In what ways and why are norms, practices and forms of love changing in contemporary liberal democracies? Flashcards

1
Q

For what do Morrison, Johnson and Longhurst (2013) argue?

A

For a greater consideration of love within social and cultural geography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three areas that need to be considered in this essay/

A

The couple and marriage
Morality and discourse
Dating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is the big guy for the transformation of the couple?

A

Giddens 1992

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Even though this essay will argue that the manifestations of love are changing, what does who argue?

A

Berlant 2012 - even as the manifestation of love changes, people still ahem enduring attachment to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What Gidden’s idea of confluent love?

A

Love is based on mutual respect. As long as relationship is beneficial for the individuals the relationship will continue, but if it ceases to be then there is no obligation to stay in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is a relationship a pure relationship?

A

When it continues to meet both partner’s emotional and sexual needs, as long as both are getting something from it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Gidden’s say about women’s rights?

A

That they, particularly in the private sphere, have reached new highs at the turn of the century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who critiques Giddens?

A

Jamieson 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the critique of Jamieson

A

Giddens has no empirical evidence. He emphasises a broad enlightenment sense of progress. None of this can be seen as independent from the rise of neoliberalism, in that it emphasises the individual over the collective within the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is testament to the extent that people desire marriage?

A

Legalisation of gay marriage by a conservative government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Despite its legalisation for homosexuals, what is there still within marriage?

A

An assumption of heterosexuality, that it lies on a normalised trajectory within a heterosexual relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In relation to marriage, what decline must also be considered?

A

The decline in religion and rise in secularism/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who argue that love is a patriarchal affect?

A

Firestone 1972; de Beauvoir 1972

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Even though love, and the idea that marriage is its ultimate site of realisation, is viewed by some to be a patriarchal intimation, what is there still?

A

A movement of people who want to extend it further

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For Berlant when, even though love’s manifestation is changing significantly what endures/

A

The continued attachment people have to it despite numerous occasions when it has failed to deliver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In the discourse and moral paragraph, what is it useful to draw upon

A

The public private dichotomy (See Habermas )

17
Q

Who looks, in 1993, at the differences in space between the public and private spheres?

A

Valentine

18
Q

As well as Valentine, who else sees space to be heterosexualised?

A

Oswin 2008

19
Q

Apart from Oswin 2008, what is the other article relevernt from the same author?

A

The difference between the public and private sphere in Singapore, between the discourse of government and the actions in law (sodomy still illegal, but their pink dot celebration (pride kind of thing) still gets loads of people)

20
Q

For the final section on dating practices, what can be argued?

A

Integrating neoliberlaism to argue that it is the rise of capitalism and consumerism that both originally transformed dating away from calling, and that provoked the latest change toward online dating.

21
Q

What are two examples of new forms of online dating

A

Private school dating -> Toffee

gender reversal -> bumble

22
Q

What is the first capitalist transformation

A

The spaces of cities. When women moved in, privacy lost, so dance hall became a thing

23
Q

Who says that dating replaced calling?

A

Illouz 1993

24
Q

What cannot be viewed as separate?

A

consumer culture and dating apps

25
Q

What is the juxtaposition within dating apps

A

The idea that it is all about chance, whilst algorithms are used to determine the likelihood of that chance

26
Q

What has reversed surrounding with knowledge surrounding online dating?

A

Before, knowledge would come after a connection. Now it comes after a connection.

27
Q

On online dating, people behave somewhere between what two things?

A

Shoppers and gamers

28
Q

Building on the idea of online dating, what does Bauman say in his thesis liquid love?

A

That modernity is eroding the sanctity of love

29
Q

Who presents a critique of Bauman?

A

Hobbs et al 2017

30
Q

What is Hobbs’ 2017 view of love and modernity>

A

actually enhancing love, the negative aspects have been overstretched.

31
Q

What three transformations does Hobbs locate?

A

1) removal of sex from its reproductive function
2) Personal sphere transformed with first wave feminism
3) Monogamy eroded

32
Q

Who speaks more about monogamy?

A

Hoof 2017

33
Q

For Hoof 2017, why is monogamy still naturalised and reproduced by society?

A

Because sex is discursively located as special

34
Q

How does Hoof 2017 quality their statement about monogamy?

A

Society has become more and more fascinated with the non-monogamous, Hoof cites Anna Kerenina as an early example but need also to consider documentaries such as Lousi Theoroux.

35
Q

What is the citation for dating being down to the chaining organisation of cities, beyond Illouz 1993?

A

Giddens 1992