Institutional aggression Flashcards
0
Q
Institutional aggression
A
- Behaviour that exists within/defines certain institution or group ie a school or a prison.
- Also other forms of collective violence between social groups based on racial, national or religious characteristics of members of one group, infamous examples include the Nazi movement and lynching mobs
1
Q
Zimbardo: situational factors
A
- Agg is product of an institution. SF; overcrowding, ^frustration levels, peer pressure and lack of EC can all have an effect.
- In absence of EC people more likely to deviate from normal rules of societal conduct.
- SF also include use of dehumanising labels ie “animals” where target groups seen as below moral consideration.
- FM DI occurs where individual ID removed. Culmination of these factors influence an individual to act in an evil way.
2
Q
Zimbardo: Abu Ghraib
A
- Where American soldiers abused and humiliated prisoners; Z argue range of SF;time of day, lack of EC: punishment/authority = normally moral guards abusive and aggressive.
- Guards displayed extreme agg/sexual humiliation, becoming lost in their role and the situation.
- Power of environment overtook individual responsibility and caused them to display more aggression.
3
Q
Bandura: supporting research (electric)
A
- Student participants, C1 ‘overheard’ other students referred to as “animals”, in C2 they were described as “nice”.
- Pps later asked to deliver electric shocks, significantly more shocks delivered to the students described as animals.
- TF labels impacted on the students decision to become more aggressive in their delivery of shocks
- Thus dehumanisation results in aggression.
4
Q
Ecological validity: Rwanda (Hutu kill Tutsi)
A
- Such R has high IV, although its EV can be questioned because of its artificiality.
- Finding applied to real life atrocities of dehumanisation.
- Exemplified by Rwandan massacre of the Tutsi by the Hutu people.
- Broadcasts by popular Hutu radio station instrumental in inciting agg against the Tutsi group.
- Refered to as “Inyenzi” (cockroaches).
- Approx 800,000 Tutsi people died in genocide. dehumanisation in a situation ^ the levels of aggressive behaviour.
5
Q
Environmental determinism: diminished responsibility
A
- // limitation of situational explanation is it is deterministic.
- Z argued that people influenced by powerful systems lose some of their free will = ‘diminished responsibility’ for actions.
- Actions become a product of their environment; moral implications regarding guards’ personal responsibility for their own behaviour. -
- Not all guards exposed to the same situation, took part in the acts
- TF ID plays a part and agg may be result of individual free will whether or not to act aggressively.
6
Q
Alternative biological: testosterone
A
- Disregards effects of NT/hormones; shown to play sig role in Agg. -TF an alternative exp for IAgg = biological paradigm.
- Sex hormone, T believed to influence agg due to its effect on areas of the brain controlling aggression.
- Reasonable to argue that the SExp not achieve Holism as BF have been shown as significant, they should be considered when explaining institutional aggression.
7
Q
Irwin and Cressey: importation model
A
- Irwin and Cressey’s Importation model for IAgg, focused on prison
- Believed that Iagg occurs bc of personal and psychological characteristics of prisoners within institutions.
- Individual’s social history influence how they adapt to prison env.
- These characteristics more likely for some inmates to act violently.
- I+C argue that prisoners normative systems not institution = in Agg
8
Q
Harer and Steffensmeiser: black inmates
A
- Harer and Staffenmeister collected data from 58 American prisons -Found; black inmates had significantly ^ rates of inter-personal V.
- TF suggesting those from most deprived backgrounds more likely to import outside behaviour into the prison.
- Hence Iagg imported from established cultural norms
9
Q
SSR: stigma, correlation, B2E and Banyard
A
- // such R leads to undue prejudice against certain social grp
- N-W prisoners vulnerable to a stigma of agg particularly in comparison to white prisoners. Even more dangerous when we consider that most supp R for IM based on correlatory F not CaE
- TF NCN but poor educational opportunities/barriers 2 employment perpetuating circumstances = violent norms for these groups.
- NOT ethnicity/social standing of people that makes them more aggressive so care must be taken to avoid unethical abuse of stats
- Banyard: dominoes is played quietly by white M, but white M observing a group of Caribbean M playing the same game labelled it as agg/threatening bc they lack understating of what constitutes agg in these societies - HL ethnocentrism
10
Q
Delisi: Contradictory (gang involvement)
A
- Studied 800 inmates, gang involvement before prison.
- Assumed based on IM that GB would be shown in prison due to importation of previous cultural values.
- Found no evidence that GM had any bearing on levels of violence.
- must be other factors outside of importation of agg.
11
Q
Systemic gender bias.
A
- Systemic GB relates to samples, generalisations made, RWA of F.
- F not only have different biological make up to M but CF that influence their agg are qualitatively different as well.
- Role of F in IAgg understudied and made irrelevant by the biased sampling methods.