Interceptive Orthodontics Flashcards
Interceptive orthodontics
- ‘any procedure that will reduce or eliminate the severity of a developing malocclusion’
general practitioners need to be able to spot
- refer when needed
3 characteristics of deciduous dentition
incisors more upright
spaced
wear - thin layer of enamel
eruptioins of deciduous dentition
6 months - 2.5 years
a-b-d-c-e
lowers before uppers
no spacing in deciduous dentition ->
66% will develop crowding
<3mm spacing in deciduous dentition ->
50% crowding
3-6mm spacing in deciduous dentition ->
20% crowding
>6mm in deciduous dentition ->
no crowding
what is likely if there is missing or double teeth in deciduous dentiton
- fusion of central and lateral incisor
- likely Absent permanent successor
eruption dates permanent dentitions
6s
6 years
1s
7years
2s
8years
4s
10years
3s and 5s
11-12years
7s
12-13years
variation exists
6s erupt
6 years
1s eruot
7 years
2s erupt
8 years
4s eruot
10 years
3s and 5s erupt
11-12 years
7s erupt
12-13 years
early mixed dentition
6-8 years
6s, 1s, 2s erupted
late mixed dentition
10-13 years
4s, 3s and 5s, 7s
lower labial crowding that can improve spontaneously
up to 3.5mm of crowding may spontaneously improve
- Primary canines present with permanent incisors
Grow transversely naturally and improve (3.5mm till 10)
antropoid spacing
space that is localized mesial to the upper primary canine and distal to the lower primary canine
ugly duckling stage effect on upper incisors
spaced upper incisors
- diastema
- laterals pointing distally
- upper canines leaning against upper distal aspect of lateral roots as the 3s erupt the spacing will disappear
Despite mixed dentition looking spaced it is common to have crowding (need to fit in 3, 4, 5 between 2 and 6)
size of diastema that will close naturally
<2.5mm should close between mixed and permanent dentition transition
frenectomy has little effect on longterm closure of diastema - not advocated
% diastemas at 6 yeards Vs 12 Years
6years 96% have diastema
12years 7% have diastema (3’s erupted – more space than c)
what is not advocated for diastema management
frenectomy - little effect on long term closure
4 things needed to know about development of mixed dentition
- knowledge of normal
- sequence
- symmetry
- chronological guidelines
issue here
Issue in sequence of eruption
- Deciduous upper centrals (attrition and erosion worn)
- But have both permanent laterals
Shouldn’t – CENTRALS BEFORE LATERALS
- History, examination and radiographs – something wrong
issue here
symmetry
- Contralateral tooth should erupt within 6 months
Upper right central fully erupted – not left one
- But left lateral has -> alarm
3 causes for unerupted central incisors
- supernumeraries
- trauma/dilaceration
- other pathology
management of supernumeraries
- Remove deciduous and supernumeraries
- Create space
- Expose/bond
- Monitor (>1.5years)
- Most will erupt between 1.5-2 years
Bond onto unerupted tooth possible (chain to pull down) or should just make space for it - debate
- 80% 16 months Av. If you only make the space
what is not allowing 21 to erupt?
Present but supernumerary tooth bocking eruption
history and exam for trauma causing issue in eruption sequence
dilaceration
History – ask about trauma
- Usually remembered as significant
Exam
- Palpate to see where incisor has gone
- Radiograph – see it is displaced
- Trauma to deciduous tooth transmits force up to hertwigs root sheath
- Bend
- Significant – no way can line up as part will be exposed if crown straight (non vital)
- Need removed
- Bend
- Trauma to deciduous tooth transmits force up to hertwigs root sheath
issue here
- Symmetry and sequence issues*
- 11 but no 21, 22 has started to erupt*
3 aetiology possibilities of median diastema
- Normal (small teeth)?
- Supernumerary? 10%
- Missing teeth?
radiograph
7 cases for interceptive orthodontics
- impacted 6s
- potential crowding
- early loss of deciduoud teeth
- carious 6s
- cross-bites
- transposed teeth
- habits
leeway space
normal development
difference between e,d,c and 3,4,5
- Mandibular 2.5mm
- Maxillary 1.5mm
deciduous teeth wider than permanent teeth
Measure from mesial 6 to distal 2 – want to have 18.5mm for no crowding
mm spacing for no crowding
18.5mm
measure from mesial 6 to distal 2
balancing
take contralateral on other side of same arch
compensating
take out opposing tooth
early loss of deciduous teeth effects
localises crowding
effect varies with
- crowding
- age
- arch
crowding effect on early loss of deciduous teeth
more crowding = greater balance
age impact of early loss of deciduous teeth
loss early = larger than if naturally about to lose
management techniques of early loss of deciduous teeth
- Balancing – take contralateral on other side of same arch
- Compensating – take out opposing tooth
management early loss As and Bs
little impact
don’t balance or compensate
management early loss of Cs
balance
- midline will shift - unless very spaced
- as permanent incisors are present
management of early loss of Ds
small CL shift - balance if already under GA potentially
management of early loss of Es
- Not to balance – no effect on centre line
- Major space loss
- significant mesial drift of 6 – compound a future crowding issue (less space for 3, 4, 5)
- Upper > lower rate of mesial drift
which arch has a faster rate of mesial drift
upper > lower
significant mesial drift of 6s if Es lost early - compound a future crowding issue (less space for 3, 4, 5)
when to assess carious 6s
assessment at 9 years
- any doubts re long term prognosis - refer for advice
6s extraction general rules in relation to both arches (class 1) 3
- If extracting lower take upper
- Don’t balance with sound tooth – tx each side mouth separately
- If extracting upper don’t necessarily take lower