Inspection

Question 1

Can you describe the different types of inspections a Building Surveyor might be required to undertake and the key differences between them?

Answer 1

Answer: A Building Surveyor may undertake various types of inspections, including condition surveys, pre-acquisition surveys, dilapidation surveys, and specific defect inspections. Condition surveys assess the current state of a property and identify any required maintenance. Pre-acquisition surveys evaluate a property’s condition before purchase to inform buyers of any potential issues. Dilapidation surveys document the condition of a property before and after a lease term to determine tenant liabilities. Specific defect inspections focus on diagnosing particular problems, such as structural issues or moisture ingress.

Question 2

How do you determine which type of inspection is most appropriate for a specific project or client requirement?

Answer 2

Answer: The type of inspection is determined by the client’s needs and the property’s context. For instance, a pre-acquisition survey is suitable for a client considering buying a property, while a condition survey is appropriate for a property owner planning maintenance work. Understanding the purpose of the inspection, the property’s usage, and any specific concerns the client has will guide the choice of inspection type.

Question 3

Can you give an example of a specific inspection you’ve conducted and explain how you prepared for it?

Answer 3

Answer: I recently conducted a pre-acquisition survey for a commercial property. Preparation involved a desktop study to gather information on the property’s history, previous reports, and any planning or building control issues. I reviewed maps and aerial images to understand the site context and identified any potential risks, such as flood zones or nearby hazardous facilities. This preparation allowed me to focus my on-site inspection on areas likely to present issues, ensuring a thorough and efficient survey.

Question 4

Why is conducting a desktop study important before undertaking an on-site inspection, and what information do you typically look for?

Answer 4

Answer: A desktop study is crucial as it helps identify potential risks and gather background information that can guide the on-site inspection. I typically look for property history, previous inspection reports, planning permissions, building control records, environmental data, and maps. This information helps me anticipate issues, plan the inspection effectively, and ensure I have the necessary equipment and expertise on hand.

Question 5

Can you explain how a thorough desktop study might influence your approach to an on-site inspection?

Answer 5

Answer: A thorough desktop study allows me to tailor my on-site inspection to focus on identified areas of concern. For example, if the study reveals previous subsidence issues, I will pay particular attention to the foundation and structural elements. It also helps in planning the inspection route, prioritizing critical areas, and ensuring that I address all relevant factors comprehensively.

Question 6

What potential risks might you identify during a desktop study, and how would these impact your inspection?

Answer 6

Answer: Potential risks identified during a desktop study might include structural issues, environmental hazards (such as flood zones or contaminated land), asbestos presence, and legal constraints (like listed building status). These risks impact my inspection by determining the areas of focus, the need for specialized equipment, and possibly the involvement of additional experts. They also influence the safety precautions I need to take on-site.

Question 7

What types of equipment are commonly required for different types of building inspections, and how do you decide which tools to bring?

Answer 7

Answer: Common equipment includes moisture meters for detecting dampness, thermal imaging cameras for identifying heat loss or moisture issues, endoscopes for inspecting hidden spaces, and ladders for accessing roofs and high areas. For structural assessments, tools like crack monitors and laser levels are used. The choice of tools depends on the type of inspection and the findings of the desktop study, ensuring I am equipped to address the specific needs of the inspection.

Question 8

Can you describe a situation where having the right equipment was crucial for the successful completion of an inspection?

Answer 8

Answer: During a condition survey of an older residential property, my thermal imaging camera was crucial in identifying areas of heat loss and hidden dampness that were not visible to the naked eye. This allowed me to provide a comprehensive report to the client, detailing areas that required insulation improvements and damp remediation, which ultimately led to a more accurate assessment and targeted maintenance plan.

Question 8

How do you ensure that you are adequately prepared with the necessary tools and equipment before conducting an inspection?

Answer 8

Answer: I prepare by reviewing the desktop study findings to anticipate the inspection needs. I maintain a checklist of essential equipment and perform routine checks to ensure all tools are in working order. Additionally, I consider the specific requirements of the property and type of inspection, packing any specialized equipment that might be needed. This preparation ensures I am fully equipped to handle the inspection efficiently.

Question 9

Can you explain the importance of conducting surveys in a methodical order and how this benefits both the surveyor and the client?

Answer 9

Answer: Conducting surveys in a methodical order ensures thoroughness and consistency, reducing the risk of overlooking critical areas. It allows for systematic documentation, making it easier to compile a comprehensive and coherent report. For the client, this methodical approach translates to clear, organized findings that are easy to understand and follow, facilitating informed decision-making.

Question 10

How do you typically structure your inspections to ensure that all areas are covered systematically?

Answer 10

Answer: I start with an external inspection, beginning at ground level and working upwards, covering all elevations and external features. Internally, I follow a consistent room-by-room approach, moving from the top floor downwards to ensure I cover all spaces. I use a standardized checklist to ensure no aspect is missed and take detailed notes and photographs to document my findings systematically.

Question 11

What steps do you take to ensure that your inspection reports are easy to read and understand for the client?

Answer 11

Answer: I structure my reports with clear headings and subheadings, use bullet points for key information, and include photographs with annotations to illustrate findings. I provide a summary section highlighting the main issues and recommended actions. I avoid technical jargon, instead using plain language to ensure the client can easily grasp the report’s contents and implications.

Question 12

How do you translate the findings from your inspection into a report that is clear and informative for the client?

Answer 12

Answer: I start by summarizing the key findings and recommendations in a concise overview section. The main body of the report is organized by area or building component, detailing observations and providing context for each finding. I use photographs and diagrams to visually support the text, making the report more engaging and easier to understand. Finally, I include a glossary of terms if necessary to explain any technical concepts.

Question 13

Can you discuss a time when you had to explain complex inspection findings to a client and how you ensured they understood the implications?

Answer 13

Answer: During a pre-acquisition survey, I identified significant structural issues that required immediate attention. I explained these findings to the client by using clear, non-technical language and visual aids, such as annotated photographs and simple diagrams. I also provided a prioritized list of recommended actions, explaining the potential consequences of each issue and the steps needed to address them. This approach helped the client understand the severity of the issues and make informed decisions about the property purchase.

Question 14

What considerations do you take into account to ensure that your inspection report meets both technical accuracy and client readability?

Answer 14

Answer: I ensure technical accuracy by thoroughly documenting my observations and cross-referencing them with relevant standards and guidelines. For client readability, I focus on clear organization, concise language, and visual aids. I also consider the client’s knowledge level, avoiding jargon and providing explanations for any necessary technical terms. Feedback from clients on past reports also informs my approach to continually improve readability.

Question 15

What is RICS Surveying Safely?

Answer 15

Answer: Surveying Safely 2nd edition – 2018, in action 2019. Gives advice on personal responsibilities for members and firms and risk management and assessing risks.

Question 15

What lessons have you learned from past inspections that have influenced your approach to future projects?

Answer 15

Answer: One key lesson is the importance of thorough preparation, which ensures I am well-equipped and informed before arriving on-site. I’ve learned to remain flexible and adaptive during inspections, as unexpected issues can arise that require immediate attention. Clear and effective communication with clients is also crucial, as it ensures they understand the findings and implications, leading to better client satisfaction and project outcomes.

Question 16

Reflecting on your experiences with inspections, what strategies have you found most effective in ensuring comprehensive and accurate assessments?

Answer 16

Answer: Effective strategies include thorough pre-inspection preparation, using a detailed checklist during the inspection, and taking comprehensive notes and photographs. Regularly updating my knowledge of building standards and inspection techniques through CPD activities ensures my assessments remain accurate and current. Post-inspection, I review my findings critically to ensure nothing has been overlooked.

Question 17

Can you explain the differences between condition surveys, planned preventative maintenance (PPM) surveys, and dilapidations inspections?

Answer 17

Answer: Condition surveys assess the current state of a property, identifying defects, maintenance needs, and any potential risks. The primary purpose is to inform property owners or tenants of the building’s condition at a particular point in time. Planned preventative maintenance (PPM) surveys are forward-looking and focus on identifying maintenance work that should be undertaken to prevent deterioration over time. This type of survey is used to create a maintenance schedule that ensures the building remains in good condition. Dilapidations inspections, on the other hand, are concerned with assessing breaches of lease covenants, specifically related to the condition of the property at lease end. These surveys identify the tenant’s obligations for repair or reinstatement before returning the property to the landlord.

Question 18

How do the objectives of a Schedule of Condition differ from those of a dilapidation survey?

Answer 18

Answer: The objective of a Schedule of Condition is to document the state of a property at a specific point in time, typically before the commencement of a lease. This document is then used to limit the tenant’s repairing liabilities by providing evidence of the building’s condition at the start of their tenancy. In contrast, a dilapidation survey is conducted towards the end of a lease term and is focused on identifying and quantifying the tenant’s obligations to repair, redecorate, and reinstate the property as required by the lease terms. While a Schedule of Condition seeks to protect the tenant, a dilapidation survey protects the landlord’s interest in ensuring the property is returned in a specified condition.

Question 19

You mentioned using a drone to take photos of the roof. Can you explain why this method was chosen and what advantages it offers?

Answer 19

Answer: Using a drone to take photos of the roof was chosen because it allows for safe, efficient, and detailed inspection of areas that are difficult or dangerous to access manually. Drones can capture high-resolution images of the roof’s condition, including hard-to-reach spots like chimneys, gutters, and valleys, without the need for scaffolding or ladders, which can be time-consuming and costly. The advantages include improved safety for the surveyor, more comprehensive coverage of the roof area, and the ability to capture a permanent visual record that can be analysed in detail later.

Question 20

What are the key considerations when undertaking a Schedule of Condition compared to other types of inspections?

Answer 20

Answer: When undertaking a Schedule of Condition, the key considerations include ensuring a detailed and accurate record of the building’s state at the time of inspection. This involves taking comprehensive photographs, making clear and precise notes, and documenting any existing defects or areas of wear. It’s important to cover all areas that could be subject to future repairing obligations. The schedule should be clear enough to stand up in legal contexts if disputes arise over repair liabilities. Unlike other inspections, the focus is less on identifying future maintenance needs or potential hazards and more on providing a snapshot of the current condition.

Question 21

How do you ensure that your methodical approach to inspections is both thorough and efficient?

Answer 21

Answer: To ensure a methodical approach, I follow a structured checklist that covers all aspects of the property from top to bottom and inside out. This systematic approach helps in avoiding any oversight. I start with the exterior, moving from the roof down to the foundations, and then proceed to inspect the interior spaces in a logical sequence. Using technology such as drones and cameras also helps in capturing detailed information quickly, making the process both thorough and efficient. Additionally, I maintain good time management practices to ensure that each section is given the appropriate amount of attention without unnecessary delays.

Question 22

What challenges might arise when using technology such as drones in inspections, and how do you address them?

Answer 22

Answer: Challenges when using drones include regulatory restrictions, weather conditions, and technical difficulties such as battery life or signal loss. Regulatory challenges can be addressed by ensuring compliance with local aviation laws and obtaining any necessary permissions or certifications. Weather can be unpredictable, so I plan drone usage on days with favorable conditions and always have a backup plan in case the drone cannot be used. Technical issues are mitigated by conducting pre-flight checks, carrying spare batteries, and having a contingency plan, such as using telescopic poles for camera inspections if the drone is unavailable.

Question 23

What are the essential components of a Schedule of Condition, and how do you ensure its accuracy?

Answer 23

Answer: The essential components of a Schedule of Condition include a detailed description of the property’s condition, supported by photographs and drawings where necessary. The report typically includes external and internal conditions, highlighting any defects, wear and tear, and overall maintenance status. To ensure accuracy, I take extensive high-resolution photographs, use standardized reporting templates, and cross-reference findings with any existing documentation. I also ensure that all descriptions are clear and unambiguous, making it easy for the document to be interpreted in the future.

Question 24

How did you ensure that the Schedule of Condition was a true reflection of the building’s state at the commencement of the lease?

Answer 24

Answer: I ensured that the Schedule of Condition was a true reflection of the building’s state by conducting a thorough and systematic inspection, documenting every relevant aspect of the property’s condition. I used high-quality photographs to provide visual evidence of the condition, and I made detailed notes to accompany these images, describing each element’s state. After the inspection, I carefully reviewed the collected data to ensure nothing was omitted and that all significant observations were accurately recorded. The final Schedule was then cross-checked to ensure consistency and completeness before being appended to the lease.

Question 25

How do you determine which elements of the building to document in a Schedule of Condition?

Answer 25

Answer: The elements to document in a Schedule of Condition are determined by the potential areas of liability under the lease terms. Typically, this includes all major structural elements such as the roof, walls, floors, and foundations, as well as any internal fixtures, fittings, and finishes that the tenant might be responsible for maintaining. I also focus on any existing defects, areas of wear, or damage that could be contentious in future dilapidations claims. The goal is to provide a comprehensive record that covers all aspects that could be subject to repair obligations.

Question 26

How do you communicate the findings of a Schedule of Condition to a client to ensure they understand their future repairing liabilities?

Answer 26

Answer: I communicate the findings of a Schedule of Condition by presenting the report in a clear, structured format with a summary of key points at the beginning. I explain the purpose of the Schedule and how it protects the client’s interests. During the discussion, I highlight any significant findings, explain their implications, and discuss how the document will be used to limit their repairing liabilities. I ensure the client understands the terminology used and provide visual aids like annotated photographs to clarify the condition of the property. Follow-up discussions are encouraged to address any questions or concerns.

Question 27

In what ways can a Schedule of Condition protect a tenant’s interests, and how do you advise your clients on its importance?

Answer 27

Answer: A Schedule of Condition protects a tenant’s interests by providing a documented baseline of the property’s condition at the start of the lease, which can be referred to in disputes over repairs at lease end. It limits the tenant’s liability to only the repairs necessary to return the property to its initial condition, excluding any pre-existing defects or wear. I advise clients on its importance by explaining that without this document, they could be held responsible for returning the property to a better condition than it was in at the lease start, potentially incurring significant costs.

Question 28

Can you describe a situation where the Schedule of Condition played a crucial role in limiting a client’s liability during a lease term?

Answer 28

• When acting for a LL to defend a claim.
• I analysed the appended SoC and noticed that 8 cladding sheets were damaged, which were claimed for in the dilapidations schedule.
• I advised that the client should not repair/replace sheets and this was successfully removed from the claim.

Question 29

Reflecting on your experience with the Schedule of Condition in Leicester, what did you learn that you would apply to future inspections?

Answer 29

Answer: Reflecting on the Leicester Schedule of Condition, I learned the importance of being thorough and methodical in documenting every detail, even those that might seem minor at the time. This experience reinforced the value of using technology, such as drones, to capture areas that are difficult to access. I also learned the importance of clear communication with the client to ensure they understand the purpose and implications of the Schedule. For future inspections, I would continue to use these techniques, while also refining my process for efficiency and accuracy based on the lessons learned.

Question 30

How do you ensure continuous improvement in your inspection techniques and reporting?

Answer 30

Answer: I ensure continuous improvement by actively seeking feedback from clients and colleagues, reflecting on each project to identify areas for enhancement, and staying updated with industry best practices and emerging technologies. I regularly engage in CPD activities, such as attending workshops, seminars, and training courses relevant to building surveys and inspections. Additionally, I review and revise my templates and checklists to incorporate new insights and feedback, ensuring that my reporting remains accurate, clear, and aligned with client needs.

Question 31

How did you approach the site inspection for the PPM at Somme Barracks to ensure a comprehensive assessment of all relevant building elements?

Answer 31

Answer: I approached the site inspection by first reviewing any available documentation and plans of the building to understand its layout and key areas. On-site, I conducted a systematic walkthrough, dividing the building into sections: roof, external areas, and internal rooms. I used a checklist to ensure that all critical elements were inspected thoroughly, including roof coverings, gutters, walls, floors, and ceilings. I also noted any visible signs of wear or potential issues. By systematically covering each area, I ensured that all relevant building elements were assessed comprehensively.

Question 32

What inspection techniques and tools did you use to evaluate the condition of the roof, external, and internal areas at Somme Barracks?

Answer 32

Answer: For the roof, I used a drone to inspect hard-to-reach areas and obtain detailed images of the roof’s condition. For external areas, I conducted a visual inspection supplemented by a moisture meter to detect any damp issues. Internally, I used a combination of visual inspections and infrared thermography to identify any hidden problems such as thermal bridging or moisture ingress behind walls. These tools and techniques helped me to gather accurate data on the building’s condition.

Question 33

How did you systematically record and categorize the condition of each building element during your inspection for the PPM schedule?

Answer 33

Answer: During the inspection, I recorded observations using a standardized form that categorized each building element into sections (roof, external, internal). For each element, I documented its condition, any visible defects, and the maintenance required. I used photographs to visually document the condition and included these images in the report for reference. Each element was rated for urgency and assigned a recommended timeframe for maintenance based on its condition and potential impact on the building.

Question 34

What were the key factors you considered in your inspection that influenced the urgency and timing of the maintenance recommendations in the PPM schedule?

Answer 34

Answer: Key factors included the severity of the observed defects, the potential impact on the building’s structural integrity or occupant safety, and the likelihood of further deterioration if maintenance was delayed. I also considered the operational requirements of the building and the budget constraints. Elements that posed immediate risks or could lead to significant damage if not addressed promptly were prioritized for urgent maintenance, while less critical issues were scheduled for longer-term planning.

Question 35

Can you detail the inspection process you used to assess the different building elements at Somme Barracks, and how did you ensure the accuracy of your condition reports?

Answer 35

Answer: The inspection process involved a thorough examination of each building element, starting from the roof and working down to the internal areas. I used a structured approach, systematically assessing each area against established criteria. To ensure accuracy, I cross-referenced my observations with existing building plans and used multiple inspection tools to validate findings. Detailed notes and high-resolution photographs were taken to support the condition report. I reviewed and verified the data before finalizing the report to ensure that all information was accurate and comprehensive.

Question 36

What challenges did you face during your inspection of the property, and how did you address them to ensure accurate documentation in the PPM schedule?

Answer 36

• Accessing high places, which I addressed using the drone.
• Weather conditions, so I planned for favourable weather.
• Lots of rooms, so took annotated floor plan.

Question 37

How did you verify that your descriptions, conditions, and maintenance recommendations in the PPM were based on a thorough and objective inspection?

Answer 37

Answer: I verified my descriptions and recommendations by cross-referencing my findings with industry standards and best practices for building maintenance. Each observation was documented with supporting photographs and detailed notes. I reviewed the condition descriptions and recommendations with colleagues to ensure objectivity and consistency. Additionally, I used a structured format for the report to ensure that all elements were assessed and documented systematically.

Question 38

In what ways did your inspection methodology contribute to the development of a clear and actionable PPM schedule for the client?

Answer 38

Answer: My inspection methodology contributed to a clear and actionable PPM schedule by providing a detailed, systematic, and organized assessment of the building. By categorizing and prioritizing maintenance tasks based on urgency and condition, I created a schedule that was easy for the client to understand and act upon. The inclusion of cost estimates and recommended timeframes allowed the client to plan and budget for future maintenance effectively.

Question 39

During the industrial roof survey at Corby, how did you identify and document the issues such as corrosion and UV degradation?

Answer 39

Answer: I identified corrosion and UV degradation through a combination of visual inspection and tactile methods. Corrosion on gutters and cut edges was observed as rust staining and deterioration. For UV degradation, I looked for signs of brittleness and discoloration on the GRP rooflights. I documented these issues using high-resolution photographs and noted specific locations and severity levels in my inspection report.

Question 40

Can you discuss the options you evaluated for rectifying the defects in the roof and how you determined the best solution for your client?

Answer 40

Answer: I evaluated options including applying a liquid coating system to the gutters and areas of cut edge corrosion, replacing the damaged rooflights, and performing a complete roof replacement. I assessed each option based on factors such as cost, durability, quality, and the impact on the building’s operational continuity. The liquid coating system was chosen for its cost-effectiveness and long-term protection, while replacing the rooflights was necessary to address the UV degradation and ensure proper light transmission and safety.

Question 41

How did you balance quality, cost, and programme implications when recommending remedial works for the roof at Corby?

Answer 41

Answer: I balanced quality, cost, and programme implications by conducting a detailed analysis of each option. I considered the longevity and effectiveness of each proposed solution against its cost and the time required for implementation. I recommended a solution that provided a balance of high-quality results and cost-efficiency while minimizing disruption to the client’s operations. I also factored in any warranties or guarantees associated with the remedial works to provide added value and reassurance.

Question 42

What were the main components of the specification you produced for the roofing works, and how did it address the identified defects?

Answer 42

Answer: The specification included detailed descriptions of the remedial works required, such as applying a liquid coating system to address corrosion and replacing the GRP rooflights. It outlined the materials to be used, the methods of application, and quality standards to be adhered to. The specification also included a timeline for the works and any necessary health and safety considerations. This comprehensive specification ensured that the work addressed all identified defects and met the required standards for durability and performance.

Question 43

Reflecting on the inspections conducted for the PPM schedule and roofing works, how have these experiences influenced your approach to conducting and documenting inspections?

Answer 43

Answer: Reflecting on these inspections, I have recognized the importance of a systematic and thorough approach to both inspections and documentation. I have improved my use of technology for better accuracy and efficiency, such as incorporating advanced tools for detailed inspections. I have also learned to provide more detailed and clear reports to enhance client understanding and decision-making. These experiences have reinforced the need for comprehensive documentation and proactive communication throughout the inspection process.

Question 44

What methods or techniques have you found most effective for improving the accuracy and reliability of your inspection reports?

Answer 44

Answer: The most effective methods for improving accuracy and reliability include using a structured inspection checklist, employing high-quality photographic documentation, and utilizing advanced diagnostic tools. Ensuring that all observations are cross-referenced with industry standards and best practices also contributes to the reliability of the reports. Regular peer reviews of my reports have also helped to catch any errors and enhance the overall quality.

Question 45

How do you incorporate feedback from previous inspections into your practice to enhance the quality and effectiveness of your inspection processes?

Answer 45

Answer: I incorporate feedback by reviewing client comments and identifying areas for improvement. For example, if feedback indicates that certain aspects of the inspection report were unclear, I revise my reporting format to include more detailed explanations and visual aids. I also use feedback to refine my inspection techniques and tools, ensuring they meet the evolving needs of clients and industry standards.