Influence of childhood on relationships Flashcards
How are childhood experiences can affect later relationships intro:
Psychologists have suggested that our childhood experience impacts upon the type of relationships we later form in adult life
Bowlby’s theory of attachment
The attachment system is related to the concept of the internal working model proposed by Bowlby. Bowlby theorised that later relationships are likely to be a continuation of early attachment styles (secure or insecure) as the primary attachment figure promotes an internal working model of relationships which will set the standard for later relationships.
Attachment as a lifelong phenomenon
- Attachment behaviour throughout life
- Patterns established in childhood affect the quality of adult relationships through acquired internal working model.
- An individual’s childhood attachment style determines the way he/she approaches romantic relationships in adult life.
How ignoring a child could lead to low friendship/ trust.
- Maternal sensitivity; initial cause of quality of attachment, the caregiver ignores the child.
- This would be classed as insecure avoidant
- Internal working model; view of self and others = sceptical about love; its existence or durability.
- Behaviour in adult relationships; Hard to find partner they trust, low friendship and trust.
AO2: Bowlby’s theory of attachment evaluation; evidence regarding continuity from childhood to adulthood (Waters et al)
Waters et al. (2000) retested adults for their attachment style 20 years after having first assessed them at 12 months old. They found a high degree of stability, with 72% of adults receiving the same classification from adult attachment tests as they did in infancy from the Strange Situation.
AO2: Bowlby’s theory of attachment evaluation; evidence regarding continuity from childhood to adulthood (Lewis et al)
Lewis et al. (2000) on the other hand reported much lower attachment stability from their longitudinal study. They compared the attachment classification of children at one year of age with their classification at 18 years of age. With a stability of 42%, no strong evidence for consistency over time was found.
AO2: Bowlby’s theory of attachment evaluation; evidence regarding continuity from childhood to adulthood (Fraley et al)
- Conducted a meta-analysis of strange situation studies
- Prospective studies
- At 12 months and again at 9 years
- finding posi- tive correlations between early attachment type and later rela- tionships supporting the the theory.
- 0.27 Correlation = relatively weak.
Summarise the extent to which there is continuity in attachment type from infancy to adulthood.
- Roughly 50% would’ve stayed in the same category just by chance anyway
- So as expected in Waters et al, but Lewis et al shows lower attachment type consistency
- Misted inclusive findings with a weak-moderate trend.
AO2: Evidence on specific adult behaviour; Senchak and Leonard (1992)
Individuals with an anxious/resistant attachment as children have the most short-term romantic relationships, often entering into relationships quickly and becoming angry when their love is not reciprocated. Indeed, Senchak and Leonard (1992) found that anxious/resistant men acquired their marriage licences after shorter courtships than secure or anxious/avoidant men.
AO2: Evidence on specific adult behaviour Campbell et al.
Better marital adjustment was seen in relationships where both partners were securely attached than when one or both partners were insecurely attached. (general finding)
Anxious/avoidant individuals are the least likely to enter into a romantic relationship: they are most likely to keep their distance and the most likely to say that they’ve never been in love (Campbell et al. 2005).
Draw a conclusion about the evidence on specific adult behaviour as a whole.
- Adulthood attachment type is a decent predictor across the attachment types of adult relationships.
- Though these are clustered together in this way, they have no link between childhood and adult relationships (except Senchak & Leonard)
Alternative (genetic) explanations for attachment (IDA); Kagans Temperament Hypothesis.
K hypothesis; We inherit genes from our parents- so we inherit attachment types
- Kagan explains how children are innately avoidant etc, so the parents will respond to the child’s behaviour, rather than their behaviour causes the child to have a certain attachment type.
- So the temperament hypoth would predict that there is continuity between adults love style and the infants.
Alternative (genetic) explanations for attachment (IDA); How does Kagans hypoth relate to the Internal working model.
- IWM expresses that behaviour is learnt from the way parents treat their child
- Where as the temperament hypoth is innate (genetic)
- Favours nature to nuture
What would we expect to find if the influence of genetics and IWM was tested?
- That because MZ =100% of genes and DZ=50% genes, they would have different attachment types
- But the IWM would suggest that they should be the same because they are bought up in the same environment.
Studies testing the temperament hypoth against IWM (Waller and Shaver)
In this first behavior genetic study of romantic love, biometric model fitting reveals that in contrast to other personality and attitude domains, where genetic factors account for approximately 50% of the reliable variance and shared environment has little effect, individual differences in romantic love are due almost exclusively to environment. Moreover, the common family environment plays a sizable role in determining love styles, a finding compatible with theories stressing the importance of family inter-actions in personality development
MZs = 0.26 DZs = 0.25