Intentional Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Battery

A

Intentionally causing harmful or offensive contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Act

A

Volitional movement of the body (unconscious acts are not volitional).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intent

A

Acting for purpose of causing offensive or harmful contact, or knowing to a substantial certainty that a harmful or offensive contact will be produced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Transferred Intent

A

If Defendant acts intending to cause battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, or trespass to chattels, he will be liable even if particular contact to Plaintiff is unexpected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harmful/ offensive contact

A

Must involve contact with Plaintiff’s person or something closely associated with Plaintiff. Contact is harmful if it injures, disfigures, or impairs the body. Contact is offensive if it would offense a reasonable person’s sense of dignity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Causation

A

Defendant’s conduct must directly or indirectly bring about the injury. Setting in motion the force that causes the injury is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Damages

A

Actual damages are not required. Compensatory damages for pain and suffering, etc. and punitive damages (if Defendant acted maliciously) are recoverable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assault

A

Reasonable apprehension of harmful or offensive contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Apprehension

A

Plaintiff must be placed in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact (of Plaintiff, not someone else) and must be subjectively aware of the threat at the time thereof.

Threat of imminent harmful or offensive contact is required. Words may negate the threat (where threat is of future harm). However a conditional threat may be an assault where Defendant is not privileged to make a threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False imprisonment

A

Defendant intends to confine Plaintiff to a specific area, a confinement, and causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

Extreme and outrageous conduct by Defendant
Intent to cause severe emotional distress
Causation
Actual severe emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actual (express) consent

A

Affirmative defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Apparent Consent

A

What a reasonable person would infer from custom or from Plaintiff’s conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consent Implied by Law

A

If necessary to save a life or other important interest and Plaintiff is unconscious or unable to consider matter, immediate decision is necessary, there is no reason to believe Plaintiff wold withhold consent if able, and a reasonable person in Plaintiff’s position would consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dimensions of Consent

A

Scope of Consent, Capacity to Consent, Consent to Illegal Conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-defense

A

Right for civilians to act with reasonable force for sake defending one’s life or lives of others.

17
Q

Public Necessity

A

An actor destroys property for benefit of public at large. Use of private property by a public official for a public reason.The potential harm to society necessitates the destruction or use of private property for greater good.

18
Q

Private Necessity

A

The use of another’s property for private purposes. It can prevent a property owner from using force against an individual in a situation where the privilege of necessity would apply. The individual must compensate the owner for any damage caused (incomplete privilege).

19
Q

Eggshell Skull

A

Once you have committed a tort against person, you are responsible for full injuries of those person

20
Q

Garret v. Dailey

A

Defendant pulled chair out from under plaintiff

If defendant knew plaintiff was about to sit down, would be intent

21
Q

In Re White

A

White bought gun to intimidate, accidentally shot

Intent follows the bullet

22
Q

Colman v. Notre Dame

A

Institutionalized person injures blind worker

Mental deficiency is not defense to battery

23
Q

Cohen v. Smith

A

Woman giving birth requests male hospital staff not to see or touch her but defendant doctor does

Physical harm not required for battery

24
Q

Leichman v. WLW

A

Blowing smoke in someones face is offensive

25
Raess v. Doescher
Defendant approached with clenched fists, screaming | No physical contact necessary as long as plaintiff reasonably apprehensive contact would occur
26
Johnson v. Thigpen
Woman subject to offensive touching and verbal harassment at work IIED requires unwelcome physical contact and verbal abuse together Note most state courts do not require physical touching
27
O’Brien v. Cunard Steamship
Woman who got vaccinated on boat, raised arm and did not verbally object Implied (apparent) consent - What a reasonable person would infer from custom or from Plaintiff’s conduct
28
Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals
Plaintiff injured from hit by other player away from play Scope of Consent - Was the activity outside the bounds of what had been consented to?
29
Katko v. Briney
Spring gun loaded in area, plaintiff breaks in and shot Cannot use discriminate, deadly force to protect property Life more valuable than property
30
Surroco v. Geary
Mayor orders house torn down to prevent further fire Making decision for public, not himself, public policy Sovereign Immunity - Provides government with immunity from civil or criminal suits
31
Rossi v. Del Duca
Plaintiff goes on land of defendant to avoid dog, defendant liable under dog bite statute One is privileged to enter land of another if it is or reasonable appears to be necessary to prevent harm to actor or property
32
Vincent v. Lake Erie Transport
Ship docked in storm, reties ropes, ship damages dock | Dock deserves to be compensated as defendant protected their more valuable property to expense of plaintiff’s property