Incidental nodules Flashcards
Pro/con of Brock model for assessing risk of malignancy
Good sen
incorporates nodule attenuation
Con: only estimates for high risk population. Overest in low risk pop
Veterans Admin Cooperative model for predicting malignancy limitation
Only validated in high risk pop
Mayo Clinic Model
Based on CXR
more accurate for general population
When is a nodule stable?
Solid–> stable >24mo on CT
Subsolid –> stable >/= 5 years
4 benign patterns of calcification
Likely from prior infection:
- central
- diffuse
- lamellated
Hamartoma:
popcorn
Probability of malignancy ranges
Low - <5%
Intermediate - 5-65%
High- >65%
Solitary solid nodule >8mm next steps
Low risk– CT at 3 mo – unchanged then 9mo CT–> unchanged then 24 mo CT
Intermediate– PET/CT
High– biopsy or excision
solitary solid or subsolid nodules measuring <6 mm in size in patients without risk factors next steps
No follow up required
optional if risk factors present - 12 mo and only if grown then biopsy
Solitary Solid nodule 6 to 8 mm next steps
CT chest 6-12 mo
PET and biopsy not helpful at that size
Solitary Solid nodule 6 to 8 mm next steps after 6-12 mo follow up CT
- nodule growth –> resection or biopsy
- Resolved –> done
- unchanged–> assess risk malignancy
- Low –> done
- High or intermediate –> Chest CT 18-24 mo
Multiple solid <6mm nodules in low risk pt
No need for follow up
Multiple solid <6mm nodules in High or moderate risk pt
optional CT at 12mo
Multiple solid >/= 6mm nodules in High or moderate risk pt
CT 3-6 mo then CT 18-24mo
Multiple solid >/= 6mm nodules in Low risk pt
CT at 3-6 mo then MAYBE CT 18-24
Incidental solitary subsolid nodule <6mm ggo or part solid
No additional follow up