Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Inchoate Offenses > Flashcards

Inchoate Offenses Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Inchoate Crimes

A
  • Attempt
  • Solicitation
  • Conspiracy

These are conduct crimes.

Inchoate offenses were recognized to promote more effective crime prevention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inchoate Crimes

Culpability

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Merger

Attempt

A

A person can be charged with, and tried for, both the attempt and the completed offense for a particular crime.

However, judgment may not be entered against the defendant, and the defendant may not be sentenced, for both the attempt and the completed offense.

So, if a jury convicts the defendant of both, the attempt will merge into the completed offense and the judge will only enter judgment. and sentence the defendant for, the completed offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Merger

Conspiracy

A

A person can be charged with, and tried for, conspiracy, attempt and the completed offense for a particular crime.

Unlike attempt, however, the crime of conspiracy does not merge.

So, if the jury convicts the defendant of all three, while attempt will merge, conspiracy will not.

So there will be two convictions: conspiracy and the completed offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Merger

Solicitation

A

Solicitation merges, like attempt.

So, if a person is charged with, and tried for, solicitation, conspiracy, attempt and the completed offense for a particular crime, and if the jury comes back with guilty on all counts, we would be left with two convictions: conspiracy and the completed crime.

While conspiracy does not merge into a higher offense, solicitation merges into conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common Law

Attempt

A

A person is guilty of attempting to commit a crime if

  • she intentionally engages in sufficient conduct so as to be deemed to move from preparing to commit the crime to perpetrating the crime and
  • does so with the intent that the conduct results in the commission of a crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common Law

Attempt

Mens Rea Elements

A

Attempt requires a dual mens rea and so it is a specific intent crime.

A person has the mens rea for attempt if she acts with:

  • Intent to commit the conduct constituting attempt and
  • Intent that the conduct results in the commission of the crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common Law

Attempt

Mens Rea Requirement

A

While intentionally is commonly understood in the common law as purposely or knowingly, for attempt the defendant must act purposefully.

This does not mean knowledge is irrelevant. If the defendant acted knowingly, the jury may infer the defendant wanted to engage in the conduct or wanted to cause the result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MPC

Attempt

Mens Rea

A

A person has the mens rea for attempt if she acts with the purpose of engaging in the conduct or causing the result

Exceptions:

  • A person is guilty of an attempt to cause a criminal result if she believes the result will occur, even if she doesn’t want it to.
  • For attendant circumstances elements, it is sufficient that the actor possessed the degree of culpability required to commit the target offense.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MPC

Attempt

Actus Reus

A

An actor must do or omit to do something that is a substantial step towards the commission of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Common Law

Attempt to Aid

A

A person is not liable for attempt to aid if the person she aids does not commit or attempt to commit the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MPC

Attempt to Aid

A

A person may be convicted of a criminal attempt, although no crime was committed or attempted by another if

  • the purpose of her conduct was to aid another in the commission of the offense and
  • such assistance would have made her an accomplice in the commission of the crrime if the offense had been committed or attempted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Common Law

Attempt

Actus Reus

A

Attempt requires the defendant to engage in conduct that moves beyond preparation to commit the crime to perpetration of the crime.

Jurisdictions have developed a number of tests to determine if a defendant has committed sufficient conduct to meet this actus reus requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attempt

Factors to Consider

A
  • Whether he act in question appears to be dangerously close to causing tangible harm, so that police intervention cannot realistically be delayed.
  • The seriousness of the threatened harm - the more serious it is, the further back in the series of events that lead up to the crime we’ll go to find the defendant guilty
  • The strenth of the evidence about the actor’s mens rea - the clearer his intent is, the less proximate his acts need to be in the commission of the offense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

A

Last Act

Physical Proximity

Dangerous Proximity

Indespensable Element

Probably Desistance

Substantial Step (MPC)

Res Ipsa Loquitior / Unequivocabity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Culpability

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Last Step

A

A person has committed ther actus reus for attempt when she performs all the acts necessary for the commision of the target offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Physical Proximity

A

A person has committed the actus reus for attempt when she is physically close to performing all the acts necessary for the commission of the target offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Dangerous Proximity

A

A person has committed the actus reus for attempt when she is dangerously close to performing all the acts necessary for the commission of the target offense.

Under this test, the more severe the crime attempted, the further away from the completed attempt that liability will be imposed

Factors to Consider;

  • Nearness of the danger
  • Greatness of the harm
  • Degree of apprehension felt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Indispensable Element

A

A person has committed the actus reus for attempt only when she has acquired all indispensible elements necessary to commit the target offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Probable Desistance

A

A person has committed the actus reus of attempt when she has performed sufficient conduct so that, in the natural and ordinary course of events, the target offense will result unless an external force intervenes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Substantial Step (MPC)

A

A person has committed the actus reus for attempt when she has committed acts (or omitted to commit acts) that constitute a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the target offense.

Conduct is not a substantial step unless it is strongly corroborative if the actor’s criminal purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Incomplete Attempt

A

If a person, acting with the requisite mens rea, does something less than all the actus reus required for the crime, that person may be liable for an incomplete attempt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Substantial Step (MPC) Examples

A
  • Lying in wait or reconnoitering the place
  • Searching for or following the victim
  • Enticing the victim to go to the place of ther crime
  • Unlawful entry into the place of the crime
  • Possession of materials for the crime if they are specially designed for such unlawful use or which can serve no lawful purpose under the circumstances
  • Soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Attempt

Actus Reus Tests

Res Ipso Loquitor / Unequivocality Test

A

A person commits the actus reus for attempt when her conduct manifests an intent to commit a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Complete Attempt

A

If a person, acting with the requisite mens rea, does everything in her power to commit a crime, but some external circumstance prevents the crime from being committed, it is a complete attempt.

27
Q

Treatment of Complete and Incomplete Attempts

A

They are treated the same for the purposes of liability and punishment.

28
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

MPC 5.01(4)

A

Renunciation is a defense under the MPC.

29
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

MPC 5.01(4)

Actus Reus

A

The actor must abandon the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevent its commission.

30
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

Common Law

A

Renunciation was not a defense to attempt during the common law because once one has committed a crime it cannot be undone.

31
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

MPC 5.01(4)

Mens Rea

A

The actor must voluntarily renounce the crime and completely renounce the criminal purpose.

32
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

MPC 5.01(4)

Voluntary Renunciation

A

Renunciation is not voluntary if it is motivated, on whole or in part, by a concern about the probability of detection or apprehension or about the difficulty if accomplishing the criminal purpose.

33
Q

Defense to Attempt

Renunciation

MPC 5.01(4)

Complete Renunciation

A

Renunciation is not complete if it is temporary or contingent, such as postponing the criminal conduct until another time or transferring the criminal effort to another victim or a similar objective

34
Q

Solicitation

A

A person commits solicitation if she intentionally asks, commands or entices another to commit a crime, with the intent that the other person commit that crime.

Under the common law, solicitation only applies to felonies and serious misdemeanors.

Under the MPC, it applies to all crimes.

35
Q

Common Law

Solicitation

Actus Reus

A

A person commits the actus reus of solicitation when she asks, commands or entices another to commit a crime

36
Q

Common Law

Solicitation

Mens Rea

A

A person has the mens rea of solicitation when she intentionally engages in asking, commanding or enticing with the intent that the other person commit the crime.

No solicitation exists when the person intends to commit the crime herself but asks for help.

37
Q

Common Law

Solicitation

Innocent Instrumentality

A

Defendants sometimes use an object or another person as an innocent instrumentality in the commission of an offense.

An innocent instrumentality is not guilty of the crime because, despite satisfying the actus reus, there is a lack of mens rea

The innocent instrumentality rule provides that a person is guilty of the underlying crime if, acting with the mens rea required for the commission of the offense, sue uses an innocent instrumentality to commit the crime.

38
Q

MPC

Solicitation

A

A person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime if

  • the actor’s purpose is to promote or facilitate the commission of a substantive offense; and
  • with such purpose, he commands, encourages, or requests another person to engage in conduct that would constitute the crime, an attempt to commit it, or would establish the other person’s complicity in its commission or attempted commission.
39
Q

Solicitaion and Attempt

A

The general rule is that a solicitation by itself does not constitute an attempt to commit the crime solicited.

Some courts hold that a solicitation coupled with a slight act by the solictor in furtherance of it is an attempt.

Other courts say it’s an attempt if the solicitor commits overt acts that would constitute an attempt if the solicitor intended to commit the crme

Courts are generally reluctant to impose liability for attempted solicitations.

40
Q

Uncommunicated Solicitation

Common Law

A

It is not a crime.

41
Q

Uncommunicated Solicitation

MPC 5.02 (2)

A

It is immaterial that the actor fails to communicate with the person he solicites to commit a crime if his conduct is designed to effect such communication.

42
Q

Solicitation and Accomplice Law

A

If a person solicits someone to commit a crime and the second person does so, the solicitor is automatically an accomplice to that crime.

43
Q

Defense to Solicitation

Renuciation

Common Law

A

It was not a defense under the common law.

44
Q

Defense to Solicitation

Renuciation

MPC

A

It is a defense.

45
Q

Defense to Solicitation

Renuciation

MPC

Actus Reus

A

The person must persuade others not to commit the crime or otherwise prevent its commission

46
Q

Defense to Solicitation

Renuciation

MPC

Mens Rea

A

The person must voluntarily and completely renounce the criminal purpose

47
Q

Conspiracy

Common Law

A

A person is guilty of conspiracy if

  • there is an agreement between two or more people to commit a criminal act or a legal act through unlawful means
  • with the intent to agree and
  • with the intent that the agreement lead to the commission of a crime or legal act through unlawful means
48
Q

Conspiracy

Modern Law

A

A person is guilty of conspiracy if

  • there is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime and
  • at least one person commits an overt act to further the conspiracy
  • with the intent to agree and
  • with the intent that the agreement lead to the commission of the crime
49
Q

Conspiracy

MPC

A

A person is guilty of conspiracy if she

  • agrees with another to engage in conduct that constitutes the crime or an attempt or solicitation of the crime and
  • commits an overt act if the target crime is less than a second degree felony
  • or agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to committ such crime
  • with the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of a crime
50
Q

Conspiracy

Modern Law / MPC

Overt Act

A

An overt act by any one party to a conspiracy is a sufficient basis to prosecute every member of the conspiracy.

This includes members who joined the agreement after the act was committed.

51
Q

Conspiracy

Agreement

A

The agreement can not only be to do an unlawful act but also to do a lawful act by criminal or unlawful means

52
Q

Conspiracy

Plurality Requirement

Common Law

A

The common law did not recognize unilateral conspiracies; at least two people had to agree and have the requisite mens rea.

So if one of the parties lacked the mens rea, there would be no liability for conspiracy.

53
Q

Conspiracy

Plurality Requirement

MPC

Trials

A

Since the MPC focuses on the individual, each individual’s conviction or aquittal does not affect the other’s as long as there is proof of an agreement

54
Q

Conspiracy

Plurality Requirement

Common Law

Trials

A

If defendants have a joint trial and one is aquitted, the other must be aquitted. This rule is breaking down.

If the trials are separate and one is aquitted, the other doesn’t have to be

55
Q

Conspiracy

Plurality Requirement

MPC

A

The MPC recognizes unilateral conspiracies. As long as the defendant has the requisite actus reus and mens rea, he is liable irrespective of the other person’s mens rea.

So even if one of the parties lacked the mens rea, there is liability for conspiracy.

56
Q

Number of Conspiracies

Common Law

A

Under Braverman v. United States, each agreement is a separate conspiracy.

57
Q

Number of Conspiracies

MPC

A

Generally, each agreement is a separate conspiracy, However, multiple agreements are the same conspiracy if they arise from a continuous conspiratorial relationship.

58
Q

Proof of the Conspiracy

A

A conspiracy can be proved through director or indirect evidence.

A crime committed by people in a conspiracy is likely to look choreographed. If it doesn’t, a court will probably need more direct evidence to prove there is a conspiracy.

59
Q

Defense to Conspiracy

Renunciation

Common Law

A

Renunciation was not a defense under the common law. However, if a person withdraws from a conspiracy, she may avoid liability for crimes the conspiracy commits after she withdraws.

60
Q

Defense to Conspiracy

Renunciation

MPC

A

Renunciation is a defense

61
Q

Defense to Conspiracy

Renunciation

MPC

Actus Reus

A

The person must thwart the success of the conspiracy.

62
Q

Defense to Conspiracy

Renunciation

MPC

Mens Rea

A

The person must voluntarily and completely renounce the criminal purpose

63
Q

Conspiracy and Other Offenses

A

It is possible to enter into an conspiracy without any parties committing solicitation.

It is possible for two or more people to be found liable for jointly committing an underlying crime even in the absence of a conspiracy.

Criminal Law (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions