interactionalism and labelling theories Flashcards
basic ideas of labelling theory
most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only some people get caught and stigmatised for it
crime is a social construct
understanding to the reaction of deviance rather then the cause of the initial act
Becker: the social construction of crime
an act only becomes deviant when others perceive it as such and depends on societal reaction.
calls groups such as mass media and police who have the power and resources their definitions of deviance, moral entrepreneurs
evaluation of Becker
too deterministic and ignores that some groups or individuals are able to reject their label.
fails to explain how moral entrepreneurs get their power to label.
becker: selective law enforcement
police operate with pre existing conceptions and stereotypical categories of what causes trouble. influence the behaviour as to how they come across
effects of labelling
once a person has been labelled deviant they come to see themselves as being labelled bad. term ‘master status’ once the label has successfully been applied to a person other qualities become unimportant
Braithwaite’s idea on disintegrative
replacing the offender status with the master status of ‘criminal’ which shapes all future interactions and excludes the person socially
brainwaite’s idea of reintegrated shaming
disintegrative shaming can be replaced with reintegrated shaming which is the deviant act that is shamed and not the individual who commits it. helping the offender to realise that the bad acts have a negative consequences for others
restorative justice
meeting with the offender and victims which victims can talk about how it negatively affecting them and the offender has a chance to feel remorse and apologise for actions
Lemert primary deviance
deviance that hasn’t been publicly labelled. there are few consequences because its not publicly known
Lemert secondary deviance
an offender is discovered and publicly exposed the label is attached to them
evaluation of Lemert
the inuits of Canada
cicourel on social control and negotiated justice
police officers decisions to arrest are influenced by their stereotypes about offenders.
led them to concentrate on certain types resulting in law enforcement showing class bias
justice is not fixed but negotiable
methods link: cicourel
used participant and non participant observation. went on patrol with the police and sat in the courtroom
cicourel evaluation
Marxists would argue that he doesn’t consider where these stereotypes came from in the first place