infant perception Input Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Features of IDS

A

attention, emotional affect, language-specific phonological information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CDS is universal

A

Fernald 1992: most cultures (although limited testing); produced by all ages and carers older than infant =. Prosodic patterns in IDS are universally markers of basic emotions, and consistent rise fall patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cristia 2010: suprasegmental characteristics

A

prosody, higher mean F0, larger Fx range, enhanced intonation patterns, shorter utterances and longer pauses
Kuhl 1997: expanded vowel space- enhancing phonemic contrasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

is CDS for teaching or only affective? Burnham 2002

A

Both! compared PDS and IDS- only IDS showed vowel hyper-articulation; only necessary for IDS not PDS (not just affective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of CDS

A

McMurray 2014- counter arguments suggest segment seen result from reduction in speech rate; enhanced VOT; account for by slower speaking rate
McMurray 2013: variance within vowel categories not a clear message anymore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adaptive characteristics of IDS

A

to stage of dev- more pitch exursion in early infancy- more overlap of VOT values for voiced stops than in late infancy (Sundberg & Lacerda, 1999; Baran 1977)
- in line with Lindblom dynamic adaptations
Changes in prosodic enhancements- more exagerated to younger children but becomes more disinct at 2.5y (Vousoughi and roy 12)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Smith and Trainor 2008

A

Woman speaking to baby but baby’s response is being created by person in room- can reinforce high pitch in mothers IDS (done in response to baby’s response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Liu 2003

A

IDS in 6-8m is less than at 10-12m.
correlation in vowel expansion in speech of mandarin mothers to their infants, and their infant’s discrimination of native affricate-fricative contrast. - more extreme IDS learns faster land language develops quicker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kaplan 2002

A

Impact of pitch- depressed mothers (monotone) or not. non-depressed condition learnt quicker, BUT no difference if had depressed mothers so more about context or unfamiliarity
- expression/animation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

IDS + social interaction?

A

Kuhl 2003: chinese IDS used wiht the english speaking infants; difference between real human, video or audio – reacting to child is best for learning despite same input
Replicated: Roseberry 2014

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Joint attention for IDS is very important

A

Tomasello:
- predict later success, most important for first year.. but ASD don’t have this and still learn but do have delayed language?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Autism effect on IDS

A

Watson et al 2013: reduced attention during CDS compared to age matched peers, not influenced by live/no live looking times.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CHILDES

A

child language data exchange system- (MAcWhinney) massive corpus of videos of IDS lots of examples of IDS; cross linguistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

TalkBank

A

Transcript and media data from conversations with adults and older children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Individual variation

A

mothers utterances varied substantially, produced between 1000 and 3200 words per hours. One study based on recording of 78 mothers monthly over a 6m period, estimated an average daily expsure of 113000 words with a SD of 4200 words (Gilkerson and richards 2007)
huge differences!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Deb Roy MIT met lab 2009

A

corpora is snapshit- speechome project shows millions of hours and look at lots of information

17
Q

LENA digital processor

A

records up to 16 hours as a time- very advanced statistical models and computes automatically but does make errors- commercial product!

18
Q

Wang 2015

A

IDS–ADS differences are NOT modulated by prosodic boundaries, lexical stress, or addressee’s age. Thus, infants are receiving slightly different input directly addressed to them regardless of whether or not they are attending primarily to prosodic positions

19
Q

Martin 2015

A
  • Sound contrasts in a large corpus of recorded spontaneous jap speech demonstrations
  • Small significant tendency for contrasts in IDS to be less clear than those in ADS
  • Caregivers actively enhance phonetic categories in IDS