Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Elements of Crimes - Actus Reus > Flashcards

Elements of Crimes - Actus Reus Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Actus Reus

A

The actus reus of an offense consists of

  1. A volitional
  2. act (or failure to act)
  3. that causes
  4. social harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus

Act

A
  • An act is a bodily movement made by the individual
  • It doesn’t count if a person causes another’s bodily movement.
  • The term “act” has nothing to do with the results of the act.
  • A person can do an act without thinking and it still can be volitional (ex. a habit, because you consciously form habits)
  • Involuntary acts like muscle spasms or reflexes don’t count
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus Reus

Volitional Act

MPC 2.01(1) & 1.12(1)

A

No person can be convicted of a crime unless he acted volitionally or failed to perform an act that he was physically able to perform

The prosecution must prove this beyond a reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Actus Reus

Exception

MPC 2.05(1)

A

The rules in 2.01 don’t apply to offenses that are violations, unless the count finds that applying 2.01 is consistant with effectively enforcing the law that defines the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Violations

A

Offenses that have a maxium penalty of a fine or civil penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Actus Reus

Social Harm

A
  • A social harm is the denial, endangerment or destruction of an individual, group or state interest that society deems socially valuable.
  • The definition of an offense will define the social harm
  • A social harm may contain wrongful conduct or wrongful results, but it will always contain attendent circumstances.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Actus Reus

Social Harm Elements

Conduct Crimes

A

Conduct crimes are offenses do not have to result in harm for the accused to be convicted. Ex. drunk driving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Actus Reus

Social Harm Elements

Result Crimes

A

Result crimes are crimes in which the result matters but the conduct does not. Ex. murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Actus Reus

Social Harm Elements

Attendant Circumstances

A

Attendent circumstances are elements found in the definition of a crime; they are factors or condictions that must exist at the time of the act. Ex. burglary - it must happen at night

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Time-Framing

A

Looking back to the time of the crime and before the time to try to determine whether the actor was culpable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MPC 1.13(5)

Conduct

A

An act or omission, or series of acts and omissions, and the accompanying state of mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actus Reus

Act

People v. Wilbert Davis

A

People cannot be punished based on their status, but can be punished for actions they do because of their status. Ex. can’t punish people for being drug addicts but can punish them for possessing drugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Status Offenses

A

Offenses that punish a person’s status. SCOTUS frowns on these.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Actus Reus

Crimes of Possessions

A
  • Prohibit possessing contraband or criminal instrumentalities
  • Requires that the defendant knowingly procured or received the item or failed to depose of it after becoming aware of its presence.
  • These are incomplete crimes, meaning police can arrest people they suspect will commit a crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Actus Reus

Commission by Ommision

A

If a duty exists and the person is capable of the required action, not doing it can substitute for a voluntary act.

Examples of When There’s a Duty to Act

  • Common Law
    • Special status relationship - when one person is dependant on another
    • Voluntary assumption of care in a manner that prevents others from rendering aid
    • Creating a harm
  • Contractal relationship
  • Statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MPC 1.13(1)

Statute

A

Includes the Constitution and any local law or ordinance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

MPC 1.13(2)

Act or Action

A

Any voluntary or involuntary bodily movement

18
Q

MPC 1.13(4)

Ommission

A

Failure to act

19
Q

MPC 1.13(6)-(7)
Actor or Acted

A

Includes a person guilty of an omission or an omitted act

20
Q

MPC 1.13(10)

Material Elements of an Offense

A

An element that does not exclusively relate to the jurisdiction, venue, or any matter that is not connected with

  • The harm or evil the law seeks to prevent or
  • A justification of or excuse for the conduct
21
Q

MPC 1.13(9)

Element of an Offense

A

Conduct or attendent circumstances or a result of conduct that

  • Is included in the conduct forbidden by the offense or
  • Establishes the required kind of culpability or
  • Negates an excuse for or justification for the conduct or
  • Negates a statute of limitations defense or
  • Establishes jurisdiction or venue
22
Q

MPC 2.01(1)

Requirements for Guilt

A

A person is only guilty of a crime if his conduct includes a voluntary act or an omission to perform an act that he is physically able to perform.

23
Q

MPC 2.01(2)

Non-Volutary Acts

A
  • Volitional acts are all willed body movements
  • Volitional acts do not include
    • Reflexive acts or convulsions
    • Movements while unconsious or
    • Movement while asleep or
    • Conduct during hypnosis
24
Q

MPC 2.01(4)

Possession

A

Possession is an act if the possessor knowingly procured or received the thing possessed or was aware of his possession long enough to get rid of it

25
Q

MPC 2.01(3)

Omission-Based Liability

A

Liability can be based fully on an ommision only when

  • The law specifically says the omission is enough to prove the offense
  • A duty to act is imposed by law
26
Q

Constructive Possession

A
  • You have possession over everything in your home because you exercise dominion and control over your home
  • Drivers exercise dominion and control over everything in the car even if the car is borrowed
  • Passangers are said to exercise dominion and control over the parts of the car they have access to
27
Q

Causation

A

Causation requires both actual cause and proximate cause

28
Q

Causation

Actual Cause

Cause-in-Fact

A
  • The defendant’s conduct must be the actual cause of the social harm.
  • Actual cause is proven by the but-for test - the social harm would not have occurred when it did in the manner it did in the absence of the defendant’s conduct.
29
Q

Causation

Proximate Cause

A

Proximate cause is proven by the natural and probable consequences of an action

30
Q

Causation

Proximate Cause

Intervening Cause

A

An intervening cause is an independant force that operates in producing the social harm, but which only comes into play after the defendant’s voluntary act has been committed or his omission has occurred

31
Q

Causation

Proximate Cause

Superseding Cause

A

When intervening cause relieves the defendant of criminal responsibility, the law describes it as a superseding cause

32
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

De Minimis Contributation to Social Harm

A

If the conduct of the second actor was worse than the first actor’s conduct, the second actor will be the proximate cause because the responsibility of the first actor is inconsequential compared to the responsibility of the second actor

33
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Foreseeability of the Intervening Cause

A

Many courts say that the linchpin of proximate cause is whether the intervening acts were reasonably foreseeable.

34
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Foreseeability of the Intervening Cause

Responsive Intervening Cause

A
  • A reponsive intervening cause is an act that occurs in reaction or response to the defendant’s prior wrongful conduct
  • Generally, a responsive intervening cause does not relieve the initial wrongdoer of criminal responsibility unless the response was abnormal and unforeseeable
35
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Foreseeability of the Intervening Cause

Coincidential Intervening Cause

A
  • A coincidential intervening cause is a force that does not occur in response to the initial wrongdoer’s conduct
  • The only relationship between the defendant’s conduct and the intervening cause is that the defendant placed the victim in a situation where the intervening cause could independently act upon him
  • Under common law, a coincidental intervening cause relieves the original wrongdoing of criminal responsibility, unless the intervention was forseeable
36
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

The Defendant’s Mens Rea

(Intented Consequences Doctrine)

A

Trace the cause of the social harm backwards through other causes until reaching an intentional wrongdoer

37
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Danerous Forces That Come to Rest

(Apparent Safety Doctrine)

A

If the dangerous situation passed into a point of safety, the defendant won’t be liable for harm that occurs after the point of safety

38
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Free, Deliberate, Informed Human Intervention

A

A defendant is far more likely to be relieved of criminal responsibility if the intervention is caused by a free, deliberate, informed act rather than actions of a person whose conduct is not fully free.

39
Q

Causation

Intervening Cause Factors

Omissions

A

An omission will rarely supersede an eariler operative wrongful act, even if the intervening actor had a duty to act

40
Q

Intervening Causes

MPC 2.03

A

A defendant has acted with the requisite culpability when the actual result, including the way in which it occurred, was not too remote or accidental in its occurance to have a just bearing on the actor’s liability or on the gravity of his offense.

41
Q

People v. DeCosta

A
  • To be held criminally responsible, a defendant’s conduct must actually contribute to the result by setting in motion the events that resulted
  • Liability will attach even if the defendant’s conduct is not the sole cause of the result if the actions were a sufficiently direct cause of that result
  • More than an obscure or merely probable connection between the conduct and the result is required
  • An act qualifies as a sufficiently direct cause when the ultimate harm should have been reasonably foreseen

Criminal Law (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions