CBA and Customs Flashcards
Stone held that only .. and
Only unprecedented occurrence unforeseeable, some balls outside in 30 yes meant either build higher fence or stop playing cricket
Bolton held that …
Negligence is where risk is foreseeable but also substantial (in likelihood and severity)
Why Bolton not real CBA
Doesn’t take into account precaution costs
US vs Caroll Towing held that ..
RP doesn’t prevent all accidents just one’s where B < PL
Hand formula has no explicit ..
Emergency exception
BPL, B may include..
Cost of safety device, stopping activity, or wages for workers who make activity safer
BPL, P may include ..
Activity, time, place, weather conditions, injuries before
BPL, L may include.l
Type of damage possible and injuries associated
Pros of CBA
Judicial balancing anyways so creates consistency, intuitive so decent proxy, don’t want to deter beneficial activity
Cons of CBA BPL
Overlooks incommensurability, sometimes normatively incorrect (Trolley problem), overlooks info costs
Rd Approach to CBA
Foreseeable likelihood will result in harm, foreseeable severity, burden of precautions to reduce or eliminate harm
Difference between BPL and Rd Approach
Rd addresses info costs, space for other considerations, factors rather than equation, recognizes jury normally not doing BPL
Rd emergency exception
If unexpected emergency requiring rapid response, should be taken into account to determine if reasonable conduct
When arguing BPL, find — for your client
Low B
Cooley held that must ..
Account for costs to others, not just P
Cooley Reasoning
Danger to P remote compared to risk of electrocution on street, installing device would’ve made street risk higher
Andrews is about ..
Heightened duty of common carrier