Intercultural Contact Flashcards
What is the contact hypothesis? (Allport, 1954)
Contact between different cultural groups has positive effects,
provided certain conditions (Allport, 1954)
- Equal status between the groups within the situation
- Common goals
- Cooperation between groups (interdependence)
- Authority/Institutional support for the contact.
Contact: what to assess
-quantity: frequency of interaction
(how often we meet, talk, socialize
with)
- quality: nature of interaction (how
positive, negative, friendly, …)
- new trends: frequency X
quality/intensity
How does the contact theory work?
contact reduces anxiety and threat, increases knowledge and empathy. The positive outcome is prejudice reduction
which role plays status in the contact theory?
contact works better for majorities/high status
groups than for minorities. result = status assymetry
types of generalization?
Situational: do the changes generalize across situations? * Individual to group: do the changes generalize from the specific
outgroup members with whom there is contact to the outgroup? * To uninvolved outgroups: do the changes toward the outgroup
generalize to other outgroups not involved in the contact?
what is the Secondary Transfer Effect (STE) of Intergroup Contact and what are the outcomes?
contact with a primary outgroup reduces prejudice toward secondary groups that are not directly involved in the contact. Focal outcomes: Prejudice reduction, tolerance building
what does the Tertiary Effect of Intergroup Contact mean and what are the outcomes?
contact with a primary group even enhances cognitive functioning beyond intergroup relations. focal outcomes: increased creativity, productivity, and problem-solving flexibility
what forms of contact do exist?
direct: face-to-face interaction
indirect: no face-to-face
extended: knowing that ingroup members have outgroup friends: + attitudes and willingness to engage in contact
parasocial: intergroup contact via
media, when the audience “simply observes outgroups”
imagined: the mental simulation of a social interaction with an outgroup member
e-contact: “computer mediated contact involving an engagement of self in the intergroup relationship”
what is vicarious contact?
“direct observation of a positive interaction between ingroup and outgroup members, …. acquire new responses, or modify the existing ones”
what are the different groups who ‘move’?
tourists, international students, expatriates, immigrants and refugees
what does acculturation mean?
process of cultural and
psychological change that results from contact
between cultures.
what does acculturation as assimilation mean?
minorities expected to let
go elements of their native culture, and adopt culture of
their new country of settlement
what changes brings acculturation?
- affect: stress and coping approach, focus on emotional responses, well being, life satisfaction
- behavoiur: culture learning approach, acquisition of
culture-specific skills and appropriate behaviors,
intercultural communication, etc - culture orientations/cognitions: categorization, social
identity, who am I, who are we/they
4, development; consider developmental changes in
acculturation, process-in-context - identity
what are the different components in Berry’s bidimensional model (attitudes of immigrant groups)?
assimilation, integration, marginalization, separation
what are the acculturation strategies of the larger society?
Integration, assimilation, segregation, exclusion
what does psychological adaptation mean?
captures the affective dimension
of adjustment (e.g., psychological well-being, lower stress,
life satisfaction)
what does sociocultural dimension mean?
behavioral dimension or “the
acquisition of culturally appropriate skills and the
demonstration of functionally adaptive behaviors”
how can you replace the contact dimension?
by measuring how much
ethnic minority members value culture adoption of
dominant group/mainstream society.
what is the critique to Berry’s model?
focused on immigrant perspective only * Contact vs Culture Adoption
* ignores context and intergroup relations dynamics
between migrant groups and receiving society (next class)* no “best” strategy (later today) * acculturation strategy as a “choice”
* Weak to non existent relation of integration and
adaptation!