Integration theories Flashcards

1
Q

neofunctionalist drivers of integration (3)

A

creation of functional international agencies&raquo_space; these actors push further integration&raquo_space; these actors push for international decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

LI drivers of integration (2)

A
  • state preferences reflect economic interest driving them closer together
  • states cooperate where coordination may increase domestic control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe multilevel governance in terms of theory in one word

A

model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

multi-level governance drivers of integration (2)

A

less about explaning integration but suggests that the collaboration between different levels of actors is key
- also the regional actors implement the policies so are key to driving integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

social constructivism, drivers of integration (1)

A

integration driven by shared ideology and culture of Europeans, built on the shared identity and historical construction of EU as opposed to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Europeanisation (of actor identities) drivers of integration (1)

A

ideational entrepreneurs persuade people to adopt european identity which drives closer union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Feminist theory, drivers of integration

A

more focussed on the hierarchical nature of integration theories placing states as primary actors in a gendered way less concerned with the process of integrationa and more how it is gendered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

main scholars of neofunctionalism? (2)

A

Haas (1958)The uniting of Europe

Lindberg (1963) The political dynamics of european economic integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

main scholars of LI? (1)

A

Moravcsik (1993) preferences and power in the european community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

main scholars of Multi-level governance? (2)

A

Marks et al (1996) European integration fromt he 1980s: state-centirc v. multi-level governance
Marks + Bache and Flinders 2004 multi-level governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

main scholars of Social constructivism in EU integration theories? (2)

A

Christiansen 1999 The social construction of europe

Risse 2010 a comunity of europeans?transnational identities and public spheres

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

main scholars of europeanisation of actor identities? (2)

A

Borzel ?

Risse 2009 we the euroepean peoples? identity, public sphere and the european democracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

main scholars of feminist theory of integration

A

Locher and Prugl 2009 in european integration theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define integration theory and which scholar gave this definition?

A

a broad way of understanding the socia and political processes of integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the 2 (+1) main approaches to integration theory

A

(federalism)
LI
Neofunctionalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define federalism

A

the incremental movement of states into a federal system through functional units of the states e.g. supranational institutitons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

define supranational in terms of institutions

A

having power beyond the state or territorial powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

aroudn what time did Haas and Lindbergs conception of integration have most relvance

A

late 50s to mid 60s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

when was the European Coal and Steel Coalition formed?

A

1952

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what was neofunctionalism a reaction to?

A

the formation of the ECSC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what does EEC stand for

A

euroepean economic community

22
Q

what is Euratom? and when was it created?

A

the European atomic energy community, 1958

23
Q

what is the main claim of neofunctionalism?

A

the concept of spillover, drives integration

24
Q

how do neofuntionalists view integration (process/not)

A

process, the process evolve over time as integration becomes closer

25
Q

do neofunctionalist view states as the only actor?

A

no, has a pluralist perspective of the actors involved

26
Q

what assumption did Haas and Lindberg make about the people of the EU?

A

permissive concensus

27
Q

what is the underlying economic assumption of neofuntionalism?

A

continued and sustained economic growth due to pursuit of profit

28
Q

give 3 points on spillover

A
  • specific integration leads to positivity to integration and thus more
  • lindberg suggests elites become interconnected (engregage)
  • political spillover due to socialisation
  • actors gain through compromise or concete
  • domestic elites help to achieve european goals (cultivated spillover)
29
Q

give 3 criticisms of neofunctional accounts of integration

A
  • only applies to EU when it was designed as general thoery
  • spillover reliant on economic determinism
  • suggests inevitability of spillover
  • ignores strutural pressures - assumes constant economic growth among members, yet spillover is a fair weather process
  • lack of attention to domestic politics
30
Q

who are the most important actors in Liberal intergovernmentalism?

A

states

31
Q

how are states viewed from a Liberal intergovernmentalist perspective?

A
  • rational

- take part in intergovenrmental negotiations

32
Q

how do national pressures play out in Liberal intergovernmentalism?

A

issue specific preferences differ on each issue

33
Q

what is the substantive bargaining theory?

A

where states must cooperate to reach mutual benefit, and cooperation depends on bargaining power of the states

34
Q

what is asymmetrical interdependence in Liberal intergovernmentalism?

A

a way in which states can coerce concession from other states with the threat of non-cooperation

35
Q

under Liberal intergovernmentalism, why do states agree to delgate authority to institutions?

A

as a neccesity to the agreements made with other states

36
Q

what is the main role of institutions for integration

A

the economic side of things, most things which arent related to the economy arent enforced by institutions and it is up to states to comply

37
Q

give 3 criticisms of Liberal intergovernmentalism

A
  • selectively ignores the influence of institutions and chooses to focus on the tiny amounts where states have most control e.g. treaties
  • focus on intended consequences, ignores accidental consequences which skews integration
  • empirical examples often dont hold up
38
Q

what does the Multi-level Governance model provide an opposition to?

A

the state-centric model

39
Q

name 3 types of actors who have agency in the Multi-level Governance model

A

subnational actors
supranational actors
interest groups

40
Q

most decisions are ____ ___ and therefore involve uneven wins and losses

A

zero sum

41
Q

what state-centric assumption about subnational actors is most contested byMulti-level Governance

A

monopoly of power channels

the nested nature of political arenas, actors can inhabit many

42
Q

how have subnational and supranational actors increased power in brussels

A

moved into the brussels arena and got further up the list of agenda setting

43
Q

What committee established some institutional structures for regional actors in the EU

A

the committee of regions 1993

44
Q

what is the second main institution which assists regional actors in gaining power in the EU

A

the commission

45
Q

what did the committee of regions structure?

A

the involvement of subnational actors in design and implementation of economic development

46
Q

in which stage is Multi-level Governance most obvious?

A

implementation stage

47
Q

what is comitology

A

committees for the implementation of EU laws which represent every nation

48
Q

why does comitology lead to greater Multi-level Governance

A

technical issues require specific expertise which is most often found at subnational levels, who then inform more multi-level discourses and further connections with regional actors

49
Q

what are package meetings?

A

voluntary meetings which involve regional and local levels in implementation of policies which includes these actors in the EU arena

50
Q

what does Multi-level Governance suggest is happening to state sovereignty

A

states are not losing sovereignty but losing their monopoly on power, and the power is now spread more thinly from national governments to societal interest groups

51
Q

according to Multi-level Governance why do states shift decision making to the EU?

A

in order to shift responsibility away from the national executive or for the political benefits of effieciency