Inchoate Crimes Flashcards

1
Q

CL Criminal Attempt (3)

A
  1. Intent to commit target offense
  2. Dangerously close to committing target offense
  3. Failed to complete target offense
    MENS REA: intent to commit target offense
    ACTUS REUS: dangerously close to committing the crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Modern Criminal Attempt

A

replace “dangerously close” with “taking a substantial step toward” (much easier to prove than other)
MENS REA: intent to commit target offense
ACTUS REUS: taking a substantial step toward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Solicitation

A
  1. The government must establish that D had the intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a crime
  2. Government must prove that D commanded, induced, or otherwise endeavored to persuade the other person to commit the crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CL Accomplice Liability (3)

A
  1. Knowledge and the principal is committing a crime; and
  2. Intentionally assists the principal in completing the crime; and
  3. The crime is completed
    - NPC TEST
    MENS REA: knowledge that the principle is committing the crime
    ACTUS REUS: intentionally assists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MPC Accomplice Liability (4)

A
  1. Purposely facilitates or promotes the commission of a crime; and
  2. Solicits, or aids, or agrees, or attempts to agree to committing the crime; and
  3. With legal duty to prevent such a crime fails to do so; and
  4. The crime is completed
    MENS REA: purposely facilitates or promotes
    ACTUS REUS: solicit aids or attempts to agree
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common Law Conspiracy (5)

A
  1. Agreement
  2. Between two or more people
    (Only bilateral)
  3. To commit a crime;
  4. With the intent to form the agreement; and
  5. With the intent to complete the target crime
    - mens rea: intent to form the agreement AND intent to complete the target crime
    - actus reus: forming agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime (could be explicit or implicit, MEETING OF THE MINDS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MPC Conspiracy (6)

A
  1. Agreement;
  2. Between two or more people;
    Unilateral or bilateral
  3. To commit a crime;
  4. With the intent to form the agreement;
  5. With the intent to complete the crime; and
  6. An overt act (in furtherance)
    - mens rea: intent to form the agreement AND intent to complete the target crime
    - actus reus: forming agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime (could be explicit or implicit, MEETING OF THE MINDS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pinkerton Liability (3)

A
  1. D conspired with the co-conspirator to commit the target crime
  2. The additional crime was done in furtherance of the conspiracy
  3. The additional crime was reasonably foreseeable result of the target crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common Law Self-Defense (3)

A
  1. Honest, subjective belief use of force is necessary to protect against;
  2. Unlawful;
  3. Imminent use of harm
    - stand your ground, duty to retreat, castle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MPC Self-Defense

A

mens rea: what defendant honestly believes
- castle expanded to workplace
- rejects stand your ground
- embraces duty to retreat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stand Your Ground

A

(complete embrace of castle doctrine and rejection duty to retreat.) Deadly force can meet deadly force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duty to Retreat

A

before using deadly force you must have no ability to retreat; some jurisdictions may apply this to one’s home as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Castle Doctrine

A

one has no duty to retreat in their own “castle” AKA home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Provocation Doctrine

A

Test for recovering right to self defense:
1. Makes a clear disengagement from conduct
2. Attacker is not at risk of harm from disengage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly