Interactionism Flashcards
What kind of approach do interactionists take?
Labelling =
ask how and why some people get labelled as deviant, and the effect this has on them.
What labelling theorists are there?
- Becker.
- Cicourel.
- Lemert.
- Young.
- Stanley Cohen.
- Braithewaite.
How do interactionists describe deviance?
Deviance isn’t the act itself, but a deviant is someone whom the label has been successfully applied.
How is crime a social construct?
It’s socially constructed by how society sees an act as deviant, different societies see different acts as deviant.
- e.g. walking around naked =
it’s fine to be naked in the shower, but deviant if you are naked in public, however, some places allow you to be naked on a beach and some places don’t.
How important are moral crusaders in labelling people?
Moral crusaders redefine whether an act is acceptable, making crime a social construct; leading to some people becoming ‘outsiders’ from labelling (marginalised).
Why are some social groups more likely to be labelled than others?
Some people are more likely to be labelled as deviant due to their social class, situation and interaction with social control agents (focus on face-to-face interactions).
What evidence supports Becker’s view on who gets labelled?
Pilliavin and Briar (1964) =
police were more likely to arrest a youth who had poor appearance and based their decision to arrest on gender, ethnicity, social class, the time and place.
What does Cicourel focus on?
1) . Police’s typification.
2) . CJS bias in sentencing.
3) . Crime is negotiable.
4) . Truth about official statistics (dark figure of crime).
What bias within justice is there, according to Cicourel?
- Police’s typification.
2. CJS bias in sentencing.
What is typification?
The way police label the typical delinquent based on stereotypes, leads to more arrests and charging of w/c people as they fit police’s typification, confirming the stereotype.
What bias within the CJS is there?
Probation officers =
stereotyped delinquents were from broken homes and assumed they would re-offend, so;
- They were more likely to be charged.
- They were more likely to receive custodial sentences to inhibit them re-offending.
Evaluate Cicourel’s view about typification?
Marxists =
argue that interactionists fail to locate the origins of these labels in the unequal structure of capitalist society.
What does Cicourel say about crime being negotiable?
w/c youths were more likely to be arrested and charged because;
1) They fit polices typification.
2) . m/c parents can negotiate how to ‘sorry’ they are on their behalf using neutralisation techniques.
What is the dark figure of crime?
The difference between the official statistics and the ‘real’ rate of crime –> we don’t know how much crime goes undetected, unreported, and unrecorded.
What does Cicourel argue that causes the dark figure of crime?
Bias causes official statistics to give an invalid picture of patterns of crime.
- So we can’t use them to show how much crime there actually is, only monitoring the actions of social control agents.
Which interactionists focus on the effects of labelling?
1) . Lemert (primary + secondary deviance).
2) . Young (primary + secondary deviance).
3) . Stanley Cohen (deviance amplification spiral).
4) . Braitherwaite (reintegrative + disintegrative shaming).
What does Lemert say primary deviance is?
A deviant act that hasn’t been publicly labelled - mostly go uncaught.
- Those that commit them don’t often see themselves as deviant.
What does Lemert say secondary deviance is?
Societies reactions to acts labelled as deviant.
- This can result in; stigmatising, excluding and shaming those labelled.
Evaluate Lemert’s theory on primary deviance?
He fails to explain why people commit primary deviance in the first place, before they are labelled.
What does Lemert say the effects of secondary deviance is?
- Master status =
others view them by their label, not their identity.
- Self-fulfilling prophecy =
they may accept the label, confirming the prophecy.
- Deviance career =
shared identity with other ‘outsiders’, may result in a deviant subculture.
How does Young apply primary and secondary deviance to Notting Hill hippies>
Primary deviance =
drugs were used as a sense of identity - a part of their lifestyle, they didn’t see it as deviant.
Secondary deviance =
police persecuted them as deviants (societies reaction), they started to view themselves as ‘outsiders’.
What effects of labelling did the Notting Hill hippies show?
- Deviant career =
they identified with each other as more close-knit.
- Self-fulfilling prophecy =
used more drugs, gaining more attention and ultimately fulfilling the prophecy as drugs became a central activity.
- Deviance amplification =
Police tried to control the situation, but made it worse, agents of social control aimed to produce law-abiding behaviour but produced the opposite.
Evaluate interactionists view on self-fulfilling prophecies?
Too deterministic =
they assume that once labelled, a self-fulfilling prophecy is inevitable. Although the individual is always free to choose to not deviate further.
How does Stanley Cohen describe a deviance amplification spiral?
Social control agents try to control deviance, which leads to more deviance, leading to a greater attempt to control, and so on.
