Individual Rights Flashcards
Equal Protection
when Government treats people differently
nothing to do with due process
Strict Scrutiny
- applies to race, alienage, national origin
- government has the burden
- law is necessary to achieve a compelling interest
Intermediate Scrutiny
- Gender, illegitimacy (children)
- Government has the burden
- law is substantially related to an important interest
Rational Basis
- applies to everyone else
- plaintiff has the burden
- rationally related to a legitimate interest
Due Process
Government regulating a right for** all people**
Substantive Due Process
Government taking away/regulating a (liberty) right for** all people**
i.e. “all citizens must..”
Fundamental Rights
Strict Scrutiny
1. Right to vote
2. Free Speech
3. Interstate Travel
4. (Privacy Rights)
Non-Fundamental Rights
Rational Basis
i.e. Intrastate Travel
Privacy Rights - Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny
* contraception
* abortion (no more)
* marriage
* procreation
* education
* raise family
If not, then rational basis
Procedural Due Process
Property Rights
* government/public jobs
* licenses (i.e. law)
* public benefits (i.e. pension)
Make sure the property right is vested to the individual
No levels of scrutiny, but
needs Notice and Hearing
Equal Protection & Due Process
How to identify the correct Amedment?
Federal Law = 5th Amendment
State Law = 14th Amedment
Privileges & Immunities
State passing law that treat **non-residents **differently from residents of the state
Don’t confuse with Equal Protection
13th Amendment vs. 15th Amendment
13th Amendment:
* banned slavery
* Private individuals held liable for racial discrimination
15th Amendment:
* Racial discrimination based on voting
Takings Clause
- If Government is taking private property
- for public use*
- they must pay just compensation
public use = any overall public benefit
Inverse Condemnation
- When Government is near your property and doing something that
- reduces the economic benefit of your land
- and the value left is worth nothing
- Govt owes you just compensation
Religion
- Establishment Clause
- Free Exercise Clause
Establishment Clause
- Government cannot pass a law that will formally establishes or sponsors a religion
- Government needs to be neutrality
- follow History and Tradition
Always look towards the intent of the Government
Free Exercise Clause
- Every citizen has the right to pratice his or her religion any way they choose
- Government must remain neutral on pratice of religion
A law neutral to religion will be constitutional even if the effect prohibits practice of a religion
Speech
- Is is content based or content neutral?
Content-based regulation
- when government is stopping the message
- Strict Scrutiny
i.e. government says no to march, parade, demosntration
Content-neutral regulation
- just regulating time, place and manner
- Intermediate Scrutiny - regulation furthers significant government interest and leaves open alternative means of communication
Reasonable regulation is constitutional
Under Content-neutral regulation
Public Forum
- Same test (must further significant government interest and open alternative means of communication)
- Streets and Parks
Under Content-neutral regulation
Non-Public Forum
- reasonably related to legitimate interest
- Billboards, Signs, Buses