Income and Wealth Inequality Flashcards

1
Q

equality

A

everyone is treated in the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

extreme poverty

A

household lives on less than $1.90 a day and is unable to meet basic needs of life like food, education or housing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

relative poverty

A

household income is 50% or less than the average income, meaning they have enough to meet basic need but cannot enjoy the same SOL as those with incomes above 50% of the average

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

equity

A

society distributes resources, such as income, benefits and wealth, fairly among people to give them equal opportunities

This might be achieved by taxing wealthier people more than poorer people and redistributing income and wealth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

policies to promote equity

A

More progressive taxation (higher top rate, lower bottom rate/higher tax free allowance); lower regressive tax (VAT)

Benefits - means-tested; universal; UBI

Higher minimum wage

Legislation - discrimination; hiring/firing; leave

Government spending on education

Govt spending on healthcare

key word: MORE progressive tax - tax is lready progressive in most countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluation of increasing top rate of tax

A

Distorts incentives - according to Laffer, the govt may actually collect LESS revenue if taxes rise too much due to (1) tax avoidance/evasion and (2) brain drain reducing employment

increases inequality esp if govt needs to divert resources from public spending to policing tax evasion, and receives less tax revenue from relocated businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluation of reducing regressive taxes

A

fiscal deficit increases, which could lead to austerity policy that will impact poorer people dependent on public services

or could mean increased borrowing, which will increase burden on taxpayers in LT and have a regressive effect anyways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define means-tested benefits

A

benefits paid only to those whose incomes fall below a certain level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define poverty trap

A

individual or family earns more income from benefits than from a low-paying job, reducing the incentive to work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define UBI

A

a regular, unconditional cash paument made by the government regardless of earnings or employment status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define universal benefits

A

benefits available to everyone in certain categories, often age-related, regardless of their income or wealth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define negative income tax

A

money paid out by the govt to people earning below an agreed annual fixed benefit limit

every person receives a fixed annual benefit, and if the tax paid on earning is less than this benefit, the person receives the difference from the govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaluation of offering benefits

A
  1. reduces incentive to work and creates poverty trap - greater strain on govt finances
  2. impact on govt finances - opportunity cost (could be better spend on ed/health to reduce inequality; borrowing, austerity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define the minimum wage

A

legally set minimum amount that a worker must be paid. Intends to increase SOL and reduce relative poverty, as well as boost the incentive to work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pros of NMW

A
  1. reduce both absolute poverty, and relative poverty and inequality - higher SOL
  2. increases the fiscal dividend by increasing tax revenue and reducing spending on welfare benefits
  3. encourages training which increases productivity
  4. fights monopsony power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cons of NMW

A
  1. creates unemployment
  2. causes cost-push inflation
17
Q

final NMW eval

A
  1. regional MW better
  2. better alternatives with more sustainable impact that target the root - improving ed/training
  3. extent of unemployment depends on WES and WED, as well as how high MW is
  4. effect depends on info govt has
  5. if productivity rises by more than wage cost, UE may not take place. Employment may actually rise
18
Q

eval for legislation

A
  1. cost to businesses may force shutdown/relocation to where policy isn’t as strict, reducing employment opportunities
  2. depends on strength of enforcement

final EVAL: risk of govt failure may be high due to unintended consequences - cost of unemployment, lost tax revenue from firms

19
Q

key word: ROOT CAUSE

how does spending on ed/training and healthcare promote inequality?

A

target the root of the problem by increasing productivity and hence MRP

will increase demand for more producitve workers since demand for labour derived from MRP

will increase eq. wage rate and current wages earned, as well as LT earning potential

this reduces difference between rich and poor in the LT. Not dependent on state policy like benefits and taxation that may change with government changes

20
Q

eval for spending on training and ed

A
  1. costly to govt - opp cost? better use of funds?
  2. no guarantee workers will attend schemes if not motivated to increase incomes (could mandate but effect on freedom?)
  3. long time to have effect
21
Q

how does spending on healthcare promote equality

A

if healthcare available more easily and cheaply, workers can receive treatment if they fall ill

this means they can recove more quickly and maintain a high level of productivity

they miss fewer days of work and can perform at an optimum level

this should increase their MRP and… (same explanation as for education)

22
Q

final eval for policy to redistribute income/wealth

A
  1. incentives
  2. govt finances - if they can afford it, go ahead
  3. equitable, but are they efficient considering distorting of incentives and labour market outcomes?
  4. is the inequality so bad that it requires intervention? some income inequality is good, i.e. incentives to increase productivity