Individualistic - Skinner Flashcards
[SKINNER] -Behaviourist Theories
Explain skinner’s theory
Operant conditioning (Learning by consequence)
Rewards and punishments.
Reinforcements - Reinforced behaviour tends to be repeated.
Not reinforced behaviour tends to be extinguished
[SKINNER]
Explain the Skinner Box
Rat accidentally hits the leavers and gets food. It learns =
The rat pulls the lever for food. (Rewarded for pulling lever) - Reinforced Behaviour
When rat pulls lever, it gets shocked through grid on the floor. - Not reinforced behaviour
[SKINNER]
Explain Positive Reinforcement.
Rewarding someone to reinforce behaviour
[SKINNER]
Explain Punishment.
Giving something unpleasant (Prison Sentence, etc) or removing something pleasant (freedom, etc)
[SKINNER]
Explain Negative Reinforcement
Removing an unpleasant stimuli (E.G: Taking a certain amount of time off a criminal’s prison sentence for good behaviour)
[SKINNER]
Explain Positive Punishment
Giving an undesirable consequence (E.G: A prison sentence)
[SKINNER]
Explain Negative Punishment
Removing something desirable (E.G: Freedom lol)
[SKINNER]
Application to criminality.
Explain some negative and positive consequences of criminal behaviour.
Positive: The adrenaline rush, material gain (robbing), attention they receive (publicity)
Negative: Prison sentence, fines, death penalty
[SKINNER]
Application to Criminality
Explain how the findings of the Skinner Box (Scientific Research) account for criminality
If criminal behaviour results in a desirable outcome (reward) it is likely to be repeated.
If criminal behaviour results in undesirable outcome (punishment) it is unlikely to be repeated.
[SKINNER]
Explain the strengths of Skinner’s Theory.
+ Scientific research (An experiment carried out) - Skinner box.
+ Explains that if criminals aren’t punished harsh enough, it will increase the chance of reoffending.
+ Direct experience with the environment can lead to criminal behaviour (eg: media, family, friends)
[SKINNER]
Explain the weaknesses of Skinner’s Theory
Some people choose to be criminals (Freewill)
Ignores the nature side of the debate
If some criminals haven’t had direct experience, why are they still criminal?