Intelligence Project Flashcards

1
Q

Threshold Hypothesis

A

Specific to creativity, a certain level of intelligence is necessary but not sufficient for creativity, no correlation at high levels. Evidence is mixed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perfect pitch

A

Thought to be a 1 in 10,000 occurrence, it is more common in people speaking tonal languages and was taught to every one of the children in a 1.5 year study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Growth mindset

A

Belief that intelligence can be changed through effort. Evidence that this can be changed is weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Grit

A

Ability to persevere in the face of challenges. Evidence that this can be changed is weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Preterm births

A

Lead to lower scores on cognitive tests, math tests, reading tests, behavior assessments, motor control, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Some examples of human progress

A

Marathon record dropped by 30%, Olympic dives recommended banned now competed by 10 year olds, Steve Faloon’s memory feats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Constrained vs unconstrained skills

A

Constrained are finite - letters of the alphabet, basic letter-sound correspondence. Unconstrained is stuff like knowledge. Unconstrained more correlated with outside variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Flynn Effect

A

The gradual but substantial and long-sustained increase in IQ scores over time across the world. Some evidence of reversal in northern Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

g-loading

A

How much a particular skill is correlated with the hypothetical general intelligence g

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deliberate practice

A

Explains from 0% to 26% of variability in Macnamara et al meta-analysis, higher values for more predictable domains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Polygenic index vs college completion

A

Similar explanatory power to family income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

GWAS

A

Genome-wide association study, used to create a polygenic index

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Polygenic index percent of outcomes explained

A

Typically 10-15%, a bit more than income-higher education, a bit less than height-weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rough heritability of intelligence as measured by IQ (Ritchie)

A

50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Counterfactual: why genetic causal claims can be confusing

A

If a society refused to send redheads to school, genes for red hair would seem to be associated with educational outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positive manifold

A

Broad trend that different measures of cognitive ability tend to be highly correlated, seen as evidence of underlying g

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fluid vs crystallized intelligence

A

Fluid more connected to reasoning and working memory, more correlated with intelligence, doesn’t change much. Crystallized more connected to knowledge and long-term memory, grows over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Matthew Effect

A

Those who start with an advantage accumulate more advantage over time

19
Q

Flynn Effect differential

A

The gains are largely due to increases at the bottom of the spectrum

20
Q

Genetic effects on differences measured at age 10 months

A

None

21
Q

Heritability of executive function

A

Nearly 100%

22
Q

Outcome of chess instruction

A

Kids get better at chess, null on academic and non-cognitive outcomes

23
Q

Percent of variance in learning attributable to teachers/schools (Detterman)

A

10%

24
Q

Average effect size in education RCTs, Dietrichson

A

0.06

25
Q

Summary of pre-k research (DeBoer)

A

Mixed bag, more recent and randomized studies show much smaller (sometimes negative) effects

26
Q

Throughout childhood, genetic influences on cognitive ability

A

Increase

27
Q

Male/female differences in polygenic predictions of educational attainment historically

A

Increased access to education increased genetic inequality

28
Q

Examples of interventions that narrow genetic inequality

A

Association between genetics and obesity reduced, association between genetics and alcoholism eliminate, association between genetics and math courses taken reduced

29
Q

Raven’s matrices and working memory

A

When under time pressure, working memory and fluid reasoning are the same. They diverge a bit without time pressure

30
Q

Fluid intelligence vs crystallized intelligence

A

Fluid is more correlated with g and seems to be mostly working memory + processing speed. Crystallized is more about long-term memory.

31
Q

Executive function interventions

A

Rarely show results in follow-up assessment

32
Q

Executive function is maybe just (Loffler)

A

Processing speed

33
Q

Polygenic score/learning rate effect (Youn et al, Harden)

A

Practice seems to narrow genetic effects

34
Q

Cognitive components of athletics

A

Pattern recognition in volleyball/baseball accounts for much of skill differences, baseball players can’t hit a softball pitch

35
Q

Ackerman’s study

A

Air traffic control simulation, larger ability correlations in the arrivals condition, individual differences increase with practice in that condition (?)

36
Q

Modern evidence that practice widens gaps

A

Zerr et al, Lithuanian words study. Lots of potential confounders but still really interesting.

37
Q

Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics (Turkheimer)

A

All behavioral traits are heritable, effect of genes is larger than the effect of family, most variation is stuff besides genes and families

38
Q

Flynn Effect fluid vs crystallized

A

No effect on processing speed - seems like it’s more about crystallized knowledge

39
Q

Positive manifold or negative manifold?

A

The positive manifold increases with lower IQ, and increases as children age (Gusev)

40
Q

g-loading is highest on

A

Culturally loaded subtests (Kan et al 2013)

41
Q

SES-IQ association

A

None at 10 months, gradually grows stronger over time (Gusev)

42
Q

Mutualist model of intelligence

A

Data suggests a bidirectional feedback loop between fluid and crystallized intelligence, for instance matrix reasoning and vocabulary

43
Q

Most g-loaded IQ subtests

A

Most culturally loaded, i.e. vocabulary, knowledge

44
Q

A million little nudges evidence

A

Things like preschool fade, but adoption matters a ton. No neurological basis for intelligence. Cultural loadings for g. EEA violation for twin studies.