Instrumental conditioning Flashcards
Thorndike
If in the presence of a stimulus a response is followed by a satisfying state of affairs, the connection between the stimulus and the response will be strengthened. If the response if followed by an annoying state of affairs, the connection between the stimulus and response will be weakened
Goal directed actions
Stimulus –> response –> outcome decisions
Habitual actions
stimulus –> response associations
Outcome devaluation
can demonstrate that SR and SOR both contribute to instrumental conditioning
Adams and Dickinson 1981
Devaluation of sucrose (lever 1) leads to pressing of lever 2 (pellets) after limited training (SOR learning) but after extended training there is no devaluation effect and both levers are pressed evenly
Clinical relevance of outcome devaluation
OCD – patients show an insensitivity to outcome devaluation (Gillan et al., 2011)
Stress results in less sensitivity to outcome devaluation (Schwabe & Wolf, 2011)
Actions learnt under the influence of alcohol are less sensitive to outcome devaluation (Hogarth et al., 2012, Biological Psychology)
Alcohol seeking behaviour becomes insensitive to devaluation if over-trainined (Corbitt et al., Biological Psychiatry, 2012)
Likely candidate for instrumental conditioning?
Striatum (caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens). It receives information from a variety of cortical and subcortical areas and then sends information back to the motor cortex.
Yin et al 2005
Lesions of the dorsomedial striatum in rats impairs sensitivity to outcome devaluation (i.e. lesioned rats behave in a habitual manner).
Basolateral Amygdala
The Basolateral Amygdala is necessary
for the outcome representation. Balleine B W et al. 2003. Lesioned rats had far fewer actions at an extinction test for both devalued and valued stimuli
Killcross & Coutureau 2003
Infralimbin vs Prelimbic
Damage to these two areas provides a double dissociation. When given limited training prelimbic FC lesions impair outcome devaluation, but infralimbic FC lesions are without effect. However, when given extended training infralimbic FC lesions fail to show a reduction in sensitivity to outcome devaluation; they remain goal-directed when sham rats display habitual behavior. Prelimbic FC lesions continue to show habitual responding when overtrained.
The double dissociation between prelimbic and infralimbic regions of the FC the outcome devaluation task demonstrates that S-R and S-O-R learning occurs independently of one another.
Prelimbic
Damage after acquisition of the behaviour does not impair outcome devaluation suggesting that the prelimbic region is important for encoding associations, but its not where the memory is stored (Ostlund & Balleine, 2005). Prelimbic necessary for acquiring SOR association but not necessary once this behaviour is acquired
Infralimbic
Inactivation after overtraining results in habitual behaviour becoming goal-directed again. Therefore, the infralimbic region is not important for learning S-R associations, but for suppressing the influence of S-O-R associations on behaviour (Coutureau & Killcross, 2003). The fact that infralimbic FC lesions stops rats from displaying habitual responding suggests that it may be necessary acquiring S-R associations. This is not the case. If the infralimbic region is inactivated once habitual responding has been acquired, the rats return to showing goal-directed behavior. The infralimbic region is not necessary for acquiring S-R learning, but is necessary for suppressing the influence of S-O-R associations on behavior.
See slides for diagram
Olds 1958
Electrical stimulation to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) leads to the release of a neurotransmitter called dopamine. In rats, electrical stimulation to the VTA appears to be rewarding. Rats will show a preference for spatial locations in which the stimulation occurred, and moreover, they learn to press a lever for stimulation.
Mobbs et al 2003
Humour, a pleasurable emotion, activates the nucleus accumbens, an area that receives dopaminergic input from VTA leads to strong evidence that dopamine is the brain’s pleasure chemical.
Anhedonia hypothesis
Pimozide treated rats stop responding for food reward. Wise 1982 - the food stopped tasting good, lost its pleasure. But maybe not. Parkinson’s patients rate foods as being as pleasant as do healthy subject (Travers et al. 1993)