping and intellectual property theft are aimed at increasing fair competition generally the creation of a system of trade rules promotes fair play by establishing some fundamental guidelines for most trade
26
AIMS OF THE WTO | 5. encouraging development
nearly 2/3 of members are dev countries these countries are granted special trade concessions because it is assumed that their industries need time and space to grow to a level of direct global competition
27
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO
1. promotes peace 2. place to handle disputes 3. based on rules rather than power 4. cuts the cost of living 5. greater consumer and variety 6. trade boosts income 7. trade increases economic growth 8. WTO system encourages efficiency/simplicity 9. shield country from narrow interests 10. same rules create good incentives for better government
28
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 1. promotes peace
by increasing trade relationships between countries WTO help reduce conflict 'sales people rarely fight their customers' 1930s Europe competed to raise barriers, which contributed to WW1 post WW1 Europe has grown increasingly integrated by trade and its peace
29
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 2. place to handle disputes
providing a dispute process with a schedule of negotiation as part of the early stages WTO encourages compromise
30
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 3. based on rules rather than power
WTO often judges rich countries to be violators of trade policy rule based system helps protect smaller, poorer trade partners
31
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 4. cuts the cost of living
when countries produce based on efficiencies and comparative advantage the cost of food, clothes and other necessities are cheaper WTO notes that rich countries primarily the EU and the US sub their farmers with 1 billion dollars a day
32
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 5. greater consumer and variety
trade gives consumers worldwide access to goods meaning any consumer can shop according to their preferences more luxury goods are available as well as a variety of cheaper consumer goods
33
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 6. trade boosts income
1929 uruguay round increased Y from $109-510 billion income can be used by gov to improve services and infrastructure however producers protest when inefficient industries face competition
34
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 7. trade increases economic growth
increase in employment depends on the countries transitional policies
35
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 8. WTO system encourages efficiency/simplicity
certainty about trade rules transparency about the rules and predictability about the trading environment all encourage trade and efficiency
36
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 9. shield country from narrow interests
when asked to enact forms of protectionism national gov resist as they want to be seen as playing by international rules govs are better off to ignore special interest groups
37
SUPPORTERS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 10. same rules create good incentives for better government
short term special interest lobbying and corruption are more difficult to enact when everyone knows the rules (transparency) and the gov is pledged to support them
38
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO x9
1. favour rich countries 2. trade between rich countries 3. poor countries can't afford trade representatives 4. rich countries get richer faster 5. uruguay round has not addressed tariff escalation 6. agricultural subsides in rich countries have not been reduced 7. the protection of intellectual property rights 8. bureaucratic barriers 9. commercial interests in mind
39
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 1. favour rich countries
despite the claims to equalize trade environment these countries bring large groups of trade negotiators, far more than smaller countries many agreements are made w/o consultation of smaller countries G20 formed by Brazil and India to rep dev countries
40
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 2. trade between rich countries
negating the claim that trade benefits everyone
41
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 3. poor countries can't afford trade representatives
no representation in trade negotiations
42
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 4. rich countries get richer faster
oxfam international 'with only 14% of the world's population, high income countries account for 75% of global GDP' which is approximately the same share as in 1990'
43
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 5. uruguay round has not addressed tariff escalation
developed countries have kept tariffs on raw materials and primary goods imported while maintaining much higher tariffs on the semi-processed and higher value goods made from the raw materials = keeps low cost competition from LDCs in the semi-processed and higher value industries prevents LDCs from diversifying their production increasing the risk of overspecialization
44
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 6. agricultural subsides in rich countries have not been reduced
despite pledges by countries signing up to the uruguay round these subs depress world prices and reduce production in developing markets that would otherwise export to the developed world
45
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 7. the protection of intellectual property rights
keeps innovation form spreading quickly to dev countries
46
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 8. bureaucratic barriers
as tariffs are dropped by successive rounds of trade agreements rich countries appear to be resorting to bureaucratic barriers e.g. product standards to keep goods out
47
CRITICS' VIEW OF THE WTO | 9. commercial interests in mind
WTO agreements ignore cases of worker exploitation, rights and issues WTO does little to encourage environmental protection the promotion of trade empowers MNCs to campaign for relaxed environmental protection and worker standards
48
RICHER ECONOMIES THAT ARE OPEN TO TRADE GROW FASTER..
poor countries grow richer when more open to trade, as recent successes in India and China have helped to demonstrate
49
RICH COUNTRIES ARE MORE PROTECTIONIST THAN POOR ONES..
not true, since poor countries tend to have higher av tariffs than rich ones
50
AGRICULTURAL PROTECTIONISM IN THE RICH WORLD WORSENS GLOBAL POVERTY...
if subs were removed, food prices will rise these increases could hurt nutrition levels in some poor countries that rely on food imports