Intentional Torts Flashcards

1
Q

What are the consequentialist aims of tort law?

A

1) incentivize optimal level of care with CBA 2) society focused, forward looking 3) ex ante

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tort law is mostly about — not —

A

Compensation not punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the four basic prima facie elements of a torts

A

Duty, breach, causation, damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tort law is the law that governs —

A

Private wrongs when no agreements (K)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tort law is trying to avoid —-

A

Too much interference in our private relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the aims of a corrective Justice view of tort law

A

1) Rectifying moral wrongs between parties by making wrongdoer compensate the wronged 2) Focused on parties at hand, backwards looking 3) ex post 4) signaling function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consequentialism and corrective Justice are not — but sometimes —

A

Mutually exclusive, lead to different outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the basic elements of an intentional tort

A

Intentional action (duty, breach), causation, damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are consequentialist theories behind intentional torts

A

Deter harmful conduct by making it costly especially since optimal level of it is zero, greater cost to P than D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the corrective Justice theory behind intentional torts

A

D did moral wrong so must make P whole by compensating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intent can be satisfied with

A

Purpose OR substantial certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Battery is ..

A

1) an act 2) intending (purpose or certainty) to cause contact or apprehension 3) and causing harmful or offensive physical contact with a person or third person 4) that is unjustified and unconsensual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why does battery tort include third person

A

Transferred intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intending the — but no intending the — is not battery

A

action, action to cause harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is throwing a ball when playing catch and hitting someone’s face battery.

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Transferred intent applies to

A

All torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

— damages apply to all torts

A

Eggshell skull

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Substantial certainty applies to —-

A

All torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intent is inferred from —- not —

A

Actions not state of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Eggshell skull rule holds that D is liable for —

A

All damages resulting from intended harmful contact whether foreseeable or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did the contest matter for intent in Vosburg

A

Playground kick vs classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Substantial certainty shows you can commit a battery without

A

Physical touch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Garage: even if no purpose if he had —- that P —, he would be liable

A

known with substantial certainty, would attempt to sit down on the chair after he kicked it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Single intent shows that liability stems from — not a —

A

Intent to make harmful contact, guilty mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is policy behind single intent

A

Tort law meant to be about compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Single intent means that ..

A

Intended act + intended contact + contact that is harmful or offensive satisfies tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What was the damages wrinkle in Wagner case

A

She didn’t get compensate from single intent because state in custody of person and had immunity from battery damages

28
Q

What are the pros to an insanity defense for battery

A

Not clear that you are deterring anything, may lead to over deterrence from their guardians, liability should follow fault and here there is one

29
Q

What is a con to the insanity defense for battery

A

Sometimes no one at fault but should damages should go with person less at fault

30
Q

What is offensive battery

A

Contact causing emotional or dignitary harm

31
Q

Fisher held that can be battery even without

A

assault or physical contact with the body

32
Q

There can be battery without physical contact to the body as long as there is ..

A

Contact with something attached to the body and practically identified

33
Q

What are examples of items that contact with could constitute battery

A

Book, clothing, cane, plate

34
Q

For offensive battery, the offense

A

May but doesn’t have to be related to the contact

35
Q

What is policy behind offensive battery

A

Sphere of body extends beyond body but need to draw the line somewhere

36
Q

Assault definition

A

Emotional harm by causing reasonable apprehension of physical harm

37
Q

Elements of assault

A

Act intending and caused the P or third party to have the apprehension of immediate non consensual contact that if carried through would constitute battery

38
Q

For assault — is the harm

A

Apprehension itself

39
Q

A mere threat is ..

A

Not assault

40
Q

When apprehension itself is the harm, damages may ..

A

Be only nominal

41
Q

With assault and battery, you are liable for the ..

A

One you caused, not necessarily the one you intended

42
Q

What is the policy behind assault

A

Don’t want people always feeling like they are about to be battered even if it doesn’t happen

43
Q

If you caused both assault and battery you are

A

Liable for both

44
Q

Apprehension is not the same thing as ..

A

Fear

45
Q

For apprehension, you don’t have to think that the contact ..

A

Will be effective just that it will happen (gym bro vs small guy)

46
Q

A sneak attack may be — but not —

A

Battery, assault

47
Q

A third party put in apprehension by D and P’s sick joke only recovers if

A

She thinks she herself is in danger not P or D

48
Q

Words alone are — need —

A

Not assault, immediacy and apparent ability to act

49
Q

Policy behind words alone not assault

A

Free speech, not interfering too much in private lives

50
Q

A conditional threat is not assault unless …

A

Unlawful condition, capacity for physical violence and immediate

51
Q

Is “I would stab you if police weren’t around assault

A

No

52
Q

Is “I will stab you if you don’t give the money while pointing to knife assault

A

Likely yes

53
Q

First element of false imprisonment

A

He acts intending to confine the other or a third person in boundaries fixed by the actor

54
Q

Second element of false imprisonment

A

His act directly or indirectly results in such a confinement of the other

55
Q

Third element of false imprisonment

A

Other is conscious of the confinement OR harmed by it

56
Q

Full elements of false imprisonment

A

Actor acts intending to confine the other or a third person in boundaries fixed by the actor that directly or indirectly results in such a confinement of the other and the other is conscious of the confinement or harmed by it

57
Q

Confinement fixed by the actor must be

A

Complete

58
Q

False imprisonment does not require ..

A

Physical force

59
Q

Confinement is complete unless…

A

Reasonable means of escape AND other knows of it

60
Q

If a route of escape… it is not reasonable

A

Risks possible harm to your person, property or dignity

61
Q

If only escape route involves jumping in a pile of manure that won’t injur you is. That reasonable

A

No, dignitary harm

62
Q

M serves B with fake court order he thinks is real saying he can’t leave NYC False imprisonment?

A

Yes, can escape reasonably but doesn’t know, large area doesn’t matter

63
Q

Confinement is not limited by ..

A

Area size

64
Q

M puts N on no fly list intentionally and knows incorrect. If she tries to fly and stopped is it false imprisonment

A

Yes, harmed by it even if didn’t know at time she was confined

65
Q

M puts N on no fly list intentionally and knows incorrect. If she doesn’t try to fly and is removed before knowing is it false imprisonment

A

No , must be conscious of or harmed WHILE confinement happening

66
Q

False imprisonment requires a … harm

A

Emotional/dignitary