Individual Differences- Personality Theories And Measurements Flashcards

1
Q

What is personality?

A

Has a long tradition in human culture and has featured in psychological research for over a century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is personality?

A

Persona- Latin for mask
In psychology it is a construct- unobservable but with an impact on behaviour
No single definition
Principles
- internal to the person
- consistent with behaviours
- it is within reason stable over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definitions from more informed people

A

Alport(1956)
‘ the dynamic or organisation within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustments to his environment’

Eysenck (1953)
‘The more or less stable and enduring organisation of a persons character temperament intellect and physique which determines his unique adjustment to his environment’

Cattell (1950)
‘That which permits prediction of what a person will do in a given situation. It is concerned with all the behaviour of the individual both overt and under the skin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Questions you might ask about personality

A

Dynamic or stable?
Biologically determined?- genes and hereditary
Adapted by experience? - environment and social context
What about motivation? What about cognition?
Unique or uncommon?
Personality infers uniqueness?
Personality is on continuum?
Personality as a type?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Measuring personality

A

Society has had new ways of characterising people for centuries (Hippocrates and Galen ect)
Often seen as types in the past and linked to natural phenomena such as seasons, the moon ect
Anthropometrics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Today- measure personality

A

More sophisticated
Assume that personality can be inferred through consistencies within their behavioural response over situations- examine in many ways through idiographic and nomothetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Idiographic- Rorschach ink blots

A

Herman Rorschach (1921)
Presented with paper with ink blots asked to tell what you first see- measures personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)

A

Murray (1935)
-Task to probe the subconscious simmi;are to the Rorschach test
- several versions using ambiguous pictures
- tell a dramatic story about each picture, a typical session involves 8-12 of these cards
- therapist interprets the recurrent themes in the stories and detect emotional disturbance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Measurement issues

A
  • subjectivity and lack of generalisability in idiographic measures
  • self reports in questionnaires
  • reliability and validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Personality types

A
  • distinct from traits
  • attempt to classify individuals as types of people
  • commonly used in the workplace- Myers Briggs personality types Is the most common. Often used to help people understand their co-workers
  • used less in research- not particularly informative about what actually is responsible for our personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types

A

Extrovert- introvert
Sensors- intuitive
Thinkers- feelers
Judgers- perceivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Psychoanalytic theory

A

Freud (1856-1939)
- Instinctual drives
- unconscious processes
- early childhood experiences

Topographic model
- conscious
-Preconscious
-Unconscious
-Freudian slips
-Dreams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychoanalytic model

A

ID- instant gratification, primitive
Superego- moral compass, learned values
EGO- rational and pragmatic, tries to balance ID and superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the psychoanalytic model effect our personality

A

Internal (unconscious) conflicts shape behaviour and personality and can lead to anxiety/ guilt

Defence mechanisms help us deal with internal conflicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The defence mechanisms

A
  • Repression- Girl?what girl?
    -Regression- Leave me alone. I hate you
    -Denial- nope
    -Displacement- no how dare you, now the cat dies
    -Reaction formation - absolutely not! - secretly likes her
    -Conversion reaction- no way, excuse me IBS??
  • rationalisation - she’s too young and smart and rich
    -Isolation - I feel nothing when I look at her
    -Phobic avoidance - its her run away
    -Projection - I think thats more about you than me
    -Sublimation -
    -Undoing- never- perform ritual to purge her from my mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Psychosexual stages

A

Oral stages - birth to 2 years- pleasure from oral stimulation- dependency or aggression, problems with drinking, smoking eating and nail biting
Anal stage- 18 month to 3 years- primary focus on controlling bladder and bowels- anal repulsive(messy wasteful distractive) Vs anal retentive (orderly rigid obsessive)
Phallic stage- 3 to 6- primary focus on genitals, differences between genders. Child becomes rival for the affection from the opposite sex parent (Oedipus complex) child begins to identify with same sex parent- fixation can result in sexual deviances or confused sexual identity, Freud believed that girls continued to process feelings of envy or inferiority (penis envy)
Latency stage- 5-12- sexual desires pushed to background focus on intellectual and social pursuits- important stage for development of communication skills and self confidence
Genital stage- 12 to 18+ - sexual desires renewed- seek relationship with others- problems that emerge in this state are carried over from earlier stages

17
Q

Neo freudian theories- Erikson’s model of psychosocial development

A

Infant- 0-1- trust/mistrust
Toddler- 1-3 - shame/ autonomy
Pre-schooler- 3-5- initiative/guilt
School age- 5-12- inferiority/industry
Adolescent- 12-18 - role confusion/ego,identity
Young adult- 18-40- isolation/intimacy
Middle age- 40-65- stagnation/generativity
Older adult - 65+ despair/ego, inegrity

19
Q

Psychoanalysis in practice

A
  • psychoanalysis/psychotherapy
    -Locate where fixations occur
  • help individual understand and resolve internal conflicts
  • free association, introspection and in depth case study
  • stimulated a lot of work in the early 20th century
  • later developments include Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development
  • others took a different path (jung, 1875-1961 and Adler 1870- 1937)
20
Q

Trait theories

A

’ a trait is a dimension of personality used to categorise people according to the degree to which they manifest a particular characteristic… Burger 1997

21
Q

What are the key characteristics of a trait?

A

Traits are continuous, bi-polar dimensions
Traits are relatively stable over time and show stability across different situations

22
Q

The lexical approach

A

If personality traits are important
- there will be words to describe them
- the more important they are =the more words there will be
- there are thousands of words in the English language that describe aspects of personality- around 4500
-Dictionary and thesaurus used elicit words

23
Q

Timothy Leary’s interpersonal behaviour circle personal inventory

A

-List of words, people asked to read them and put a check mark against those words they feel applies to them
-Circle of eight divisions each with two subdivisions forming a circle divided into 16 categories characterising patterns of behaviour
- leary noted they were similar to the temperaments described by the ancient Galenic doctrine for the 4 humours
P- dominant-hate: competitive, sadistic, aggressive and rebellious
A- submissive hate: distrustful, self-effacing, masochistic, docile
E- dominant-love: narcissistic,managerial, autocratic
I- submissive love: responsible, hyper normal, cooperative, over conventional, dependant

24
Q

Alport and odbert 1936

A

Three- level hierarchy
1- cardinal traits: Synonymous with the person, rare eg- honest Abe Lincoln, mother Theresa
2- central traits: general characteristics found varying degrees in every person- basic blocks of behaviour
3- secondary traits- not as obvious or consistent eg- outgoings person becomes anxious when presenting

25
Q

Cattell (1950-1998)

A
  • larger number of personality traits was needed to get complete picture
  • factor analysis = 16 common traits
  • surface trait (easily observable) Vs source trait (underlying aspects)
  • range of participants
  • certain traits may be better for different professions
26
What happened to 16 personality factors?
It was able to examine profiles from different occupational groups the theory fell out of favour - large number of factors -Lacking hierarchical structure Time and theory - 16 too many so researchers used further factor analysis -Tupes and Christmas (1961) And norman (1963) - agreeableness -Surgency(extraversion) -Conscientiousness -E,optional stability (neuroticism) -Culture But then shifts in psychology- two decades of very little research
27
Hans Eysenck (1916-1997)
Personality linked to biological factors (Ie the nervous system) that impact you on how you interact with the environment Developed with psychiatric patients Factor analysis of traits - establishes clusters of highly correlated traits - normally distributed Two super traits -Extroversion- introversion -Neuroticism- stability P-E-N MODEL In the 70s it was expanded to include psychoticism P- aggression, antisocial,cold E- sociable, active, carefree No anxious,irrational, emotional - Eysenck found that the 3 factors could be used to predict criminal behaviour- in particular psychoticism In 1996- E better predictor of criminality in young persons, N in older persons Miles and Carey (1995)- factors are heritable Furnham and Medhurst (1995)- high P associated with poor acidemic performance
28
The big 5 model - Costa and McCrae 1985
- covers a large proportion of personality related terms (Not all) - openness - willingness to try new things, think outside the box, be vulnerable - conscientiousness - act in socially appropriate ways, control impulses, plan and organise - extroversion - how outgoing people are - agreeableness - how people get along with others - neuroticism - comfortable with self, temper
29
Measuring the big 5
Original NEO-PI Some difficulties in understanding outdated issues Revisions in 1985,1992,2005 (NEO-PI-3: 240 items) Shortened version in 1992 (NEO-FFI:60 items) The big 5 inventory - 44 items (John et al 1991) 5 item personality Inventory/ ten item personality inventory (gosling et al 2003)
30
Evidence for the big 5
Costa and McCrae (1988) examined stability of personality using 5 factors -Adults over 30 have stable personalities - before adulthood personality is more fluid Examined this across European cultures - same 5 factors emerge
31
A universal big 5?
Goldberg (1981/1990) Lexical approach across multiple countries using each languages own lexicon The more languages that reveal the same dimensions, the more likely it is that they are universal (Somer and Goldberg, 1999) Big 5 appear constantly in English Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness tend to repeat internationally
32
The HEXACO model
Ashton et al (2000) Research on the big 5 seemed to often show something that looked like the 6th factor, often referred to as trustworthiness, values of honesty - resulted in the addition of the hostility- humility factor - also emphasised the functional aspects of the factors ( and their costs) - 6th factor doesn't always emerge- also not always independent of other factors (like A and C)
33
The big one - general factor of personality?
A higher order model of personality (Musek,2007) Evidence of evolutionary adaption? Pattern?
34
Evaluating the psychoanalytic approach
- addressed complexity - person focused - massive impact on treatment therapies - was comprehensive and stimulated research But - focused heavily on aggression and sex - case studies made generalisations hard - ignored many other factors in patients lives - lack of testability/falsifiability