Inchoate Crimes Flashcards
What are the inchoate crimes?
- Solicitation
- Attempt
- Conspiracy
Definition of Solicitation
- Enticing,
- advising,
- inciting,
- inducing,
- urging, or
- otherwise encouraging another to commit a felony or breach of the peace
When is the solicitation complete?
At the time the soliciation is made
A solicitor is treated as?
An accessory before the fact
What will the solicitor be guilty of?
Any solicited crime by the solicitee
Modern statutes defensens to solicitation
- Specific intent defenses such as voluntary intoxication and unreasonable mistake
- Impossibility and withdrawal not defenses
Elements of Attempt
- A specific intent to bring about a criminal result; and
- A significant overt act in furtherance of that intent
When is the attempt complete?
When the target crime is complete
(attempt and the target crime merge)
What is a significant overt act?
An act beyond “mere” preparation
Common law bandonment defense to Attempt
Abandonment is not a defense once attempt is complete
Abandonment defense under MPC
Voluntary and complete abandonment can be used as a defense
Voluntary = a true change of heart
Complete = ∆ is not merelyl postponing commission of the crime
Legal impossiblity defense
∆ did all the things he intended to do, but his act did not constitute a crime
What is a Conspiracy?
An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime
*actual agreement is needed
Must the agreement be express?
No.
The agreement may be proved circumstantially
Mental state required for conspiracy?
- Intent to agree, and
- Itnent to achieve the objective of the agreement
Overt Act Requirement
An overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is required for conspiracy liability
Pinkerton Doctrine
Each conspirator is liable for the crimes of all other co-conspirators where the crimes were both:
- a foreseeable outgrowth of the conspiracy; and
- committed in furtherance of the conspiratorial goal
*Most jurisdictions reject the Pinkerton doctrine and impose liability on conspirators merely upon the basis of the agreement
Wharton Rule
- In crimes where 2 or more people are necessary for the commission of the offense,
- there is no conspiracy unless the agreement involves an additional person who is not essential to the definition of that crime
Defenses to Conspiracy
- Common law = withdrawal
- MPC = renunciation
Withdrawal
Withdrawal is not a defense, BUT may cut off further liability for crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy IF the withdrawing conspirator communicates his withdrawal to each of the co-conspirators
Renunciation
- if co-conspirator withdraws; AND
- performs an affirmative act to thwart the success of the conspiracy,
- then can use the renunciation as an affirmative defense to the conspiracy