Influence of Southern whites in the Democratic Party Flashcards
What was the attitude of the 3 branches of govt in the years between the end of Reconstruction and the Great Depression?
Supreme Court - invariably endorsed Southern white behaviour
Although most black Northerners voted for Republican candidates, NAACP magazine, ‘The Crisis’, told readers in 1924 - ‘Republicans are just as bad as Democratic and Democratic presidents are little better than nothing’
Congress - unhelpful - influence of Southern whites in the Democratic Party
Who did the Democratic party in 1933 consist of?
- The ‘Solid South’
- Urban (mostly Catholic) ethnic voters in the North
- Workers and middle-class liberals across the nation
Who were the ‘Solid South’?
- Prior to 1960s - voters in South invariably voted Democrat
- The vast majority of those voters were white
How did the Republican role in the Civil War era affect black and white voting for many decades?
- Republicans had initiated the end of slavery
- Had led the North to victory over the South
- Imposed reconstructed on the South
As a result - most black Americans favoured the Republicans Party, while white Southerners invariably voted Democrat
What were Southern Democrats determined to maintain?
The social, economic and political inferiority of black Americans and their domination of the Democratic Party in the South helped them to do so.
How did the Southern Democrats maintain their supremacy?
1) South’s single-party system - led to the repeated re-election of the same Democrat candidates
2) Long-serving Southern Democrat senators and representatives gained disproportionate influence in the US Congress under seniority rules
3) Gave them over half the committee chairmanships and control of key committees - enabled them to block legislation they opposed
How did Southern Democrats compare with other Democrats?
- Were far more conservative and resistant to change than other Democrats, particularly with regard to race
Who publicised the many grievances of black Americans in the decades after Reconstruction?
- Ida B. Wells
- NAACP
Why did black Americans have grievances in 1933?
The political, social and economic status of black Americans was markedly inferior to that of white Americans, particularly in the South.
What was the political status of black Americans in the North and the South, in 1933?
North:
- Had the vote
- A few black politicians - Oscar De Priest - but didn’t win state-wide office - many whites would only vote for white candidates
South:
- Few AAs allowed to vote - white registrars set them impossibly difficult Qs to meet literacy qualifications
- Expensive poll tax - most black Southerners poor
- ‘Uppity’ blacks - tried to exercise the franchise risked violence and intimidation
- Southern politics dominated by Democrats
What was the social status of black Americans in the North and the South, in 1933?
North:
- De facto segregation kept urban pop. crowded into ghettos - Harlem (NY) and South Side (Chicago)
South:
- JC Laws - de jure segregation - public places - schools, buses, railroad cars, hospitals, libraries, parks and restaurants
- Black males avoided eye contact with white females - or they’d be accused of harassment
- AAs expected to step aside if white person approached sidewalk
What was the economic status of black Americans in the North and the South, in 1933?
North:
- Growing black middle class - 1914 - a. Philip Randolph married wealthy widow who graduated from 1 of few black unis, Howard
- Opportunities better than South - poor education limit prospects of most who migrated
- Some migrants - well-paid work in Detroit car factories or meatpacking houses in Chicago or East St Louis
- Most AA in North poor
South:
- Many AAs in south - sharecropping or tenants farmers - some in industry (e.g. steelworks in Birmingham, Alabama)
- Poor education in segregated + underfunded schools
- AAs across nation constituted majority of unskilled workers - domestic help, shoeshine boys, bellhops, railroad porters and waiters/waitresses
What was the legal status of black Americans in the North and South, in 1933?
North:
- Lynching not uncommon - bad treatment in courts and by police
- Malcolm X’s brother Wilfred Little saw little difference between Michigan and South in the 1920s and 30s
- Police gave AAs little or no protection over lynchings and during race riots
South:
- Many whites - considered violence and lynching as acceptable form of race control
- Whites dominated law enforcement - judges and juries all-white - AAs lacked protection under law
What is an illustration of the influence of Southern whites in the Democratic Party, in the 1920s?
The fate of anti-lynching bills in Congress.
What were the statistics on lynching between 1901 and 1929?
Over 1,200 AAs lynched in South - mostly Georgia (250) and Mississippi (255)