Indicators Flashcards

1
Q

Due to

A

Premise

Due to [data], X=Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For Example

A

Premise

For example [data], X=Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Owing to

A

Premise

Introduces data to help argument.
Owing to X, X=Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Shows that

A

Conclusion

A
B
— ^ shows that v
C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Admittedly

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In contrast

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nevertheless

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In spite of

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Although

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Even though

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

While

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

However

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Still

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Yet

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Whereas

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

But

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Despite

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

On the other hand

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Even so

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Conversely

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Instead

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Surprisingly

A

Shift in Argument.

The author is about to give the OP some credit to their argument and then turn around and destroy those points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Consequently

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Clearly

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Must be that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

It follows that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

As a result

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Therefore

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

So

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

Bratty Child Story

If confused think about arguing with a bratty child. You can list all of your points to try to sway them but will get “So” and some sass in response. It is usually easiest to cut to the chase and give them the direct point (conclusion) your making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Thus

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

That is why

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

32
Q

For this reason

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

Remember “For this reason” entails the reasons or premises given directly before it. Those reasons support what they are about to say making that statement a conclusion.

33
Q

Accordingly

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

34
Q

Conclude that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

35
Q

Hence

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

36
Q

Obviously

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

Snape’s conclusion

37
Q

It is clear

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

Why is it clear? Well anything said above that as a supporting reason.

38
Q

This proves that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

39
Q

And so

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

40
Q

For

A

Statement introduces premise but contains the conclusion.

41
Q

Because

A

Introduces premise but statement contains the conclusion.

42
Q

From the fact that

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

43
Q

Since

A

Introduces premise but statement contains conclusion

44
Q

It is clear from

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

45
Q

As indicated

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

46
Q

After all

A

Premise

Typically used after the conclusion to throw a little bit more on the pile of support.

47
Q

In that

A

Premise

48
Q

This is seen from

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

49
Q

For the reason that

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

50
Q

Studies suggest

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

51
Q

We may conclude

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

52
Q

We may infer that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

53
Q

It implies that

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

54
Q

Given that

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

55
Q

Seeing that

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

56
Q

On the grounds that

A

Premise

Introduces new Data

57
Q

It entails

A

Conclusion

[X=Y]

58
Q

We know this by

A

Premise

Gives reasoning to support prior statement.

59
Q

Rather

A

Shift

60
Q

Alternatively

A

Shift

61
Q

As opposed to

A

Shift

62
Q

Nonetheless

A

Shift

63
Q

Contrary to this

A

Shift

64
Q

On the contrary

A

Shift

65
Q

Listing of information
(1,2,3)

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

66
Q

Moreover

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

67
Q

Furthermore

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

68
Q

Similarly

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

69
Q

As well as

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

70
Q

Also

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

71
Q

… And, …

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

72
Q

In addition

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

73
Q

Besides

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

74
Q

What’s more

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.

75
Q

Additionally

A

Continuity

Adding premises that follow the previous argument.