Individual Differences Lecture 1 Flashcards
Individual difference types
Personality
Intelligence
Abnormality/ psychopathology
Criminality
sexuality
Age, sex, gender
Cultural, political, religious, ideological differences
Everything (stupid point)
The study of individual differences
We can
- predict differences
- predict similarities
- create meaningful clusters or groupings
- use information to identify abilities/ disabilities/ psychopathologies
- link to other things we know about biology and environment
The field isn’t new
Plato (the republic) - ‘ no two persons are born exactly alike but each differs from the other in natural endowments one being suited for one occupation and the other for another’
Hippocrates and Galen (100BC- 129 AD)
Humorism (Latin meaning fluid)
Sanguine- blood- spring/air- optimistic, cheerful, fun loving
Choleric- yellow bile- summer/fire- leader, ambition, drive
Melancholic- black bile- autumn-earth- kind, considerate, creative, depressed
Phlegmatic- phlegm- winter/water- self- content, kind, shy, relaxed
Anthropometrics- The phrenologists
Franz Joseph Gall (1976)
Influential in the 19th century but falls out of favour by the 20th century
Shape of the skull indicative of psychological traits
Precursor to- modern neurology, modern neuropsychology and theories of modularity
Anthropometrics- Criminal Atavism
Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909)
‘Born criminal’ - although later expanded into social factors
Believed criminals were physically different- somehow born different from non criminals and from each other eg-
- murderers had sloped foreheads
- sexual offenders have full lips
Influential to begin with but had significant limitations (big ol’ racist) criticised for being imprecise, poorly sampled and lacked systematic analysis
Francis Galton (1822- 1911)
Significant scientific contributions in the field
- the phrase nature Vs nurture
- the systematic surveys and questionnaires
- correlation, regression, standard deviation and variance
- the lexical hypothesis
- fingerprinting
- anthropometric data collection
Wrote ‘ hereditary genius’ in 1869
Galton’s beliefs
- human characteristics are normally distributed
- need large, systematically gathered data sets to examine individual differences
- characteristics are heritable- eminent people come from eminent families
- there is something akin to general ability or intelligence
- amount of brain tissue related to intelligence
- intelligence related to sensory acuity
- some groups are superior to others
Evaluating Galton
- leads to the first theories of intelligence
- consideration of sensory and motor abilities eg- reaction time
- emphasis on large samples describe IDs in a population
- the beginning of modern psychometrics
But - his work was the beginning of the eugenics movement and emphasised the superiority of some races/ ethnicities over others
Idiographic
- idios= private or personal
- emphasises individual uniqueness
- deep rich understanding
- qualitative
- aims to tell us something fundamental about a person
Nomothetic
- Nomos= law
- similarities between groups of individuals
- identity consistently occurring traits/ traits clusters
- quantitative
- allows ‘norms’ for comparison- how does one person differ from the population?
Idiographic approaches to individual dufferences
- Sigmund Freud (1856- 1939)- psychoanalysis
- Erik Erikson (1902- 1994)- psychosocial stages
Not all psychoanalysts were purely idiographic
- Karl Jung (1875- 1961)
Idiographic approaches to individual differences- George Kelly (1905- 1967)
- Theory of personal constructs
- in therapy the aim is to change the clients construction of the world
- each person is their own scientist with their own construction of reality (constructs)
- we use these constructs to make sense of the world by predicting and classifying
- self interpretations will differ from others interpretations of you
- you will have constructs that are not shared by others
- unlike psychoanalysis, work focused more on normal, student samples (not patients)
Idiographic approaches to individual differences - Carl Rogers (1902- 1987)
- Person centered therapy
- humanistic focus- people are experts of their own subjective reality
- focuses on a persons feelings and lived experience ( phenomenology)
-‘Self concept’ - who we are based on others feedback about us - ’ self actualisation’- an innate, positive drive to help us maximise our potential
Idiographic approaches to individual differences (Carl Rogers, self actualisation)
- in perfect conditions we would wholly ‘self actualise’
- rarely happens
- aim to be fully functioning person
- open to experience
- characterised by existential living
- trust in their own ability to attribute value
- creative
- live rich lives and are self aware
- rationale- not defensive
- may need help becoming this via counselling and therapy
Evaluating idiographic Approaches
-Philosophical
- real depth of personal understanding
- therapeutic relevance
But
- can you prove the self concept exists? Falsifiability
- generalisability
- problems of data- self- report qualitative case studies
Psychometrics
-Literally mind measurements
- often cant directly observe psychological phenomenon
- create tools ( measure) to help us evaluate them
- measures contain items, items measure specific elements of psychological construct
- psychometrics is the scientific creation and evaluation of items and measures
Psychometrics I fall broadly into two categories
Psychometric tests- items are right/ wrong
Psychometric assessments- often more subjective- like scales
Construct Validity
- how do we know a measure of something measures that something?
Convergent reliability
- in a verbal intelligence measure, vocabulary should correlate with phenome ability
Discriminant validity
- verbal intelligence should not correlate with sporting ability
Concurrent validity
- verbal intelligence should be correlated with other measures of verbal intelligence
Predictive validity
- verbal intelligence should predict test scores on a language test
Face/Content validity
- the verbal intelligence test has items that appear on inspection to be relevant to something we call verbal intelligence