International Studies - Post Midterm Flashcards
Qualitative Research (4 main points)
concerned primarily with words and images Usually inductive Tends to be interpretivist Constructionist Takes naturalist perspective
naturalist perspective
When doing research, the social world should be left as undisturbed as possible
Constructionist
Social life not seen as fixed, but constructed from interactions and negotiations
interpretivist
Concerned with finding out what an action or event means to those involved
inductive
Starts with field research ⇒ concepts and theories
Steps in Qualitative Research (eight)
- Establish a general research question
- Select a relevant site and subjects: Where is the research being conducted and who are the research subjects?
- Collect the data–determine which methods to use
- Interpret the data–determine meanings that research subject put to activities
- Conceptual and theoretical work–evaluate the data related to your research question
- Tighter specification of the research question and
- Collection of further data
- Writing up and findings/conclusions–the researcher must prove the credibility of the research and why it matters
Theories used in Qualitative research
often grounded theory
- Use of data to develop theories
- May involve an iterative process: going back and forth from data to theory
Begin with abroad definition of a concept and narrow it down through the research process
Definitive concepts
defined with nominal and operational definitions, as in quantitative research
Sensitizing concepts
provide only general sense of reference and guidance as to the content of the concept
Difficulties in qualitative research
achieving external reliability due to ever changing circumstances
achieving external validity due to small sample sizes
Methods in qualitative research
Ethnography
External Validity
Degree to which a study can be replicated
Can the findings be generalized across social settings?
Internal Validity
Do different observers see the same things?
Is there a good match between what is observed and the resulting theoretical ideas?
Trustworthiness (Lincoln and Guba)
Credibility
Transferability
Dependability
Confirmability
Credibility
- Do the people studied agree with the interpretation of their thoughts and actions offered by the researcher?
- Conducted through respondent (member) validation
Transferability
- Can findings be applied to contexts/people not studied?
- ’Thick’ description tells us if transferability is possible
Dependability
- Were proper procedures followed?
- Can the study’s theoretical inferences can be justified?
Confirmability
Was the researcher objective and unbiased?
Authenticity
speaks to integrity and quality of qualitative research process (constructivist)
- Fairness
- Ontological authenticity
- Educative authenticity
- Catalytic authenticity
- Tactical authenticity
Fairness
Evenhanded representation of all viewpoints
Ontological authenticity
- Construction and reconstruction of a person’s perspective as it becomes more sophisticated
- Consciousness-raising of sociopolitical, economic, cultural contexts
Educative authenticity
Increased understanding of and respect for the values of others & how these values frame their perspectives
Catalytic authenticity
Research process my facilitate, stimulate, or evoke action
Tactical authenticity
Holds inquirer (constructivist word for ’researcher’) and the research process to standard of effective (from points-of-view of stakeholders) change
Goals of Qualitative Research
- Empathy / empathetic understanding
- Comprehensive description and emphasis on context
- Behavior can ’make sense’ when context is described
- Behavioral observation in its own environment 3. Emphasis on process
- How do events and patterns form over time
- Long time ’in the field’ allows researcher to understand change and its context - Flexibility and limited structure
- Questions tend to be quite general
- Early on little theory driving research
- Topics explored may change during research process
Critiques of Qualitative Research
Can be too impressionistic and subjective
Bias can result from personal relationships built during research
Difficult to replicate - Reactive effect can be expected
Problems of generalization: is that always a bad thing?
Often a lack of transparency
Participant observation
refers to the observational
component of ethnographic work
How do we observe behaviour?
in an unstructured way, and often in-depth, unstructured discussions and interviews are held with the people studied.
Two dimensions of interview/ observation access
Nature of Disclosure, and
Setting
Two Natures of Disclosure
’Overt’: the people being studied know they are being observed by a researcher
’Covert’: the people being studied do not know they are being observed by a researcher
Two types of settings in interviews/research
’Open’/public settings: e.g., public parks, downtown sidewalks, etc.
- May be difficult to make observations and talk to people
’Closed’: i.e., private or restricted settings: meetings of private clubs, social movement organizational centres, etc.
Drawbacks to having key informants
- Researcher may ignore other group members
- Key informant’s view may not be representative of the group
as a whole
4 roles for Ethnographers
Complete participation
Participant-as-observer
Observer-as-participant
Complete observer
Complete participation (ethnography)
- Covert operations
- Researcher adopts a secret role in the group
- Method gets closest to participants and their activities
- Risk of over-identification or developing a strong dislike of the participants
- Involvement
Participant-as-observer (ethnography)
- Researcher adopts a role in the group
- Participants aware who the researcher is
- Risk of reactivity–subjects’ behaviour changes b/c they know they are being studied
Observer-as-participant (ethnography)
- Researcher observes and interviews from the periphery
* * Risk of reactivity & incorrect interpretation of activity
Complete observer (ethnography)
- Researcher does not engage the participants at all
- No risk of reactivity
- Limited info for understanding actions of participants
- Detachment
Types of Field Notes
Mental notes
* Remember and write later
Jotted notes (scratch or rough notes)
* Brief notes made at time to jog memory when writing detailed notes later
Full field notes
* Detailed notes of what was seen, heard and reflection on situations
* Include comments on possible reactivity Analytic memos
* Link observations to concepts & theories that may apply
* Notes on data not data notes
Visual Ethnography (two approaches)
Realist
- the material depicted treated as ’factual’, objective reality
Reflective
- consideration of how the researcher influenced what the materials reveal
e.g., the researcher’s ideological views may have affected what was depicted and how it was depicted
- this approach recognizes that the visuals may be ’collaborative’, and may be subject to multiple interpretations by different people
Difficulties with Using Visual Ethnography
Stem from interpretation
- Context of when, where, how, and by whom the visual material was taken
- Different meanings may be ascribed to the visual material by the researcher and by different participants
- Potential for researcher to influence the perception of the subject
How do qualitative researchers decide when to bring their research to a close?
Because there are no theories to be tested, research and development of theory can go on indefinitely
- One place to stop is when categories are saturated
- New data does not result in new concepts or categories, or in an elaboration of existing concepts or categories