Inequality and Growth Flashcards
What are the 3 Stages of the Kuznets curve ?
1) Low levels of per capita income and low levels of inequality
2) As per-capita income increases, inequality increases
3) As per-capita income increases, inequality decreases
Explain Stage 1 of Kuznets
Economy at subsistence level. No Difference in productivity between jobs. Most of income is spent on not saved. Lack of dynamism.
Explain Stage 2 of Kuznets
Introduction of new technologies to certain industries lead to higher productivity in these sectors. Causes higher returns to these skilled labour. Higher returns lead to some having access to income yielding assets.
Explain Stage 3 of Kuznets
Economy more dynamic and mobile, other sectors receive technological improvements, increasing their productivity and wages. Population moves into the more productive service sector. More groups have access to income yielding assets.
What are the Implications of Kuznets?
‘Trickle-down’ effect means no need for intervention as it will eventually improve standard of living of poor. Development is naturally uneven and sequential
Who supported Kuznets?
Ahluwalia (1976)
Cautions of Kuznets?
1) Sensitive to different measures of inequality
2) Sensitive to functional form
3) Captures between country differences (cross sectional) rather than within-country (panel data)
What did Barrow (2000/2008) argue in relation to Kuznets?
1) Some evidence of inverted curve but KC does not explain most variations in inequality across time/countries
2) Regional Dummies have large explanatory power
Through what channels does inequality impact growth?
1) Credit Market imperfections
2) Political Economy/Fiscal Policy
3) Social Conflict
4) Savings Rate
How do Credit market imperfections impact Growth?
Markets unable to screen borrowers well enough, they impose restrictions such as high rates and collaterals and a minimum loan size. This restricts investment in human capital and entrepreneurial activities. Unequal distribution means less people with the capital. Picketty (2006), more wealth passed down generations the lower social mobility.
What is the Old Political story?
As inequality increases, majority of people are not benefitting from growth thus vote for redistribution. This decreases growth through taxes - savings rate
What is the new political story?
The rich have more influence on political events and demand NO redistribution so growth increases
Social Conflict impact on growth?
Violence/disruption reduces output and productivity as: people aren’t working; resources spent on defensive activities; conflict effects property rights; political uncertainty
How does the savings rate impact inequality and growth?
1) If there is an increasing marginal savings rate, positive relationship between inequality and growth
2) If decreasing marginal savings rate, negative relationship between inequality and growth
What were Neves and Silva’s (2014) challenges to earlier studies?
1) Quality of data
2) Wealth should be the focus NOT income
3) Lack of data comparability across countries/time (unit of analysis, income vs expenditure)
4) Panel Data vs Cross-sectional