Infant vocalisations (5) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Methodological constraints

A
  • record infant vocalisations and take a snapshot … not representative of whole speech signal
  • monotonous to record whole speech signal
  • need to do inter-rater reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Burder et al (2008)

A
  • predominance of ‘modal’ phonation in infants
  • non modal = loft register (high freq.) and bi phonation
  • variability between and within children
  • 3 early categories:
    1. vowels (mid pitch, full vowels or quasi vowels)
    2. squeals (high pitch)
    3. growls (low pitch/ mid pitch)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Iyer and Oller (2008)

A
  • F0 = infants higher and more variable than adults
  • infants have a higher larynx
  • infants with hearing loss have a more variable F0 than TD infants because of less auditory feedback so there is a more variable pitch range
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Structure of infant vocal tract

A
  • overlapping pharynx and nasopharynx in young infants
  • small vocal tract cavity restricts tongue movement
  • raised larynx
  • physiological constraints effects vocalisations until 7 months old
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Oller (1980)

A

Classification of prelinguistic production (infra phonology)

  • 1-4 months = primitive articulation stage. Vocal production incorporates articulator movements at back of vocal tract and tongue and epiglottal contact with soft palate used to produce stop consonants
  • 3-8 months = expansion/exploratory stage. Vocal production more fully open, fully resonant sounds produced, slow sequence of CV articulation with long transitions and individual isolated symbols
  • 5-10 months = canonical syllable stage. Faster transitions leading to canonical syllable stage. Repetition of CV.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oller et al (2013)

A
  • functional flexibility - ability to produce a set of sounds with a variable meaning e.g. ‘I got a B for my essay’ - joy or anger
  • intonation indicates mood or emotion (prosody)
  • 3 types of vocalisations occur within full range of expression at 3-4 months e.g. squeals, vowel-like sounds and growls
  • BUT infant cry and laughter shows functional stability
  • cry = negative
  • laugh = positive

METHOD
- 9 infants at 3 different stages in first year of life and looked at parent and child interaction and coded for facial expressions e.g. smiling and grimacing

RESULTS

  • most vocalisations are neutral - reflected different states of mind
  • cry and laughter are highly related - pos and neg
  • squeal, vacant and growl are very variable and neutral
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McCune and Viham (2001)

A
  • earliest stable consonants are stops and nasals involving simple raising and lowering of the jaw
  • distinct patterns in produced consonants
  • nasals and stops early on in babbling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fromkin (2001)

A
  • early stages of babbling are universal

- the 12 most frequent consonants of the world’s languages comprise 95% of all consonants produced in early babbling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Davis and MacNeilage (1995)

A
  • frame/content theory of early speech organisation, early speech dominated by cycles of mandibular oscillation - the starting tongue position determines both consonant and vowels
  • infants babbling - jaw up and down
  • tongue position seems to matter a lot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

McCune and Vihman (2001)

A
  • infant gains greater voluntary control over consonant articulation - concept of vocal motor schemes (VMS), production of a lot of occurrences of a given consonant in each of the 3/4 successive 30min observational sessions, consistency and stability in production
  • correlational relationship between production and later development
  • correlation between no. of consistent VMS produced and no. of words produced when producing language - later stages
  • significant correlation between age/ rate of VMS and no. of referential words produced at 16 months - close interaction between phonetic progress and development of a lexicon
  • greater VMS = greater early word production
  • children base words on early vocal repertoire
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Baysson-Bardies (1993)

A
  • influence of ambient language:
  • Nigerian = VCV
  • French = CVCV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Meltzoff et al (2009)

A
  • Chinese infants produce Chinese tones
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social interaction effecting infant vocalisation

A
  • parental behaviour influences infant responsiveness

- infant behaviour influences caregiver responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Blooma nd Lo (1990)

A
  • adults show a preference for 3 month olds
  • syllabic > vocalic
  • attractive syllabic > non attractive syllabic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Beumont and Bloom (1993)

A
  • adults give higher ratings to syllabic babbling, even between boys and girls
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Grous-Louis et al (2006)

A
  • unstructured play session
  • 10 month old infant
  • mothers responded with vocal feedback compared to interactive responses
  • e.g. smile when an infant makes a sound
  • e.g. vowel like sound/ consonant vowel
  • feedback guides vocalisation development
17
Q

Goldstein et al (2003)

A
  • 8 month old mother-child
  • yolked social groups - not directly responding to infant behaviour
  • contingent social group - direct response
  • contingent = rapid restructuring and incorporating phonological patterns from caregiver speech
  • non-contingent feedback did not restructure
  • discover babbling patterns using generalisations
18
Q

Pattern et al (2014)

A
  • some evidence of late onset or qualitative differences in babbling infants with hearing impairment and speech and language disorders
  • retrospective study;
  • late onset canonical babbling in those who were later diagnosed with autism (cause of effect?)
  • 23/37 diagnosed with ASD
  • therefore, not a predictor of later ASD
19
Q

Oller et al (2010)

A
  • diagnosis
  • day-long audio recordings collected naturally
  • differentiated TD and autism/ speech and language difficulties
  • automated analysis should be used
  • TD = more canonical
  • autistic = shorter duration of utterances
  • objective evaluation (+)
  • identify and treat (+)
  • higher accuracy (+)
20
Q

Huckvale et al (2009)

A
  • KLAIR - a virtual infant for spoken language acquisition research
  • records caregiver interaction
  • caregivers learn through interaction, not passive observation
  • encourages parents to practice interaction