Intentional Torts Flashcards
What are the consequentialist aims of tort law?
1) incentivize optimal level of care with CBA 2) society focused, forward looking 3) ex ante
Tort law is mostly about — not —
Compensation not punishment
What are the four basic prima facie elements of a torts
Duty, breach, causation, damages
Tort law is the law that governs —
Private wrongs when no agreements (K)
Tort law is trying to avoid —-
Too much interference in our private relationships
What are the aims of a corrective Justice view of tort law
1) Rectifying moral wrongs between parties by making wrongdoer compensate the wronged 2) Focused on parties at hand, backwards looking 3) ex post 4) signaling function
Consequentialism and corrective Justice are not — but sometimes —
Mutually exclusive, lead to different outcomes
What are the basic elements of an intentional tort
Intentional action (duty, breach), causation, damages
What are consequentialist theories behind intentional torts
Deter harmful conduct by making it costly especially since optimal level of it is zero, greater cost to P than D
What is the corrective Justice theory behind intentional torts
D did moral wrong so must make P whole by compensating
Intent can be satisfied with
Purpose OR substantial certainty
Battery is ..
1) an act 2) intending (purpose or certainty) to cause contact or apprehension 3) and causing harmful or offensive physical contact with a person or third person 4) that is unjustified and unconsensual
Why does battery tort include third person
Transferred intent
Intending the — but no intending the — is not battery
action, action to cause harmful or offensive contact
Is throwing a ball when playing catch and hitting someone’s face battery.
NO
Transferred intent applies to
All torts
— damages apply to all torts
Eggshell skull
Substantial certainty applies to —-
All torts
Intent is inferred from —- not —
Actions not state of mind
Eggshell skull rule holds that D is liable for —
All damages resulting from intended harmful contact whether foreseeable or not
How did the contest matter for intent in Vosburg
Playground kick vs classroom
Substantial certainty shows you can commit a battery without
Physical touch
Garage: even if no purpose if he had —- that P —, he would be liable
known with substantial certainty, would attempt to sit down on the chair after he kicked it
Single intent shows that liability stems from — not a —
Intent to make harmful contact, guilty mind
What is policy behind single intent
Tort law meant to be about compensation
Single intent means that ..
Intended act + intended contact + contact that is harmful or offensive satisfies tort