INTERNAL FACTORS Flashcards
What are the 3 Internal Factors of Ethnic Differences in Education?
(1) ANTI - SCHOOL SUBCULTURES
(2) LABELLING, IDENTITIES AND RESPONSES
(3) INSTITUTIONAL RACISM
Explain ARCHER’S 3 DIFFERENT IDENTITIES for - Anti-school subcultures and Pupil Identities
ARCHER - 3 Different Pupil Identities
- IDEAL PUPIL IDENTITY: a WHITE MIDDLE CLASS MASCULINE IDENTITY, with a normal sexuality. This pupil is seen as achieving in the ‘Right’ way, through natural ability and initiative
- PATHOLOGISED PUPIL IDENTITY : an ASIAN , ‘DESERVING POOR; FEMINISED IDENTITY either a sexual or with an oppressed sexuality. This pupil is seen as a plodding, conformist and culture bound ‘OVERACHIEVER ’ , a slogger who SUCCEEDS through HARD WORK RATHER than NATURAL ability
- DEMONISED PUPIL IDENTITY: a BLACK or WHITE W/C HYPER-SEXUALISED IDENTITY. This pupil is seen as an Unintelligent, peer-led, Culturally Deprived Underachiever
What is the Link between Ethnic Minorities and being demonised and pathologised? - Anti-school subcultures and Pupil Identities
ETHNIC MINORITIES are MORE LIKELY to be SEEN as DEMONISED or PATHOLOGISED
What does ARCHER argue about CHINESE people?b- Anti-school subcultures and Pupil Identities
Negative positive stereotype
ARCHER argues that EVEN those MINORITY PUPILS who PERFORM SUCCESSFULLY CAN BE PATHOLOGISED ( seen as abnormal)
e.g. Chinese, praised and viewed negatively
CHINESE students were SEEM as having ACHIEVED SUCCESS IN the ‘WRONG’ WAY - through HARDWORKING, passive conformism RATHER than NATURAL INDIVIDUAL ABILITY .
This meant that they COILD NEVER LEGITIMATELY occupy the IDENTITY of ‘IDEAL PUPIL’
What does ARCHER Conclude about CHINESE people and Ethnic Minorities? - Anti-school subcultures and Pupil Identities
the result is that even the SUCCESS of ETHNIC MINORITY PUPILS will ONLY be SEEN as ‘OVER-ACHIEVEMENT’ since ‘PROPER’ ACHIEVEMENT is SEEM to be the NATURAL PRESERVE of the PRIVILEGED WHITE M/C IDEAL PUPIL
How do PUPILS Respond to LABELS?
What does FULLER say about those ABLE to REJECT Negative Labels
FULLER (1984) - STUDIED a group of YEAR 11 BLACK GIRLS in a LONDON
- UNTYPICAL - high achievers
- GIRLS channeled their Anger into the ‘pursuit’ of educational success’
- DIDN’T seek Teachers Approval
- DIDN’T LIMIT themselves in terms of FRIENDSHIP GROUPS
- CONFORMED ONLY in terms of SCHOOLWORK
- MAINTAINED a POSITIVE SELF IMAGE by RELYING on their OWN EFFORTS
- PUPILS can STILL SUCCEED even WHEN they CHOOSE not to CONFORM
How do PUPILS Respond to LABELS?
What does MIRZA say about those UNABLE to REJECT Negative Labels
MIRZA - studied ambitious BLACK GIRLS who faced teacher racism
MIRZA FOUND that RACIST TEACHERS DISCOURAGED BLACK PUPILS from BEING AMBITIOUS through the KIND of ADVICE they gave them ABOUT CAREERS and OPTION CHOICES
A large majority of teachers in the study held RACIST ATTITUDES
What were the 3 MAIN TYPES OF TEACHER RACISM that MIRZA identified for those Unable to Reject Negatuve labels
- the COLOUR-BLIND ; Teachers who BELIEVE BLACK PUPILS are CULTURALLY DEPRIVED and who HAVE LOW EXPECTATIONS of them
- the LIBERAL CHAUVINISTS : Teachers who BELIEVE BLACK PUPILS are CULTURALLY DEPRIVED and who HAVE LOW EXPECTATIONS of them
- the OVERT RACISTS : teachers who BELIEVE BLACKS are INFERIOR and ACTIVELY DISCRIMINATE against them
Name SEWELL’S 4 Responses to Labelling that he Identified?
- the REBELS
- the CONFORMISTS
- the RETREATISTS
- the INNOVATORS
Explain THE REBELS in SEWELL’S Responses to Labelling that he Identified
the MOST VISIBLE and INFLUENTIAL GROUP, but they were ONLY a SMALL MINORITY of BLACK PUPILS.
They were OFTEN EXCLUDED from school.
They REJECTED both the GOALS and the RULES OF the SCHOOL
they BELIEVED in their OWN SUPERIORITY based on the idea that black masculinity equates with sexual experience and virility
they were CONTEMPTUOUS of WHITE BOYS
Explain THE CONFORMISTS in SEWELL’S Responses to Labelling that he Identified
were a LARGE GROUP
These boys were KEEN to SUCCEED, ACCEPTED the SCHOOL’S GOALS and had FRIENDS from DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS
They weren’t part of a subculture and we were ANXIOUS to AVOID being STEREOTYPED either by teachers or their peers
Explain THE RETREATISTS in SEWELL’S Responses to Labelling that he Identified
tiny MINORITY of ISOLATED INDIVIDUALS who were DISCONNECTED from Both School and Black Subcultures, and were DESPISED by the REBELS
Explain THE INNOVATORS in SEWELL’S Responses to Labelling that he Identified
2nd largest group
they were PRO-EDUCATION but ANTI-SCHOOL.
they VALUED SUCCESS , but DIDN’T seek the APPROVAL of TEACHERS and CONFORMED only AS FAR as SCHOOLWORK itself was concerned
What does GILBORN and MIRZA argue to do with - Labelling and Teacher Racism
GILBORN & MIRZA (2000) - in one local education authority , BLACK CHILDREN were the HIGHEST ACHIEVERS on ENTRY to PRIMARY SCHOOLS
By GCSE = the WORST result of ANY ETHNIC GROUP
What are GENERAL POINTS to do with Labelling and Teacher
Racism aswell as a point from BORUNE
BLACK and ASIAN pupils seen as NOT the ‘IDEAL PUPIL’
BLACK pupils MORE LIKELY to be PLACED in LOWER SETS / streams due to NEGATIVE STEREOTYPING
Higher levels of Exclusions from school for Black Boys - BOURNE (1994) - SCHOOLS see BLACK BOYS as a THREAT