Influenza II and PHA Flashcards
What genetic sequences does the influenza virus contain?
For many glycoproteins:
- Matrix protein (M1)
- Matrix protein (M2)
- Haemagglutinin
What does the M2 of the influenza virus do?
What does this impact?
Forms an activated, amatadine inhibited proton (H) channel that is INSERTED into the APICAL membrane of the HOST cell during infection
Protons move through the channel and impact on the function of the ENaC channel
What impact does M2 over expression have on ENaC currents?
How were these currents measured?
Reduced ENaC currents compared to the control (non-transfected, GFP expressing cells)
Measured using whole cell current measured with the patch clamp
How can M2 over expression reduce the currents of ENaC?
- Reduces Po
- Channel number
What is the evidence that M2 decreases ENaC protein in the membrane?
Looking at the alpha and beta subunits in a Western Blot:
- In the absence of M2
- In the presence of M2
What occurs to the alpha and beta subunits in the Western Blot analysis in the presence of M2?
What does this show?
- Density of both bands are REDUCED
- Larger reduction in the beta band
Shows:
- Reduction in the N number
What aspect of influenza does the over expression of the M2 protein mimic?
Mimicks one part of the infection, rather than looking at the direct infection
What could the reduction in the N number of ENaC channels in the membrane be a result of?
- Channels not getting to the membrane
OR
- Channels being removed from the membrane (endocytosis)
What happens to the current in the presence of ENaC and M2 compared to M2 alone?
Huge reduction in current recorded (almost no current) in ENaC and M2
How can you tell if M2 promoted the removal (endocytosis) of ENaC from the membrane?
Exploit a Liddle’s mutant version of ENaC (Liddle’s mutant is RESISTANT to endocytosis):
If over express the mutant and endocytosis has NOTHING to do with the response –>
Would see the SAME reduction in the current as in the WT ENaC channel
If over express the mutant and endocytosis is promoted by the M2 protein –>
Won’t be as big of a DROP in the current (Liddle’s mutant prevents endocytosis –> reduce inhibition by M2)
Does M2 promote the endocytosis of the ENaC channel?
How is this seen?
Yes - a significant amount of the reduction in the ENaC current in the presence of M2 is due to promoting endocytosis
Reduction in the current but not the extent of the WT
What molecules may be involved in the promotion of endocytosis of the ENaC channel from the membrane n the presence of M2?
ROS and PKC
How is it seen that ROS may be involved in the promotion of endocytosis of the ENaC channel from the membrane n the presence of M2?
Seen using RFP-M2 and GFP (that shows the presence of ROS):
- Co localisation data shows that where M2 is expressed is the same position as where ROS is made (glows orange)
- ROS is not made in RFP only cells (No M2)
However, NOT sufficient to say that M2 CAUSES ROS increase (cause doesn’t mean consequence - may be incidental)
What is seen in GFP-M2 cells that are exposed to GSH?
Why?
What does this show?
- INCREASE the ENaC current (reversal of the M2 dependant reduction of the ENaC current)
- Due to the reversal of the increase of ROS increase as GSH is an antioxidant
- Reducing inhibition of ENaC
Shows that the over expression of M2 increases ROS production that have a role in the inhibition of ENaC
How is it seen that PKC may be involved in the promotion of endocytosis of the ENaC channel from the membrane n the presence of M2?
Using inhibitors of PKC (Go6796 and inhibt):
- If PKC is involved in the M2 dependant inhibition of ENaC
- -> inhibition of PKC will reverse the inhibition of ENaC (this is the case)
So, overall what does the overexpression of M2 cause and how?
- Decrease in Po of ENaC
- Decrease in the N of ENaC channels in the membrane (by endocytosis)
- Some of which is meditated by ROS and PKC
- ROS increase
- PKC stimulation
How do ROS and PKC interact?
Not yet sure, they COULD be in the same pathway
Why is the impact on the ASL by influenza complex?
Different studies of influenza show alternative ideas:
- Some show the hight of the ASL to increase
- Some show the height of the ASL to decrease
What are the differences that may explain why different studies show the ASL to increase/decrease?
In different studies:
Different CELL SOURCE
- STRAINS of mice
- Difference in the genetics of humans and how we respond to influenza (some have more serious symptoms than others)
Influenza VIRUS PROPERTIES
- Different influenza viruses have different properties
Different LAB CONDITIONS (experimental conditions)
As well as ENaC, which other channel function is inhibited with infection by influenza?
CFTR
How is CFTR activated with Forskolin?
Forskolin activates cAMP that activates CFTR
What is the response of CFTR to Forskolin a measure of?
The function of the CFTR channel and Cl secretion
What is the difference in the SCC when treat the cells with Forks in infected/non-infected cells?
What does this show?
What is this response with GlyH and Amiloride?
Non infected cells:
- Large increase in current when exposed to Forks
Infected cells:
- No increase in current with Forks
- Shows an inhibition of the CFTR channel (unable to respond to Forks)
Reduces amiloride and GlyH sensitive SCC in the infected cells - shows inactivation of ENaC and CFTR prior to treatment
What does GlyH do?
Inhibit CFTR