Integrated Evidence Based Approach to Specific Cardiac Disorders Flashcards
What is the Framingham criteria
used in HF diagnosis with reduced EF
only modest sensitivity and specificity
Compared to 3 or more symptoms of S3, tachycardia, elevated JVP, low pulse pressure, rales, ajr sign - 90%
when is HF most likely to be preserved
female, older, increased BMI
PP is determined by
stroke volume
vascular stiffness
(can be used to assess Cardiac output)
PP equation
(systolic -diastolic) / systolic
correlates well with cardiac index, stroke volume index, inverse systemic vascular resistance
if PP is lower than 25%, cardiac index is
less than 2.2 L/min/m2 in 91% of patients
if PP is greater than 25% , cardiac index is
greater than 2.2 L/min/m2 in 83% of patients
using oxygen as indicator, how to assess cardiac output?
a time from breath to hold to nadir of finger oximetry of greater than 34 seconds has been associated with Cardiac output < 4 L/min
TRUE or FALSE - Heart rate is also a powerful indicator of prognosis in HF
True , greater than 70 to 75 bpm is an independent predictor of mortality
Explain dysautonomia in HF
an attenuated HR increase with immediate standing (= 3 bpm); associated with death and Hospitalization;
simplest finding to elicit pleural effusion (LR 8.7)
Dullness to percussion
Absence of such makes pleural effusion less likely (LR 0.21)
Absence of reduced vocal fremitus
Signs suggesting severe mitral stenosis
1 long or holodiastolic murmur - indicating a persistent LA -LV gradient
2 short A2 OS interval -consistent with higher LA pressures
3 a loud P2 (or single S2) and or RV lift - suggestive of pulmonary hpn
4 elevated JVP with CV waves , hepatomegaly and lower ext edema - signs of right HF
xintensity of diastolic murmur
x presystolic accentuation
Findings that suggest chronic severe MR:
1 enlarged, displaced, but dynamic LV apex beat
2 apical systolic thrill (grade 4 or greater)
3 mid-diastolic filling complex comprising of S3 and a short, low-pitched murmur - accelerated and enhanced diastolic mitral inflow
4 wide but physiologic splitting of S2 caused by early aortic valve closure
5 loud P2 or RV lift
Findings with MVP
combination of non-ejection click and mid to late systolic murmur predicts MVP best (LR 2.43)
The following findings help gauge the severity of aortic stenosis
1 slowly rising carotid upstroke (pulsus tardus)
2 reduced carotid stroke amplitude (pulsus parvus)
3 reduced intensity of A2 and mid-to late peaking of the systolic murmur
x intensity of murmur
May independently predict outcome for severe aortic stenosis
reduced carotid upstroke amplitude
to differentiate with aortic sclerosis (older pxs with hypertension)
TTE
in aortic sclerosis - no valve dysfunction, carotid upstroke normal, A2 preserved, no LV hypertrophy
Differential diagnosis of systolic murmur related to LVOT obstruction
1 valvular aortic stenosis
2 hocm
3 DMSS
4 SVAS
Presence of ejection sound in systolic murmur
valvular cause
How can HOCM be distinguished with AS
Response of murmur to Valsalva and standing or squatting
Will usualy have a diastolic murmur indicative of AR but not an ejection sound
Discrete membranous subaortic stenosis
Right arm BP is more than 10 mmHg greater than the left arm BP
Supravalvular Aortic stenosis